NCT02748343

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare use of a tissue-engineered bone to use of a standard allograft bone to treat bone defect in patients. The hypothesis is that use of the tissue-engineered bone is effective and safe to treat the bone defect in patients.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2014

Longer than P75 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2014

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 9, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 22, 2016

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2019

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 17, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

March 9, 2016

Last Update Submit

November 15, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • The scores of bone healing

    The scores of bone healing are divided into three kinds: nonhealing: 0; delayed healing: 1; normal healing: 2. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone.

    within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect

  • the adverse event incidence using tissue-engineered bone and allograft bone

    the adverse event incidence of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the adverse event incidence of allograft bone to verify the safety of tissue-engineered bone.

    within 24 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • The scores of blood routine test

    within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect

  • The scores of erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR)

    within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect

  • The scores of C-reactive protein

    within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect

  • The scores of the ratio of complement C3 to complement C4

    within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect

  • The scores of immunoglobulin assay

    within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

allograft bone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

traditional allograft bone

Device: allograft bone

tissue-engineered bone

EXPERIMENTAL

tissue-engineered bone

Device: tissue-engineered bone

Interventions

Use of the allograft bone to treat the bone defect in patients

allograft bone

Use of the tissue-engineered bone to treat the bone defect in patients

tissue-engineered bone

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • the patients with bone defect and bone nonunion caused by tumor or trauma
  • the length of bone defect in long diaphysis is more than 4cm or more than half of the shaft diameter
  • the size of bone defect is more than 5cmx5cm
  • the patients are unable to use autologous bone graft or other treatments
  • the patients request to use the treatment of tissue-engineered bone
  • Supportive family with willingness to participate in completing questionnaires

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with serious diseases such as hemorrhagic disorders, infection, tumor, contagion and so on.
  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patients with serious abnormal cardiopulmonary function
  • Patients disagree to use the tissue-engineered bone
  • Patients are older than 60 years
  • Patients who are regarded to be unqualified by investigator

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University

Xi’an, Shanxi, 710032, China

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

long bi, MD,PHD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2016

First Posted

April 22, 2016

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2019

Study Completion

December 1, 2020

Last Updated

November 17, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Locations