Comparing the Diagnostic Yield of Radial EBUS Guided Biopsies When Using a Thick (1.7mm) Vs. Thin (1.4 mm) USS Probe.
R-EBUST2
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Obtaining a tissue sample to diagnose parenchymal lung lesions (PPL) suspected of cancerous origin is of utmost importance. Due to it's markedly favourable safety profile, a bronchoscopic biopsy method called Radial EBUS is becoming increasingly popular. However, a meta-analysis reports the success rate of Radial EBUS in diagnosis is 73%, which in comparison to CT guided biopsy which is the gold standard in diagnosing PPL (90% success rate), is sub-optimal. There are 2 types of USS probes used in the R-EBUS procedure. Whilst the thicker USS probe (1.7mm) is capable of accommodating larger biopsy instruments, the thinner USS probe could be advanced more peripherally to obtain a biopsy. Therefore identifying what type of USS probe is better for a given PPL will aid in improving the diagnostic yield. In this study, investigators compare these two types of probes in the ability to diagnose a PPL. The biopsy instruments used for both arms are forceps and cytology brush. For the thick USS arm, in addition, an aspiration needle will also be used. (The thin USS guide sheath is too small to accommodate an aspiration needle)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedApril 15, 2016
April 1, 2016
1.9 years
February 19, 2016
April 10, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparing the diagnostic yield (sensitivity) from the biopsies taken using the thick USS and Guide sheath to that of biopsies taken using the thin USS and Guide sheath.
A blinded pathologist will assess all samples from the thick USS arm and all samples from the thin USS arm separately and come to a conclusion as 1. To what biopsies give a diagnosis of malignancy and 2. Will decide what is the best sample in comparing all samples from both arms defined as " the highest number of malignant cells/hpf".
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Suitability of the biopsy samples from each arm to perform EGFR mutation testing.
18 months
Compare the procedure related bleeding and pneumothorax rates between the two arms.
18 months
Study Arms (2)
Thick USS (1.7mm) with use of additional aspiration needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORThin USS (1.4mm)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Radial EBUS is an endobronchial USS which is used to obtain biopsies from a peripheral lung mass.
The Radial USS probe comes in two sizes. A thick USS probe that is 1.7mm and the thin USS is 1.4mm in diameter.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient referred for R-EBUS as per routine management.
- Patient judged to be medically stable to give consent for this study.
You may not qualify if:
- INR\>1.5
- Platelets\<150.
- Hb\> 80g/l
- Liver function tests (AST/ALT) \<2 times upper limit of normal
- Neutrophil count \>1.0
- EGFR \>30ml/kg/min
- On anticoagulation, that cannot be withheld for the procedure, due to medical reasons (e.g. On-clopidogrel with recent drug-eluting stent placement.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Middlemore Hospital, Counties Manakau District Health Board
Auckland, Auckland, 2025, New Zealand
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Respiratory Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2016
First Posted
April 15, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 15, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share