Retrospective Study of Acanthamoebic Keratitis During the Past 10 Years
Retrospective Study of the in Vivo Confocal Microscopic Findings and the Treatment Outcome of Acanthamoebic Keratitis
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acanthamoebic keratitis is an important corneal disease which may cause severe complication. The difficulty in diagnosis, the difficulty in treatment, and the long treatment process are factors leading to the poor prognosis of these patients. In this retrospective study, the investigators try to analyze the tissue proven Acanthamoebic keratitis diagnosed in our hospital. The investigators will focus on the in vivo confocal microscopic results, the medical history and the medical/surgical treatment outcome. The investigators will collect the tissue proven cases according to the data provided by laboratory diagnosis department and pathological department. The in vivo confocal microscopic results will be collected and analyzed. The investigators will also look through the photography of the external eyes from data stored in PAC system. The medical history and treatment outcome will be studied from clinical chart review. From this study, the investigators aimed to find out a easy way of diagnosing Acanthamoebic keratitis from in vivo confocal microscopy, and find out a better way for treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2014
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedMay 9, 2016
May 1, 2016
2.4 years
April 12, 2016
May 5, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with typical image finding under an in vivo confocal microscope (Confoscan 3.4.1; Nidek Technologies, Padova, Italy)
through study completion, an average of about 10 year microscope diagnosis and disease progress prediction of patients with Acanthamoe
Study Arms (1)
patients diagnosed with acanthamoeba keratitis
Inclusion Criteria: \- All patients presenting to National Taiwan University Department from Jun. 1st, 2003 to dec. 30th , 2016 with the tissue proven corneal AK will be included. Exclusion Criteria \- Patients with tissue proven corneal AK during from Jun. 1st, 2003 to dec. 30th , 2016, but without in vivo confocal data, or complete chart records.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
The in vivo confocal microscopic data and medical records of all recruited patients diagnosed with Acanthamoeba Keratitis will be reviewed after approved by the NTUH Institutional Review Board Committee. Data collected include patient demographics (age, gender), local findings, external eye photos, treatment course and treatment outcome. In vivo confocal microscope exam results will be compared with the clinical manifestation.
You may qualify if:
- presenting to National Taiwan University Department from Jun. 1st, 2003 to dec. 30th , 2016
- suspecting Acanthamoeba Keratitis by the ophthalmologist
- drug treatment as Acanthamoeba Keratitis successed
- tissue proved to be Acanthamoeba Keratitis
- referred from the other hospital with the diagnose of Acanthamoeba Keratitis
You may not qualify if:
- patients suspect corneal Acanthamoeba Keratitis from Jun. 1st, 2003 to dec. 30th , 2013, but without in vivo confocal data, or complete chart records.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan, 100, Taiwan
Related Publications (13)
Naginton J, Watson PG, Playfair TJ, McGill J, Jones BR, Steele AD. Amoebic infection of the eye. Lancet. 1974 Dec 28;2(7896):1537-40. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90285-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 4140981BACKGROUNDMathers WD, Sutphin JE, Folberg R, Meier PA, Wenzel RP, Elgin RG. Outbreak of keratitis presumed to be caused by Acanthamoeba. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Feb;121(2):129-42. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70577-x.
PMID: 8623882BACKGROUNDClaerhout I, Goegebuer A, Van Den Broecke C, Kestelyn P. Delay in diagnosis and outcome of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug;242(8):648-53. doi: 10.1007/s00417-003-0805-7.
PMID: 15221303BACKGROUNDWinchester K, Mathers WD, Sutphin JE, Daley TE. Diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis in vivo with confocal microscopy. Cornea. 1995 Jan;14(1):10-7.
PMID: 7712728BACKGROUNDMatsumoto Y, Dogru M, Sato EA, Katono Y, Uchino Y, Shimmura S, Tsubota K. The application of in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in the management of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Mol Vis. 2007 Jul 25;13:1319-26.
PMID: 17679934BACKGROUNDParmar DN, Awwad ST, Petroll WM, Bowman RW, McCulley JP, Cavanagh HD. Tandem scanning confocal corneal microscopy in the diagnosis of suspected acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2006 Apr;113(4):538-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.022.
PMID: 16581415BACKGROUNDYokogawa H, Kobayashi A, Yamazaki N, Ishibashi Y, Oikawa Y, Tokoro M, Sugiyama K. Bowman's layer encystment in cases of persistent Acanthamoeba keratitis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1245-51. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S34695. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
PMID: 22927735BACKGROUNDRezaei Kanavi M, Naghshgar N, Javadi MA, Sadat Hashemi M. Various confocal scan features of cysts and trophozoites in cases with Acanthamoeba keratitis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22 Suppl 7:S46-50. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000139.
PMID: 22427148BACKGROUNDPfister DR, Cameron JD, Krachmer JH, Holland EJ. Confocal microscopy findings of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Feb;121(2):119-28. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70576-8.
PMID: 8623881BACKGROUNDShiraishi A, Uno T, Oka N, Hara Y, Yamaguchi M, Ohashi Y. In vivo and in vitro laser confocal microscopy to diagnose acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea. 2010 Aug;29(8):861-5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ca36b6.
PMID: 20508505BACKGROUNDDart JK, Saw VP, Kilvington S. Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis and treatment update 2009. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;148(4):487-499.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
PMID: 19660733BACKGROUNDRadford CF, Lehmann OJ, Dart JK. Acanthamoeba keratitis: multicentre survey in England 1992-6. National Acanthamoeba Keratitis Study Group. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Dec;82(12):1387-92. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.12.1387.
PMID: 9930269BACKGROUNDOldenburg CE, Acharya NR, Tu EY, Zegans ME, Mannis MJ, Gaynor BD, Whitcher JP, Lietman TM, Keenan JD. Practice patterns and opinions in the treatment of acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea. 2011 Dec;30(12):1363-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31820f7763.
PMID: 21993459BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Wei-Li Chen, MD,PHD
professor of National Taiwan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2016
First Posted
May 5, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05