Efficiency and Safety of a Procedural Sedation by Propofol on Terminally Ill Patients With Refractory Pain
PROPOPAL2
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Relieving symptoms of patients hospitalized in a palliative care unit is a priority. Although they receive appropriate care, they may still experience pain refractory to analgesia or/and to conservative treatment during care procedures. For instance, pain can be caused by the bandaging of carcinological or ischemic wounds, or by the mobilization of traumatic injuries which cannot be specifically treated. Although these types of situations are rare, they remain unacceptable, especially at the end of life. According to current recommendations, a short-term sedation treatment can be administered although detailed procedures for this type of sedation have not been very much documented. In reality, midalozam is often used in those cases but it has drawbacks, which is why the investigators have looked into alternatives. Propofol, which is already widely used in anesthesia and emergency medicine to manage painful procedures, seems to be an interesting molecule because of its pharmacological properties. It allows to quickly reach deep sedation and thus obtain a certain level of comfort for the patient, but also ensures a prompt awakening as soon as care procedures are over, which limits respiratory side effects. The results from a preliminary study encouraged us to go further and to present a prospective study conducted in multiple centers in order to evaluate the efficiency and safety of a procedural sedation administered by trained doctors who are not anesthesiologists on terminally ill patients with refractory pain hospitalized in a palliative care unit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 19, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 26, 2019
CompletedJune 4, 2024
November 1, 2023
2.4 years
March 31, 2016
June 3, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
success rate of care without severe pain for the patient
Success is defined as the administration of care without severe pain for the patient
from the beginning of sedation to 2 hours after sedation
success rate of care without major side effects
Major side effects are defined as ''Sentinel AEs'' by the World SIVA (Society of IntraVeinous Anesthesia) International Sedation Task Force
from the beginning of sedation to 2 hours after sedation
Study Arms (1)
Drug: sedation with propofol
EXPERIMENTALinduction with propofol at 20mg/kg/h. Then, when the patient is sleeping, dosage is decreased to 6 mg/kg/h
Interventions
induction with propofol at 20mg/kg/h. Then, when the patient is sleeping, dosage is decreased to 6 mg/kg/h
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient hospitalized in the palliative care unit
- Patient whose prognosis is three months or less life expectancy
- Patient treated with step 3 opioids
- Pain experienced during care procedures and refractory to transmucosal fentanyl and equimolar mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide if the latter is not contraindicated
- The pain scales used are Numeric Rating Scale ≥ 3/10 for patients able to communicate and Algoplus scale \> 2 for patients with inability to communicate verbally
- Indication of procedural sedation is agreed upon after collegial consultation and evaluation of the benefit risk balance (principle of double effect)
- Age: 18 and above
- Patient must be registered for social security
- Consent must be signed before and by the conscious patient or by his or her trusted person or relative for patients with cognitive impairments or disturbed vigilance
You may not qualify if:
- contra-indication to soya
- contra-indication to egg lecithin
- Respiratory insufficiency
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de Nice - Hôpital de l'Archet
Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, 06200, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Flora TREMELLAT, MD
Unité de Soins Palliatifs, CHU de Nice
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2016
First Posted
April 12, 2016
Study Start
May 19, 2017
Primary Completion
September 26, 2019
Study Completion
September 26, 2019
Last Updated
June 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share