Study Of PF-06817024 In Healthy Subjects, In Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps And in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis
A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, THIRD-PARTY OPEN, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOSE ESCALATING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF SINGLE AND/OR MULTIPLE INTRAVENOUS AND/OR SUBCUTANEOUS DOSES OF PF-06817024 IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS WHO MAY BE MILDLY ATOPIC, SUBJECTS WITH CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS WITH NASAL POLYPS, AND SUBJECTS WITH MODERATE-SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS
1 other identifier
interventional
97
1 country
20
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-06817024 in healthy volunteers, in participants with chronic rhinosinusitis, with nasal polyps and in participants with moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 healthy
Started Apr 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_1 healthy
20 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 27, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 9, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 19, 2022
CompletedMay 19, 2022
February 1, 2022
4.9 years
April 15, 2016
February 28, 2022
February 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (21)
Number of Participants With All-causality Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Part 1
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs and SAEs in Part 1
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. The causality of TEAEs and SAEs was determined by the investigator.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).
Number of All-Causality TEAEs According to Severity in Part 1
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. TEAE was assessed by the investigator according to severity; Mild: did not interfere with participant's usual function; moderate: interfered to some extent with participant's usual function; severe: interfered significantly with participant's usual function.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).
Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation Due to TEAEs in Part 1
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).
Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs and SAEs in Part 2
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs and SAEs in Part 2
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. The causality of TEAEs and SAEs was determined by the investigator.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.
Number of All-Causality TEAEs According to Severity in Part 2
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. TEAE was assessed by the investigator according to severity; Mild: did not interfere with participant's usual function; moderate: interfered to some extent with participant's usual function; severe: interfered significantly with participant's usual function.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.
Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation Due to TEAEs in Part 2
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.
Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs and SAEs in Part 3
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs and SAEs in Part 3
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. The causality of TEAEs and SAEs was determined by the investigator.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.
Number of All-Causality TEAEs According to Severity in Part 3
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. TEAE was assessed by the investigator according to severity; Mild: did not interfere with participant's usual function; moderate: interfered to some extent with participant's usual function; severe: interfered significantly with participant's usual function.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.
Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation Due to TEAEs in Part 3
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology, Chemistry, and Urinalysis in Part 1
Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet and white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes. Chemistry parameters included blood urea nitrogen, glucose (fasting), calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein. Urine parameters included pH, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, microscopy. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator and those met the criteria of AE are listed here. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant in the whole study are presented here.
Part 1 single-dose cohorts: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 211. Part 1 multiple-dose cohorts: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 241.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology, Chemistry, and Urinalysis in Part 2
Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet and white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes. Chemistry parameters included blood urea nitrogen, glucose (fasting), calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein. Urine parameters included pH, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, microscopy. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator and those met the criteria of AE are listed here. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant in the whole study are presented here.
Part 2: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 211.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology, Chemistry, and Urinalysis in Part 3
Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet and white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes. Chemistry parameters included blood urea nitrogen, glucose (fasting), calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein. Urine parameters included pH, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, microscopy. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator and those met the criteria of AE are listed here. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant in the whole study are presented here.
Part 3: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 966.
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities in Part 1
Criteria for abnormality in vital signs: supine pulse rate \<40 beats per minute (bpm) or \>120 bpm; supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \<50 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=20 mmHg; supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=30 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dosing. Vital sign abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211 for Part 1 SD cohorts, and Study Day 241 for Part 1 MD cohorts).
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities in Part 2
Criteria for abnormality in vital signs: supine pulse rate \<40 bpm or \>120 bpm; supine DBP \<50 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=20 mmHg; supine SBP \<90 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=30 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dosing. Vital sign abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211).
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities in Part 3
Criteria for abnormality in vital signs: supine pulse rate \<40 bpm or \>120 bpm; supine DBP \<50 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=20 mmHg; supine SBP \<90 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=30 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dosing. Vital sign abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 337).
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities in Part 1
ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) maximum QTc interval adjusted according Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): 450\<= QTcF \<480, 480\<= QTcF \<500, and QTcF \>=500; QTcF maximum increase from baseline(msec): 30\<= change \<60, and change \>=60; 2) maximum PR interval (msec): \>=300; PR increase from baseline (msec): baseline \>200 with 25% increase at maximum, baseline \<=200 with 50% increase at maximum; 3) maximum QRS (msec): \>=140; QRS increase from baseline (msec) \>=50%. Baseline was defined as the average of the last triplicate measurement prior to the first dosing. ECG abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211 for Part 1 SD cohorts, and Study Day 241 for Part 1 MD cohorts).
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities in Part 2
ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) maximum QTc interval adjusted according Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): 450\<= QTcF \<480, 480\<= QTcF \<500, and QTcF \>=500; QTcF maximum increase from baseline(msec): 30\<= change \<60, and change \>=60; 2) maximum PR interval (msec): \>=300; PR increase from baseline (msec): baseline \>200 with 25% increase at maximum, baseline \<=200 with 50% increase at maximum; 3) maximum QRS (msec): \>=140; QRS increase from baseline (msec) \>=50%. Baseline was defined as the average of the last triplicate measurement prior to the first dosing. ECG abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211).
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities in Part 3
ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) maximum QTc interval adjusted according Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): 450\<= QTcF \<480, 480\<= QTcF \<500, and QTcF \>=500; QTcF maximum increase from baseline(msec): 30\<= change \<60, and change \>=60; 2) maximum PR interval (msec): \>=300; PR increase from baseline (msec): baseline \>200 with 25% increase at maximum, baseline \<=200 with 50% increase at maximum; 3) maximum QRS (msec): \>=140; QRS increase from baseline (msec) \>=50%. Baseline was defined as the average of the last triplicate measurement prior to the first dosing. ECG abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 337).
