NCT02757690

Brief Summary

Traditionally, laparoscopy has been based on 2-dimensional (2D) imaging, which has represented a considerable challenge for those approaching this technique. Thus, 3-dimensional (3D) visualization technology for laparoscopy has been proposed, since the early 1990s, as a way to facilitate laparoscopic performance. However, early 3D laparoscopic technology was limited in terms of image quality, so that its use had not been implemented. More recently, industry has developed novel 3D systems where the imaging is similar to stereoscopic vision, in which the depth perception is achieved by different unique images received by each eye. Thus, more recent studies have suggested a possible advantage provided by these new 3D systems during laparoscopic performance. However, comparative assessments of new generation 3D vs 2D laparoscopy remain limited, especially in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic field. To assess the benefits and harms of use of three dimensional systems versus two dimensional systems during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 26, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 2, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 2, 2016

Status Verified

April 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

April 26, 2016

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Operation time

    The unedited videos of the operations will be assessed from start to end of the operation by two clinicians. The average of operation time will be compare according to 2D versus 3D laparoscopic system.

    expected duration: 200mins (for each operation)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Numbers of errors during operation

    During operation (expected duration: 200mins)

  • Subjective scoring in the view of operator, 1st assist

    During operation (expected duration: 200mins)

Study Arms (2)

2-dimenasional distal pancreatectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

device: 2 dimensional laparoscopy of Olympus

Device: 2-dimensional distal pancreatectomy

3-dimenasional distal pancreatectomy

EXPERIMENTAL

device : 3 dimensional laparoscopy of Olympus

Device: 3-dimensional distal pancreatectomy

Interventions

3D laparoscopy

Also known as: 3D
3-dimenasional distal pancreatectomy

2D laparoscopy

Also known as: 2D
2-dimenasional distal pancreatectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • BMI \> 30 (Kg/m2)
  • History of severe or recurrent pancreatitis
  • Mass size \> 10cm
  • History of low abdomen major operation
  • Additional resection for extra-pancreatic organ

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants refusal.
  • Additional resection dependent on pathological examination in intraoperative or postoperative period.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Officials

  • Songcheol Kim, MD PhD

    Asan Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2016

First Posted

May 2, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

February 1, 2016

Study Completion

February 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 2, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-04