Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy: Ultra-perc Versus Ciaglia Blue Dolphin
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare Ultra-perc single stage dilator technique with Ciaglia Blue Dolphin ballon dilatation technique for intubated unweanable ICU patients with respect to procedure difficulties and complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2016
CompletedApril 28, 2016
April 1, 2016
2.9 years
April 25, 2016
April 27, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Procedure difficulties including difficult dilatation, difficult tube insertion, failed tube insertion, false passage and tracheal stoma over dilatation.
within 2 years
Procedure complications including cardiac arrest, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema, hemorrhage and lung atelectasis.
within 2 years
Study Arms (2)
Ultra-perc
EXPERIMENTALCiaglia Blue Dolphin
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Procedure difficulties and complications faced while doing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy using Ultra-Perc
Procedure difficulties and complications faced while doing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy using Ciaglia Blue Dolphin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- sepsis
- cerebrovascular accidents
- cervical cord injury
- traumatic brain injury
- post arrest and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
You may not qualify if:
- patient or family refusal
- emergency tracheostomy
- distorted abnormal anatomy
- bleeding diathesis
- morbid obesity
- previous tracheostomy
- infected surgical site
- Adult respiratory distress syndrome patients requiring high positive end expiratory pressure and high oxygen demands
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Cianchi G, Zagli G, Bonizzoli M, Batacchi S, Cammelli R, Biondi S, Spina R, Peris A. Comparison between single-step and balloon dilatational tracheostomy in intensive care unit: a single-centre, randomized controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jun;104(6):728-32. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq087. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
PMID: 20413380RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2016
First Posted
April 28, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 28, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share