Accuracy of 1.5 T Versus 3 T Magnetic Resonance Arterial Spin Labeling to Measure Renal Blood Flow
Randomized, Clinical Study to Compare Accuracy of 1.5 T Versus 3 T Magnetic Resonance Arterial Spin Labeling to Measure Renal Blood Flow and the Changes of Renal Perfusion Caused by Physiological Stress (Cold Pressor Test).
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study we want to compare the accuracy of two methods to measure renal perfusion by MRI spin labelling technique: the first measurement done with the 1.5 T MRI versus the second one obtained with the 3.0 T MRI (Siemens MRI device). Additionally we want to compare the changes of renal perfusion caused by physiological stress. The used stress test is the cold pressor test done at the forehead.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable hypertension
Started May 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable hypertension
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 26, 2020
March 1, 2020
4.8 years
October 8, 2015
March 25, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of 1.5 T versus 3 T magnetic resonance arterial spin labeling to measure renal perfusion (ml/min)
Renal function will be measured in ml/min by MRI arterial spin labelling technique.
2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
1.5 Tesla MRI
EXPERIMENTALMeasurement of renal perfusion by 1.5 Tesla MRI with arterial spin labelling
3.0 Tesla MRI
EXPERIMENTALMeasurement of renal perfusion by 3.0 Tesla MRI with arterial spin labelling
Interventions
measurement of renal perfusion with MRI arterial spin labelling technique
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and Female patients are eligible. Females of child bearing potential (WOCBP) are only eligible if pregnancy test at the screening visit is negative and they use adequate contraceptive precautions during the trial.
- Healthy volunteers and patients who have hypertension stage 1 or 2 or patients who have diabetes at a max of 2 oral antidiabetic agents will be included
You may not qualify if:
- eGFR ≤ 45 ml/min/1.75m²
- any cardiovascular or cerebrovascular other other severe events within the last 3 months
- arterial hypertension grad \> 2 ( blood pressure ≥ 180/110)
- Subject who do not give written consent, that pseudonymous data will be transferred in line with the duty of documentation and the duty of notification according to § 12 and § 13 GCP-V
- Any contraindications to MRI
- Brain aneurysm clip
- Implanted cardiac pacemaker, pacemaker wires or defibrillator
- Prosthetic heart valves
- Cochlear implant
- Ocular foreign body
- Implanted insulin pump,
- Tattoo (as determined by imager)
- agoraphobia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinical Research Unit, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg
Erlangen, 91054, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Hammon M, Janka R, Siegl C, Seuss H, Grosso R, Martirosian P, Schmieder RE, Uder M, Kistner I. Reproducibility of Kidney Perfusion Measurements With Arterial Spin Labeling at 1.5 Tesla MRI Combined With Semiautomatic Segmentation for Differential Cortical and Medullary Assessment. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(11):e3083. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003083.
PMID: 26986143BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roland E. Schmieder, MD
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2015
First Posted
April 21, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2019
Study Completion
March 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 26, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03