Diffusion MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Using ADC (Apparent Diffusion Coefficient) Histograms in the Evaluation of Adnexal Tumor Aggressiveness
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using ADC (Apparent Diffusion Coefficient) Histograms in the Evaluation of Adnexal Tumor Aggressiveness
1 other identifier
observational
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Diffusion-weighted sequences have been routinely performed for years to study the pelvis. They have been so far mainly qualitatively interpreted, that is to say as the absence or presence of an hypersignal at a high b value. The quantitative analysis involves placing the region of interest (ROI) on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. The manual placement is very operator dependent, and does not reflect the entirety of the studied mass. In all fields of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, a multiparametric approach integrating diffusion analysis is flourishing. However, the quantitative analysis of the diffusion is still little studied for tumor heterogeneity analysis, including in the gynecological sphere. The investigators will therefore retrospectively evaluate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histograms, extracted from the diffusion ponderation sequences, of the magnetic imaging resonance analysis of adnexal masses and confront the results with the anatomo-pathology results, for patients having undergone surgery, and/or with the clinical and imagery follow-up results. The investigators goal will be to improve the performance of conventional MRI in the analysis of adnexal masses. The expected benefits of this study are:
- a correlation with the histology analysis or the clinical monitoring
- an improved prediction of the malignancy of the tumor
- an improved magnetic resonance imaging performance for adnexal masses, with better surgical therapeutic management
- an improved negative predictive value, thereby ultimately limiting unnecessary surgical explorations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2016
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2019
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
2.9 years
April 1, 2016
January 15, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the adnexal mass volume (mm2/sec)
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) expressed in mm2/sec. Magnetic resonance images realised with the Ingenia 3 Tesla Engine (Philips) and the Area 1,5 Tesla Engine (Siemens).Post-processing realized with the Syngo Onco Care application of Siemens.
From 01/01/2015 till the end of study (2 years)
Anatomo-pathology classification - histological type
Follow-up of the patients that did undergo surgery: histological type of tumor. The histological type of the tumor will be determined by the Anatomo-Pathology Department of the CHU Brugmann hospital, according to standard of care.
From 01/01/2015 till the end of study (2 years)
MRI Adnex score
Follow-up of the patients that did not undergo surgery: medical imaging classification of the adnexal mass (MRI Adnex score)
From 01/01/2015 till the end of study (2 years)
IOTA ultrasound classification
Follow-up of the patients that did not undergo surgery: transvaginal ultrasound classification of the adnexal masse (IOTA ultrasound classification)
From 01/01/2015 till the end of study (2 years)
Anatomo-pathology classification - malignancy grading of tumor
Follow-up of the patients that did undergo surgery: malignancy grading of the adnexal mass according to FIGO classification.
From 01/01/2015 till the end of study (2 years)
Study Arms (1)
Patients with MRI pelvic imaging
Women over 18 years old, having undergone a magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis within the CHU Brugmann Hospital
Interventions
Quantitative analysis of the magnetic resonance images realised with the Ingenia 3 Tesla Engine (Philips) and the Area 1,5 Tesla Engine (Siemens), based on the ADC cartography.The post-processing will be realized with the Syngo Onco Care application of Siemens, that allows an histogram analysis of the ADC of all sections of the adnexal mass, as opposed to a section per section approach with the Region of Interest (ROI) method. The results will be correlated with the clinical data regarding the adnexal mass: anatomo-pathology status (malignancy and aggressiveness of the tumor) and the gynecological follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
Women having undergone magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis within the CHU Brugmann hospital.
You may qualify if:
- \- Women aged over 18 years old, having undergone magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis within the CHU Brugmann hospital.
You may not qualify if:
- Examinations without diffusion sequences
- Examinations with incomplete diffusion sequences
- Absence of anato-pathologic result, or absence of gynecological clinical/imaging follow-up.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Brugmann
Brussels, 1020, Belgium
Related Publications (2)
Thomassin-Naggara I, Aubert E, Rockall A, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Rouzier R, Darai E, Bazot M. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system. Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):432-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121161. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
PMID: 23468574BACKGROUNDJust N. Improving tumour heterogeneity MRI assessment with histograms. Br J Cancer. 2014 Dec 9;111(12):2205-13. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.512. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
PMID: 25268373BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mieke Cannie, MD
CHU Brugmann
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nathalie Hottat, MD
CHU Brugmann
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of clinic
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2016
First Posted
April 19, 2016
Study Start
March 8, 2016
Primary Completion
January 30, 2019
Study Completion
January 30, 2019
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01