Preliminary Assessment of Added Diagnostic Value of Dual Energy CT Images Using Data Acquired on a Spectral Detector CT
Preliminary Assessment of the Added Diagnostic Value of Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) Images Using Data Acquired on a Spectral Detector Computed Tomography (SDCT)
1 other identifier
observational
303
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Study hypothesis: Post-processed SDCT images provide additional diagnostic value over conventional CT datasets. The CT examination would be a clinically-necessary, standard-of-care CT performed as per the clinical indication. The protocol and scan parameters for the CT exam will be similar to that of an equivalent scan performed with any other CT scanner. There would be no additional scanner of injection of any drug specifically for the study. The conventional CT images generated by the scanner will be used for clinical purposes as routinely practiced.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2013
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedMay 19, 2017
May 1, 2017
2.9 years
November 24, 2013
May 18, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Determine if Post-processed SDCT images provide additional diagnostic value over conventional CT datasets.
Data will be recorded as mean +/- standard deviation for each parameter. Student's t test and Wilcoxon's test will be performed to compare objective and subjective data respectively. In addition, differences on lesion detection and characterization, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of conventional CT and SDCT images will be compared using a receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. Additionally, agreement between both readers will be evaluated using Cohen´s kappa test (poor agreement for κ ≤ 0.19; fair agreement for κ = 0.2-0.39; moderate agreement for κ = 0.4-0.59, substantial agreement for κ = 0.6-0.79 and very good agreement for κ = 0.8-1.00; 19). A P value of \<0.05 will be required for statistical significant difference.
6 months
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients requiring a clinically-necessary CT scan
You may qualify if:
- a patient scheduled for a clinically indicated CT scan for one or more of the following body regions/organ systems:
- head and neck
- body (chest and abdomen/pelvis)
- cardiovascular structures.
- these scans may be without contrast, with contrast enhancement, or CT angiograms.
You may not qualify if:
- under the age of 18 years old
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert C Gilkeson,, M.D.
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Prabhakar Rajiah,, M.D.
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2013
First Posted
May 4, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05