The Efficacy of Sentimag in Detection of Sentinel Node Biopsy
SMART
SMART Study: Sentimag Along With Routine Technique in Detection of Sentinel Node Biopsy
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the Sentimag/Sienna+ System (Sentimag®) in clinical routine practice. On the one hand this allows evaluation of the equivalence of the two techniques. On the other hand this ensures that patients do not experience any possible disadvantages by participating. The hypothesis behind this evaluation is that Sentimag is as efficient as conventional sentinel node mapping. The programme will compare the Sentimag® with the conventional sentinel lymph node detection with radioactive tracer combined with blue dye (in centres using the combined technique) and thereby determine whether the new technique is equivalent to the standard technique for SLNB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Sep 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 22, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedJune 6, 2019
April 1, 2019
1.6 years
April 5, 2016
June 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of successful sentinel node biopsies (SLNB, detection rate per patient) with either the magnetic or the standard technique
6 Months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Detection rate per node
6 Months
Malignancy rate: proportion of nodes and patients with a malignant result in the definite pathological analysis.
6 Months
Concordance rate: proportion of successful labelling with the standard and new technique per patient and per node
6 Months
Malignancy concordance: proportion of successful labelling with the standard and new technique per malignancy positive patients and nodes
6 Months
Study Arms (1)
Standard Procedure plus use of sentimag
OTHERDetection of the nodes carried out using the gamma probe and also the sentimag - all patients receive both diagnostic interventions
Interventions
The programme will compare the Sentimag with the conventional sentinel lymph node detection with radioactive tracer combined with blue dye (in centres using the combined technique) and thereby determine whether the new technique is equivalent to the standard technique for SLNB
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with primary breast cancer scheduled for Sentinel node biopsy;
- Patients who are clinically and radiologically node negative;.
- Patients aged ≥18 years at time of consent
- Patients are able and willing to give informed consent
- Ability and willingness to undertake all scheduled visits and assessments
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are currently Pregnantcy or lactatingon;
- Patients with metastatic cancer;
- Subject has a known hypersensitivity to blue dye;
- Patients with intolerance or hypersensitivity to iron oxide or dextran compounds;, or to Sienna+
- Patients who have iron overload disease;
- Patients who has a pacemaker or other implantable device in the chest wall or shoulder;
- Previous axilla surgery, or impaired lymphatic function
- Subject is deprived of liberty or under guardianship
- Subject is indicated or scheduled for post-operative MRI investigation of the breast
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trustlead
- Sysmex Medicalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Raghavan Vidya
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2016
First Posted
April 15, 2016
Study Start
September 22, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
June 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04