On-pump Beating Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting by Ventricular Assist
Inflammatory Response and Clinical Outcome After On-pump Beating Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using Left Ventricular Assist Versus Biventricular Assist in Patients With Severe Left Ventricle Dysfunction
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators designed the randomized prospective study to evaluate the differences of inflammatory response and clinical outcome after on-pump beating coronary artery bypass grafting undergoing left ventricular assist versus biventricular assist in patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2023
CompletedMarch 9, 2021
March 1, 2021
6.4 years
March 20, 2016
March 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes of C-reactive protein (CRP)
Serial blood samples for inflammatory response of CRP were collected at the following time points: 1: induction of anesthesia, 2: upon termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), 3: 6 hours postoperatively, 4: 24 hours postoperatively, 5: 48 hours postoperatively, 6: 72 hours postoperatively.
up tp 72 hours
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Incidence of atrial fibrillation
10 days
Durations of mechanical ventilation
10 days
The number for transfused packed red cells
up to 10 days
Partial oxygen pressure/inspired oxygen fraction (P/F)
up tp 10 days
Cardiac Troponin I (cTnI)
up to72 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LVA group
EXPERIMENTALLVA group: left ventricular assist group.
BiVA group
ACTIVE COMPARATORBiVA group: Biventricular assist group.
Interventions
In left ventricular assist group, 100 IU/kg heparin was given to activated clotting time (ACT) greater than 180 seconds. A 22 French arterial cannula (Maquet, Irrlingen, Germany) was introduced into the ascending aorta, and a 26 French cannula (Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) into the left atrium and advanced into the left ventricle. The two cannulas are directly connected through a short, heparin-coated circuit to a centrifuge pump (Maquet, Getinge Group, Germany). A flow of 1.0 to 4.0 L/min/m2 is obtained and mean blood pressure was maintained 55-75 mm Hg. Note: Both LVA group and BiVA group have the operative protocols itself,includes different prime fluid and cannula pathway. The investigators think it is inapplicable to assign the different operative protocols to the Treatment Arm.
In biventricular assist group, the patients were routinely heparinized with a dose of 300 IU/kg heparin to ACT greater than 480 seconds. Cardiopulmonary bypass with a centrifuge pump (Maquet, Getinge Group, Germany) was established by 22 French aortic cannulation and 34 French two-stage venous cannula through the right atrial appendage. The extracorporeal circuit was primed with 2000 mL of lactated Ringer's solution, albumin, 25% mannitol and 5% NaHCO3. The flow was 1.0 to 4.0 L/min/m2 and mean blood pressure was maintained 55-75 mm Hg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction with an ejection fraction (EF)≤40%, being scheduled for revascularization.
You may not qualify if:
- myocardial infarction within the preceding 4 weeks
- severe valve disease requiring valve replacement
- cardiac reoperations
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Henan Provincial People' Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, China
Related Publications (10)
Lim E, Drain A, Davies W, Edmonds L, Rosengard BR. A systematic review of randomized trials comparing revascularization rate and graft patency of off-pump and conventional coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Dec;132(6):1409-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.08.012.
PMID: 17140968RESULTUrso S, Sadaba JR, Pettinari M. Impact of off-pump to on-pump conversion rate on post-operative results in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;14(2):188-93. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr071. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
PMID: 22159253RESULTFujii T, Watanabe Y, Shiono N, Kawasaki M, Yokomuro H, Ozawa T, Hamada S, Masuhara H, Teramoto T, Hara M, Katayanagi T, Sasaki Y, Koyama N. Assessment of on-pump beating coronary artery bypass surgery performed after introduction of off-pump approach. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Oct;12(5):324-32.
PMID: 17095974RESULTErkut B, Dag O, Kaygin MA, Senocak M, Limandal HK, Arslan U, Kiymaz A, Aydin A, Kahraman N, Calik ES. On-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: early outcomes. Can J Surg. 2013 Dec;56(6):398-404. doi: 10.1503/cjs.018412.
PMID: 24284147RESULTMazzei V, Nasso G, Salamone G, Castorino F, Tommasini A, Anselmi A. Prospective randomized comparison of coronary bypass grafting with minimal extracorporeal circulation system (MECC) versus off-pump coronary surgery. Circulation. 2007 Oct 16;116(16):1761-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.697482. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
PMID: 17875971RESULTAl Jaaly E, Chaudhry UA, Harling L, Athanasiou T. Should we consider beating-heart on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting over conventional cardioplegic arrest to improve postoperative outcomes in selected patients? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;20(4):538-45. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu425. Epub 2014 Dec 21.
PMID: 25535178RESULTStassano P, Di Tommaso L, Monaco M, Iesu S, Brando G, Buonpane S, Ambrosio G, Di Benedetto G, Pepino P. Myocardial revascularization by left ventricular assisted beating heart is associated with reduced systemic inflammatory response. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jan;87(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.098.
PMID: 19101266RESULTGulcan O, Turkoz R, Turkoz A, Caliskan E, Sezgin AT. On-pump/beating-heart myocardial protection for isolated or combined coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction: assessment of myocardial function and clinical outcome. Heart Surg Forum. 2005;8(3):E178-82; discussion E183. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20041166.
PMID: 15937002RESULTFerrari E, Stalder N, von Segesser LK. On-pump beating heart coronary surgery for high risk patients requiring emergency multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Jul 2;3:38. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-3-38.
PMID: 18597673RESULTFolliguet TA, Philippe F, Larrazet F, Dibie A, Czitrom D, Le Bret E, Bachet J, Laborde F. Beating heart revascularization with minimal extracorporeal circulation in patients with a poor ejection fraction. Heart Surg Forum. 2002;6(1):19-23. doi: 10.1532/hsf.992.
PMID: 12611727RESULT
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Zhaoyun Cheng, MD
Henan Provincial People' Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2016
First Posted
April 8, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2023
Last Updated
March 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share