Secondary Outcomes (36)
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06817024 Following Single Dose in Part 1
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose on Day 1, and on Follow-up Days 8, 15, 32, 46, 61, 91, 121, 151, 181, 211, and at Extended Follow-Up visits (up to a maximum of 780 days/18720 hours post dose).
Cmax of PF-06817024 Following Multiple Doses in Part 1
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hr post dose on Day 1, Days 8 and 15, Day 31/46 (at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hr), Days 61, 91, 121, 151, 181, 211, 241, at Extended Follow-Up visits (up to a maximum of 645 days/15480 hr post dose).
Cmax of PF-06817024 in Part 2
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 96 hour post dose on Day 1, and Days 8, 15, 32, 61, 91, 121, 181, 211, and at Extended Follow-Up visits (up to a maximum of 690 days/16560 hours post dose).
Cmax of PF-06817024 in Part 3
On Day 1 (at pre-dose, 1.5, 4, and 168 hours post dose), and Days 29, 57, and 85 (at pre-dose, 1.5 and 4 hours post dose), and on Days 113, 253, 337, and Extended Follow-Up visits (up to a maximum of 882 days/21168 hours post dose on Day 85).
Dose Normalized Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax[dn]) of PF-06817024 Following Single Dose in Part 1
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose on Day 1, and on Follow-up Days 8, 15, 32, 46, 61, 91, 121, 151, 181, 211, and at Extended Follow-Up visits (up to a maximum of 780 days/18720 hours post dose).
- +31 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (13)
Cohort 1
EXPERIMENTAL10 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 2
EXPERIMENTAL30 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 3
EXPERIMENTAL100 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 4
EXPERIMENTAL300 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 5
EXPERIMENTAL1000 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 6
EXPERIMENTAL2000 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 7
EXPERIMENTAL30 mg subcutaneous dose of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 8
EXPERIMENTAL300 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 9
EXPERIMENTALIV dose to be determined of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 10
EXPERIMENTALPF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 11
EXPERIMENTALPF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 12
EXPERIMENTALPF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 13
EXPERIMENTALPF-06817024 or placebo
Interventions
Subjects will be given one dose of PF-06817024 intravenously
Subjects will be given one dose of placebo for PF-06817024 intravenously
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy male subjects, healthy female subjects of non-childbearing potential, 18-55 years of age (Part 1)
- Male subjects, female subjects of non-childbearing potential, female subjects of childbearing potential with documented bilateral tubal ligation (tubes tied) or bilateral salpingectomy (tubes removed), 18-65 years of age, and 2 of the following symptoms: nasal congestion/obstruction, nasal discharge, face pain/pressure,or reduction/loss of smell (Part 2)
- Male or female subjects between the ages of 18 and 75 years, inclusive with moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis, agree to avoid prolonged exposure to the sun and not to use tanning booths, sun lamps, or other ultraviolet light sources during the study (Part 3)
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically significant diseases (cardiac, psychiatric, autoimmune, renal, etc.), positive urine drug test, fever within 7 days of dosing, active infections within 28 days of dosing (Part 1 and 2 and 3)
- History of allergic reaction to topical lidocaine, nasal surgery within 6 months (Part 2)
- Exposure to live or attenuated vaccines, have skin conditions other than Atopic Dermatitis, use of JAK inhibitors and biologics (Part 3)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
Study Sites (20)
UC Davis Dermatology
Sacramento, California, 95816, United States
UC Davis CTSC Clinical Research Center
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
UC Davis Health
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
New Haven Clinical Research Unit
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, United States
Dermatology Physicians of Connecticut
Shelton, Connecticut, 06484, United States
ForCare Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33613, United States
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256, United States
Dawes Fretzin Dermatology Group, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256, United States
The Indiana Clinical Trials Center
Plainfield, Indiana, 46168, United States
Academic Dermatology
Edina, Minnesota, 55435, United States
Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402, United States
Ear, Nose & Throat Specialty Care of Minnesota, P.A.
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55404, United States
Prism Research, LLC
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55114, United States
Hassman Research Institute
Berlin, New Jersey, 08009, United States
Carolina Phase 1 Research, LLC
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute, PC
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136, United States
Health Concepts
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702, United States
Lee Medical Associates, PA
San Antonio, Texas, 78213, United States
Progressive Clinical Research, PA
San Antonio, Texas, 78213, United States
Virginia Clinical Research, Inc.
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States
Related Publications (2)
Danto SI, Tsamandouras N, Reddy P, Gilbert SA, Mancuso JY, Page K, Beebe JS, Peeva E, Vincent MS. Exploratory pharmacodynamics and efficacy of PF-06817024 in a Phase 1 study of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and atopic dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Aug 30;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00894-8.
PMID: 39215351DERIVEDDanto SI, Tsamandouras N, Reddy P, Gilbert S, Mancuso J, Page K, Peeva E, Vincent MS, Beebe JS. Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of PF-06817024 in Healthy Participants, Participants with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps, and Participants with Atopic Dermatitis: A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 May;64(5):529-543. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2360. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
PMID: 37772436DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2016
First Posted
April 19, 2016
Study Start
April 27, 2016
Primary Completion
March 9, 2021
Study Completion
March 9, 2021
Last Updated
May 19, 2022
Results First Posted
May 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.