NCT02760706

Brief Summary

Study hypothesis: Post-processed SDCT images provide additional diagnostic value over conventional CT datasets. The CT examination would be a clinically-necessary, standard-of-care CT performed as per the clinical indication. The protocol and scan parameters for the CT exam will be similar to that of an equivalent scan performed with any other CT scanner. There would be no additional scanner of injection of any drug specifically for the study. The conventional CT images generated by the scanner will be used for clinical purposes as routinely practiced.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
303

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2013

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 24, 2013

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 4, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 19, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

November 24, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Determine if Post-processed SDCT images provide additional diagnostic value over conventional CT datasets.

    Data will be recorded as mean +/- standard deviation for each parameter. Student's t test and Wilcoxon's test will be performed to compare objective and subjective data respectively. In addition, differences on lesion detection and characterization, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of conventional CT and SDCT images will be compared using a receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. Additionally, agreement between both readers will be evaluated using Cohen´s kappa test (poor agreement for κ ≤ 0.19; fair agreement for κ = 0.2-0.39; moderate agreement for κ = 0.4-0.59, substantial agreement for κ = 0.6-0.79 and very good agreement for κ = 0.8-1.00; 19). A P value of \<0.05 will be required for statistical significant difference.

    6 months

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients requiring a clinically-necessary CT scan

You may qualify if:

  • a patient scheduled for a clinically indicated CT scan for one or more of the following body regions/organ systems:
  • head and neck
  • body (chest and abdomen/pelvis)
  • cardiovascular structures.
  • these scans may be without contrast, with contrast enhancement, or CT angiograms.

You may not qualify if:

  • under the age of 18 years old

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospitals Case Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisRadiographic Image EnhancementImage EnhancementPhotographyRadiographyTomography, X-RayTomography

Study Officials

  • Robert C Gilkeson,, M.D.

    University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Prabhakar Rajiah,, M.D.

    University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2013

First Posted

May 4, 2016

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion

September 1, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 19, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Locations