Vasoactive Drugs in Real World Practice
Short-course Somatostatin Versus Terlipressin Infusion in Combination With Endoscopic Variceal Ligation for the Prevention of Early Esophageal Variceal Rebleeding
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Various vasoactive drugs are recommended to use in combination with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in treating acute esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB). The efficacy and drug choice of vasoactive agents under Taiwan's National Health Insurance program remain to be validated. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the efficacy of somatostatin, compared with terlipressin in cirrhotic patients who have acute EVB and received EVL and the preference of vasoactive agents in real-world clinical practice. From April 2010 through April 2015, cirrhotic patients with significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding were screened. Eligible patients with acute EVB were non-randomly assigned to receive early administration of somatostatin (group S) or terlipressin (group T) infusion, followed by EVL. A decision to use vasoactive drugs depended on the physician's favorite. In group S, somatostatin by intravenous bolus (250 μg) followed by 250 μg/hour was continued for 3 days. In group T, terlipressin was started with 2mg bolus injection and followed by 1 mg infusion every 6 hours for 3 days.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2016
CompletedMay 3, 2016
April 1, 2016
4.7 years
April 16, 2016
April 29, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence rate of early rebleeding
Early rebleeding was defined as variceal hemorrhage occurs from day 3 till day 42 after initial bleeding arrest. An episode of clinically significant bleeding is being defined by blood transfusion \> 2 units of packed red blood cells.
up to 42 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Incidence rate of very early rebleeding
up to 5 days
Incidence rate of mortality
up to 42 days
Percentage of participants with treatment-related adverse effects assessed by CTCAE v4.0
up to 42 days
Study Arms (2)
somatostatin group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSomatostatin (Somatosan, BAG Health Care GmbH, Lich, Germany) was given by intravenous bolus (250 μg) followed by 250 μg/hour and continued for 3 days in group S.
terlipressin group
PLACEBO COMPARATORTerlipressin (Glypressin, Ferring GmbH, Kiel, Germany) was started at 2mg bolus injection and followed by 1 mg infusion every 6 hours for 3 days in group T.
Interventions
A decision to use vasoactive drugs (either somatostatin or terlipressin) depended on the favorite of participating attending physicians who were requested to fill out the enclosed questionnaires immediately after the administration of the first dose for further understanding the underlying reason of the chosen medication.
A decision to use vasoactive drugs (either somatostatin or terlipressin) depended on the favorite of participating attending physicians who were requested to fill out the enclosed questionnaires immediately after the administration of the first dose for further understanding the underlying reason of the chosen medication.
Both study groups were administered with 40mg pantoprazole intravenously after EVL for 3 days, and following oral form for 12 days to hasten the process of healing of ulcers induced by ligation.
Two experienced endoscopists performed emergent EVL for the enrolled patients with acute EVB. Pneumoactive ligation device (Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and endoscopes (GIF XQ260; Olympus Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) were applied. The targeted varix was suctioned and entrapped by a cap on endoscope. Ligation was aimed at active bleeding sites, red color spots or white nipple signs during the procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- acute hemorrhage from esophageal varice(s)
- portal hypertension attributed by cirrhosis
- age was between 20 and 80 years old
You may not qualify if:
- being associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) \> C
- being associated with severe illness such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), septic shock, cerebral vascular event, acute coronary syndrome and uremia
- with current gastric variceal bleeding
- ever underwent endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS), EVL within 6 month prior to current bleeding episode
- ever received shunt or transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic stent shunt (TIPS) procedure
- allergic to and/or with contraindications of vasopressors
- pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine
Kaohsiung City, 81362, Taiwan
Related Publications (6)
GARCEAU AJ, CHALMERS TC. The natural history of cirrhosis. I. Survival with esophageal varices. N Engl J Med. 1963 Feb 28;268:469-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196302282680905. No abstract available.
PMID: 13946478BACKGROUNDGraham DY, Smith JL. The course of patients after variceal hemorrhage. Gastroenterology. 1981 Apr;80(4):800-9.
PMID: 6970703BACKGROUNDGarcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W; Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007 Sep;46(3):922-38. doi: 10.1002/hep.21907. No abstract available.
PMID: 17879356BACKGROUNDde Franchis R. Evolving consensus in portal hypertension. Report of the Baveno IV consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2005 Jul;43(1):167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.05.009. No abstract available.
PMID: 15925423BACKGROUNDChitapanarux T, Ritdamrongthum P, Leerapun A, Pisespongsa P, Thongsawat S. Three-day versus five-day somatostatin infusion combination with endoscopic variceal ligation in the prevention of early rebleeding following acute variceal hemorrhage: A randomized controlled trial. Hepatol Res. 2015 Dec;45(13):1276-82. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12503. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
PMID: 25676742BACKGROUNDRengasamy S, Ali SM, Sistla SC, Lakshmi CP, Harichandra Kumar KT. Comparison of 2 days versus 5 days of octreotide infusion along with endoscopic therapy in preventing early rebleed from esophageal varices: a randomized clinical study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr;27(4):386-92. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000300.
PMID: 25874510BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jin-Shiung Cheng, MD
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2016
First Posted
May 2, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 3, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share