NCT02739425

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the Sentimag/Sienna+ System (Sentimag®) in clinical routine practice. On the one hand this allows evaluation of the equivalence of the two techniques. On the other hand this ensures that patients do not experience any possible disadvantages by participating. The hypothesis behind this evaluation is that Sentimag is as efficient as conventional sentinel node mapping. The programme will compare the Sentimag® with the conventional sentinel lymph node detection with radioactive tracer combined with blue dye (in centres using the combined technique) and thereby determine whether the new technique is equivalent to the standard technique for SLNB.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
104

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 5, 2016

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 15, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 22, 2016

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

June 6, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

April 5, 2016

Last Update Submit

June 5, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) tracer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of successful sentinel node biopsies (SLNB, detection rate per patient) with either the magnetic or the standard technique

    6 Months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Detection rate per node

    6 Months

  • Malignancy rate: proportion of nodes and patients with a malignant result in the definite pathological analysis.

    6 Months

  • Concordance rate: proportion of successful labelling with the standard and new technique per patient and per node

    6 Months

  • Malignancy concordance: proportion of successful labelling with the standard and new technique per malignancy positive patients and nodes

    6 Months

Study Arms (1)

Standard Procedure plus use of sentimag

OTHER

Detection of the nodes carried out using the gamma probe and also the sentimag - all patients receive both diagnostic interventions

Device: Sentimag Device

Interventions

The programme will compare the Sentimag with the conventional sentinel lymph node detection with radioactive tracer combined with blue dye (in centres using the combined technique) and thereby determine whether the new technique is equivalent to the standard technique for SLNB

Standard Procedure plus use of sentimag

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with primary breast cancer scheduled for Sentinel node biopsy;
  • Patients who are clinically and radiologically node negative;.
  • Patients aged ≥18 years at time of consent
  • Patients are able and willing to give informed consent
  • Ability and willingness to undertake all scheduled visits and assessments

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are currently Pregnantcy or lactatingon;
  • Patients with metastatic cancer;
  • Subject has a known hypersensitivity to blue dye;
  • Patients with intolerance or hypersensitivity to iron oxide or dextran compounds;, or to Sienna+
  • Patients who have iron overload disease;
  • Patients who has a pacemaker or other implantable device in the chest wall or shoulder;
  • Previous axilla surgery, or impaired lymphatic function
  • Subject is deprived of liberty or under guardianship
  • Subject is indicated or scheduled for post-operative MRI investigation of the breast

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust

Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Raghavan Vidya

    The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2016

First Posted

April 15, 2016

Study Start

September 22, 2016

Primary Completion

May 1, 2018

Study Completion

May 1, 2018

Last Updated

June 6, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Locations