NCT02741713

Brief Summary

The standard practice for arthroscopic shoulder surgery at our institution is a general anesthetic with a long-acting interscalene block for post-operative pain control, which can reduce the amount of opiates needed after surgery. The interscalene block is effective in providing analgesia to the majority of the shoulder joint and has been shown to reduce post-operative pain scores after arthroscopic shoulder surgeries. However, there is a subset of arthroscopic shoulder surgery patients who have pain in the axilla even in the setting of a functioning interscalene brachial plexus nerve block. One of our surgeons has reported a high incidence of axillary pain in patients who undergo a sub-pectoral biceps tenodesis as part of their arthroscopic procedure. A newly described nerve block approach to the nerves that supply sensation to the axillary region called the PECS "Pectoralis" 1 \& 2 block may provide additional analgesia to these patients. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, observer and patient blinded, single-center, sham block trial is to determine if the addition of PECS blocks to an interscalene block will reduce the severity of axillary pain following arthroscopic shoulder surgery that involves a sub-pectoral biceps tenodesis. Secondarily, the study will assess the duration of PECS 1 \& 2 and whether the block reduces post-operative opioid usage. We hypothesize that the addition of the PECS 1 \& 2 block will reduce the severity of axillary pain at 6hrs and reduce postoperative narcotic usage for the first 24 hours.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2016

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2016

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 29, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 29, 2017

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 27, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 27, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

April 7, 2016

Results QC Date

June 28, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-operative Axillary Pain

    Post-operative ambulatory surgery subjects will be asked 6 hours after block placement about the presence of axillary pain at rest. Numerical Rating Scale scores (0-10) will be recorded with 0= no pain, 10=most pain possible. Higher scores denotes worse outcome.

    6 hours post-block.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (0-10) at Rest

    Assessed 24hrs post-block on a scale from 0-10.

  • Percentage of Participants With Episodes of Nausea or Vomiting

    Assessed 24hrs post-block (yes/no)

  • Total Opioid Usage

    Assessed 24hrs post-block in mg

  • Time From Block Placement to Onset of Axillary Pain

    Assessed 24hrs post-block in hours

Study Arms (2)

Interscalene Block plus Sham Block

SHAM COMPARATOR

Twenty subjects will receive an ultrasound guided interscalene nerve block using the Solution for Injection in Interscalene Block dosed at the upper trunk location near the 6th cervical vertebral level, per standard clinical practice. A Sham Block of in area of PECS "Pectoralis" block will be done to allow for assessment of the intervention. Using the Solution for Injection in Sham Block.

Procedure: Interscalene BlockProcedure: Sham BlockDrug: Solution for Injection in Interscalene BlockDrug: Solution for Injection in Sham Block

Interscalene plus PECS Blocks

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Twenty patients will receive an ultrasound guided interscalene nerve block Solution for Injection in Interscalene Block dosed at the upper trunk location near the 6th cervical vertebral level, per standard clinical practice. For the Intervention, these subjects will also a PECS "Pectoralis" 1 and 2 Blocks using the Solution for Injection PECS Blocks, dosed at the PECS1 location and PECS2 location as described by Blanco, et al.

Procedure: PECS "Pectoralis" 1 and 2 BlocksProcedure: Interscalene BlockDrug: Solution for Injection in Interscalene BlockDrug: Solution for Injection PECS Blocks

Interventions

An interscalene and a PECS "Pectoralis" 1 and 2 block will be performed on the subjects.

Interscalene plus PECS Blocks

An interscalene block will be performed on the subjects.

Interscalene Block plus Sham BlockInterscalene plus PECS Blocks
Sham BlockPROCEDURE
Interscalene Block plus Sham Block

20mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and 1:600,000 clonidine

Also known as: bupivacaine, epinephrine, clonidine
Interscalene Block plus Sham BlockInterscalene plus PECS Blocks

Lidocaine 1%

Also known as: Lidocaine
Interscalene Block plus Sham Block

10mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and 1:600,000 clonidine dosed at the PECS1 location and 20mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and 1:600,000 clonidine dosed at the PECS2 location

Also known as: bupivacaine, epinephrine, clonidine
Interscalene plus PECS Blocks

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults, between 18 and 80 years of age
  • Ability to take pills
  • Agreement to a regional with general anesthesia technique

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy to amide local anesthetics
  • Presence of a progressive neurological deficit
  • pre-existing coagulopathy
  • Current infection
  • Significant pulmonary disease contraindicating phrenic nerve blockade
  • Chronic use of an opioid analgesic (\>3 months of a combined total of more than 40mg oxycodone equivalents a day)
  • Inability to obtain ultrasound images of anatomy due to obesity.
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Reynolds JW, Henshaw DS, Jaffe JD, Dobson SW, Edwards CJ, Turner JD, Weller RS, Graves BR, Freehill MT. Analgesic Benefit of Pectoral Nerve Block II Blockade for Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2019 Aug;129(2):536-542. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004233.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

SolutionsInjectionsBupivacaineEpinephrineClonidineLidocaine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pharmaceutical PreparationsDrug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeuticsAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesEthanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsBiogenic MonoaminesBiogenic AminesCatecholaminesCatecholsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsImidazolinesImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsAcetanilides

Limitations and Caveats

Only 8 patients in the PECS group reported the onset of axillary pain at home, so that data set is very limited.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr.Jon Wells Reynolds
Organization
Wake Forest Baptist Health

Study Officials

  • J.Wells Reynolds, MD

    Wake Forest Baptist Health Department of Anesthesiology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2016

First Posted

April 18, 2016

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

June 29, 2017

Study Completion

June 29, 2017

Last Updated

August 27, 2018

Results First Posted

August 27, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations