Analgesic Benefit of PECS Blocks for Biceps Tenodesis Shoulder Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The standard practice for arthroscopic shoulder surgery at our institution is a general anesthetic with a long-acting interscalene block for post-operative pain control, which can reduce the amount of opiates needed after surgery. The interscalene block is effective in providing analgesia to the majority of the shoulder joint and has been shown to reduce post-operative pain scores after arthroscopic shoulder surgeries. However, there is a subset of arthroscopic shoulder surgery patients who have pain in the axilla even in the setting of a functioning interscalene brachial plexus nerve block. One of our surgeons has reported a high incidence of axillary pain in patients who undergo a sub-pectoral biceps tenodesis as part of their arthroscopic procedure. A newly described nerve block approach to the nerves that supply sensation to the axillary region called the PECS "Pectoralis" 1 \& 2 block may provide additional analgesia to these patients. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, observer and patient blinded, single-center, sham block trial is to determine if the addition of PECS blocks to an interscalene block will reduce the severity of axillary pain following arthroscopic shoulder surgery that involves a sub-pectoral biceps tenodesis. Secondarily, the study will assess the duration of PECS 1 \& 2 and whether the block reduces post-operative opioid usage. We hypothesize that the addition of the PECS 1 \& 2 block will reduce the severity of axillary pain at 6hrs and reduce postoperative narcotic usage for the first 24 hours.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Apr 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 29, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 27, 2018
CompletedAugust 27, 2018
July 1, 2018
1.2 years
April 7, 2016
June 28, 2018
July 27, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative Axillary Pain
Post-operative ambulatory surgery subjects will be asked 6 hours after block placement about the presence of axillary pain at rest. Numerical Rating Scale scores (0-10) will be recorded with 0= no pain, 10=most pain possible. Higher scores denotes worse outcome.
6 hours post-block.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (0-10) at Rest
Assessed 24hrs post-block on a scale from 0-10.
Percentage of Participants With Episodes of Nausea or Vomiting
Assessed 24hrs post-block (yes/no)
Total Opioid Usage
Assessed 24hrs post-block in mg
Time From Block Placement to Onset of Axillary Pain
Assessed 24hrs post-block in hours
Study Arms (2)
Interscalene Block plus Sham Block
SHAM COMPARATORTwenty subjects will receive an ultrasound guided interscalene nerve block using the Solution for Injection in Interscalene Block dosed at the upper trunk location near the 6th cervical vertebral level, per standard clinical practice. A Sham Block of in area of PECS "Pectoralis" block will be done to allow for assessment of the intervention. Using the Solution for Injection in Sham Block.
Interscalene plus PECS Blocks
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwenty patients will receive an ultrasound guided interscalene nerve block Solution for Injection in Interscalene Block dosed at the upper trunk location near the 6th cervical vertebral level, per standard clinical practice. For the Intervention, these subjects will also a PECS "Pectoralis" 1 and 2 Blocks using the Solution for Injection PECS Blocks, dosed at the PECS1 location and PECS2 location as described by Blanco, et al.
Interventions
An interscalene and a PECS "Pectoralis" 1 and 2 block will be performed on the subjects.
An interscalene block will be performed on the subjects.
20mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and 1:600,000 clonidine
Lidocaine 1%
10mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and 1:600,000 clonidine dosed at the PECS1 location and 20mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and 1:600,000 clonidine dosed at the PECS2 location
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults, between 18 and 80 years of age
- Ability to take pills
- Agreement to a regional with general anesthesia technique
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to amide local anesthetics
- Presence of a progressive neurological deficit
- pre-existing coagulopathy
- Current infection
- Significant pulmonary disease contraindicating phrenic nerve blockade
- Chronic use of an opioid analgesic (\>3 months of a combined total of more than 40mg oxycodone equivalents a day)
- Inability to obtain ultrasound images of anatomy due to obesity.
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Related Publications (1)
Reynolds JW, Henshaw DS, Jaffe JD, Dobson SW, Edwards CJ, Turner JD, Weller RS, Graves BR, Freehill MT. Analgesic Benefit of Pectoral Nerve Block II Blockade for Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2019 Aug;129(2):536-542. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004233.
PMID: 31136331DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Only 8 patients in the PECS group reported the onset of axillary pain at home, so that data set is very limited.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr.Jon Wells Reynolds
- Organization
- Wake Forest Baptist Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
J.Wells Reynolds, MD
Wake Forest Baptist Health Department of Anesthesiology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2016
First Posted
April 18, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 29, 2017
Study Completion
June 29, 2017
Last Updated
August 27, 2018
Results First Posted
August 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share