NCT02731794

Brief Summary

The investigators designed the randomized prospective study to evaluate the differences of inflammatory response and clinical outcome after on-pump beating coronary artery bypass grafting undergoing left ventricular assist versus biventricular assist in patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2016

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2016

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2016

Completed
6.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 9, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6.4 years

First QC Date

March 20, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 6, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

cardiopulmonary bypasscoronary artery bypass graftinginflammatory responsecardiac dysfunction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes of C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Serial blood samples for inflammatory response of CRP were collected at the following time points: 1: induction of anesthesia, 2: upon termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), 3: 6 hours postoperatively, 4: 24 hours postoperatively, 5: 48 hours postoperatively, 6: 72 hours postoperatively.

    up tp 72 hours

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Incidence of atrial fibrillation

    10 days

  • Durations of mechanical ventilation

    10 days

  • The number for transfused packed red cells

    up to 10 days

  • Partial oxygen pressure/inspired oxygen fraction (P/F)

    up tp 10 days

  • Cardiac Troponin I (cTnI)

    up to72 hours

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

LVA group

EXPERIMENTAL

LVA group: left ventricular assist group.

Device: left ventricular assist

BiVA group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

BiVA group: Biventricular assist group.

Procedure: Biventricular assist

Interventions

In left ventricular assist group, 100 IU/kg heparin was given to activated clotting time (ACT) greater than 180 seconds. A 22 French arterial cannula (Maquet, Irrlingen, Germany) was introduced into the ascending aorta, and a 26 French cannula (Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) into the left atrium and advanced into the left ventricle. The two cannulas are directly connected through a short, heparin-coated circuit to a centrifuge pump (Maquet, Getinge Group, Germany). A flow of 1.0 to 4.0 L/min/m2 is obtained and mean blood pressure was maintained 55-75 mm Hg. Note: Both LVA group and BiVA group have the operative protocols itself,includes different prime fluid and cannula pathway. The investigators think it is inapplicable to assign the different operative protocols to the Treatment Arm.

LVA group

In biventricular assist group, the patients were routinely heparinized with a dose of 300 IU/kg heparin to ACT greater than 480 seconds. Cardiopulmonary bypass with a centrifuge pump (Maquet, Getinge Group, Germany) was established by 22 French aortic cannulation and 34 French two-stage venous cannula through the right atrial appendage. The extracorporeal circuit was primed with 2000 mL of lactated Ringer's solution, albumin, 25% mannitol and 5% NaHCO3. The flow was 1.0 to 4.0 L/min/m2 and mean blood pressure was maintained 55-75 mm Hg.

BiVA group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction with an ejection fraction (EF)≤40%, being scheduled for revascularization.

You may not qualify if:

  • myocardial infarction within the preceding 4 weeks
  • severe valve disease requiring valve replacement
  • cardiac reoperations

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Henan Provincial People' Hospital

Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, China

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Lim E, Drain A, Davies W, Edmonds L, Rosengard BR. A systematic review of randomized trials comparing revascularization rate and graft patency of off-pump and conventional coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Dec;132(6):1409-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.08.012.

  • Urso S, Sadaba JR, Pettinari M. Impact of off-pump to on-pump conversion rate on post-operative results in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;14(2):188-93. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr071. Epub 2011 Nov 28.

  • Fujii T, Watanabe Y, Shiono N, Kawasaki M, Yokomuro H, Ozawa T, Hamada S, Masuhara H, Teramoto T, Hara M, Katayanagi T, Sasaki Y, Koyama N. Assessment of on-pump beating coronary artery bypass surgery performed after introduction of off-pump approach. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Oct;12(5):324-32.

  • Erkut B, Dag O, Kaygin MA, Senocak M, Limandal HK, Arslan U, Kiymaz A, Aydin A, Kahraman N, Calik ES. On-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: early outcomes. Can J Surg. 2013 Dec;56(6):398-404. doi: 10.1503/cjs.018412.

  • Mazzei V, Nasso G, Salamone G, Castorino F, Tommasini A, Anselmi A. Prospective randomized comparison of coronary bypass grafting with minimal extracorporeal circulation system (MECC) versus off-pump coronary surgery. Circulation. 2007 Oct 16;116(16):1761-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.697482. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

  • Al Jaaly E, Chaudhry UA, Harling L, Athanasiou T. Should we consider beating-heart on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting over conventional cardioplegic arrest to improve postoperative outcomes in selected patients? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;20(4):538-45. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu425. Epub 2014 Dec 21.

  • Stassano P, Di Tommaso L, Monaco M, Iesu S, Brando G, Buonpane S, Ambrosio G, Di Benedetto G, Pepino P. Myocardial revascularization by left ventricular assisted beating heart is associated with reduced systemic inflammatory response. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jan;87(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.098.

  • Gulcan O, Turkoz R, Turkoz A, Caliskan E, Sezgin AT. On-pump/beating-heart myocardial protection for isolated or combined coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction: assessment of myocardial function and clinical outcome. Heart Surg Forum. 2005;8(3):E178-82; discussion E183. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20041166.

  • Ferrari E, Stalder N, von Segesser LK. On-pump beating heart coronary surgery for high risk patients requiring emergency multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Jul 2;3:38. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-3-38.

  • Folliguet TA, Philippe F, Larrazet F, Dibie A, Czitrom D, Le Bret E, Bachet J, Laborde F. Beating heart revascularization with minimal extracorporeal circulation in patients with a poor ejection fraction. Heart Surg Forum. 2002;6(1):19-23. doi: 10.1532/hsf.992.

Study Officials

  • Zhaoyun Cheng, MD

    Henan Provincial People' Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2016

First Posted

April 8, 2016

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion

October 1, 2022

Study Completion

October 1, 2023

Last Updated

March 9, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations