Randomized Controlled Trail for Post Laparoscopic Pain
Prevention of Post-laparoscopic Shoulder and Upper Abdominal Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
360
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laparoscopic surgery is becoming a major procedure, owing to smaller incisions, shorter hospitalizations, and less post-operative pain as compared with traditional laparotomies. However, there is marked interindividual variability of post-operative shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopic surgery. The incidence of shoulder pain varies from 35% to 80% and ranges from mild to severe. In some cases, it has been reported to last more than 72 hours after surgery. The hypothesis of post-operative shoulder-tip pain is that carbon dioxide induced phrenic nerve irritation causes referred pain to C4. Therefore, we should try to do is that if we could reduce carbon dioxide retention in the pelvic cavity. This clinical controlled trial is tried to find out the practical and clinical maneuver to reduce post-operative should-tip pain following laparoscopic surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedApril 20, 2016
April 1, 2016
3.8 years
September 1, 2014
April 16, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline pain score of should and upper abdominal pain at 12 hours after surgery
The main objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy of clinical maneuver to reduce shoulder and upper abdominal pain. Thus the primary outcome measure of this trial is the severity and frequency of their should and upper abdominal pain. The pain score is based on the visual analogue scale in which patients record the intensity of their pain 12 hours after surgery. VAS consists of a subjective evaluation of the pain on a scale of 10 in which 0 is no pain and 10 the most severe pain.
Baseline and 12 hours after surgery
Change from baseline pain score of should and upper abdominal pain at 24 hours after surgery
The main objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy of clinical maneuver to reduce shoulder and upper abdominal pain. Thus the primary outcome measure of this trial is the severity and frequency of their should and upper abdominal pain. The pain score is based on the visual analogue scale in which patients record the intensity of their pain 24 hours after surgery. VAS consists of a subjective evaluation of the pain on a scale of 10 in which 0 is no pain and 10 the most severe pain.
Baseline and 24 hours after surgery
Change from baseline pain score of should and upper abdominal pain at 48 hours after surgery
The main objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy of clinical maneuver to reduce shoulder and upper abdominal pain. Thus the primary outcome measure of this trial is the severity and frequency of their should and upper abdominal pain. The pain score is based on the visual analogue scale in which patients record the intensity of their pain 48 hours after surgery. VAS consists of a subjective evaluation of the pain on a scale of 10 in which 0 is no pain and 10 the most severe pain.
Baseline and 48 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline of Nause, vomiting and abdominal distention rate at 48 hours after surgery
Baseline and 48 hours after surgery
Study Arms (3)
Combined maneuver
EXPERIMENTALCombined maneuver: the upper part of the abdominal cavity was evenly and bilaterally filled with the 0.9% normal saline in the amount of 500 cc. We will leave the fluid in the abdominal cavity. Then, a pulmonary recruitment maneuver consisting of five manual pulmonary inflations was performed with a maximum pressure of 60 cm dihydrogen monoxide (H2O). The anesthesiologist held the fifth positive pressure inflation for approximately 5 seconds.
Intraperitoneal infusion
EXPERIMENTALthe upper part of the abdominal cavity was evenly and bilaterally filled with the 0.9% normal saline in the amount of 500 cc. We will leave the fluid in the abdominal cavity.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONCO2 was removed by passive exsufflation through the port site.
Interventions
Combined maneuver (Intraperitoneal normal saline infusion and Pulmonary recruitment maneuver): the upper part of the abdominal cavity was evenly and bilaterally filled with the 0.9% normal saline in the amount of 500 cc. We will leave the 0.9% normal saline fluid in the abdominal cavity. Then, a pulmonary recruitment maneuver consisting of five manual pulmonary inflations was performed with a maximum pressure of 60 cm H2O. The anesthesiologist held the fifth positive pressure inflation for approximately 5 seconds.
the upper part of the abdominal cavity was evenly and bilaterally filled with the 0.9% normal saline in the amount of 500 cc. We will leave the 0.9% normal saline fluid in the abdominal cavity.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients receive benign gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of patient:
- classification I-II
You may not qualify if:
- The procedure will be required to conversion to laparotomy.
- Any cardio-vascular diseases.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 112, Taiwan
Related Publications (2)
Phelps P, Cakmakkaya OS, Apfel CC, Radke OC. A simple clinical maneuver to reduce laparoscopy-induced shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;111(5):1155-60. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816e34b4.
PMID: 18448749RESULTEsmat ME, Elsebae MM, Nasr MM, Elsebaie SB. Combined low pressure pneumoperitoneum and intraperitoneal infusion of normal saline for reducing shoulder tip pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2006 Nov;30(11):1969-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0752-z.
PMID: 17043939RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Yi Jen Chen, M.D., Ph.D.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hsiao Wen Tsai, M.D.
Taipei Veterans General Hostipal, Taipei
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- YJ Chen, MD, PhD, deaprtment of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2014
First Posted
April 20, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04