The Impact of Epilepsy Surgery on Dream Content
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prospective observational study on epilepsy patients undergoing partial brain resection surgery (i.e. anterior temporal lobectomy) to assess the change in dream content before and 3 months and 1 year after surgery using anonymized dream-recall questionnaires. A control group of epilepsy patients undergoing diagnostic depth electrodes placement will complete the same questionnaires pre- and postoperatively to asses the factor 'general anesthesia' as a potential confounder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2016
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2018
CompletedFebruary 20, 2020
February 1, 2020
2.3 years
April 2, 2016
February 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage Change of Dream Features Occurrence (i.e. dream content; MOST RECENT DREAM questionnaire) - both groups (ESx & control group)
Percentage change of the following dream features occurrences according to the Hall/Van de Castle system are considered: * Characters * Social Interactions * Aggression * Friendliness * Sexuality * Activities (walking, talking, seeing, thinking, etc.) * Success and Failure * Misfortune and Good Fortune * Emotions * Settings * Objects * Descriptive Elements (modifiers, time, negatives) The relative abundance of the dream content listed above will be expressed in percentage and postoperative changes compared to the preoperative baseline. Relative differences between the indicators will be determined and statistically tested for significance. The one indicator that turns out to be statistically different from the rest will be considered the primary outcome measure. For an example, compare Bentes et al. 2011.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Dream Content (MOST RECENT DREAM questionnaire) - ESx group
12 months
Other Outcomes (2)
Seizure frequency (ESx only)
3 and 12 months
Anti epileptic drugs (AED) usage (ESx only)
3 and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
ESx
Epilepsy patients undergoing elective surgical resection of brain tissue; study group: epilepsy surgery=ESx.
DE
Epilepsy patients undergoing elective depth electrodes insertion in general anesthesia; control group: depth electrodes=DE.
Interventions
Epilepsy surgery is a procedure that removes an area of the brain where seizures originate.
Depth electrodes are inserted for monitoring/mapping the subsurface levels of the brain for the surgical treatment of epilepsy.
Eligibility Criteria
Epilepsy patients undergoing elective surgical resection of brain tissue (study group: Epilepsy surgery=ESx) or depth electrode insertion in general anesthesia (control group=DE).
You may qualify if:
- All epilepsy patients (minimum age: 16 years) undergoing elective surgical resection of brain tissue (study group) or depth electrode insertion in general anesthesia (control group) that give written consent after thorough study information.
- Patients must be able to understand the study concept and willing/able to document their most recent dream in written.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to document their most recent dream in written (language barrier, illiteracy, low intelligence, mental disabilities). Age \<16 years.
- Relevant co-morbidities such as dementia, depression and other psychiatric disorders, Parkinson's disease.
- Previous cranial surgery in a relevant cortical area of the default dream network.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
London Health Sciences Center, University Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
Related Publications (6)
Domhoff GW, Schneider A. New rationales and methods for quantitative dream research outside the laboratory. Sleep. 1998 Jun 15;21(4):398-404. doi: 10.1093/sleep/21.4.398.
PMID: 9646385RESULTSchneider A, Domhoff GW. The Quantitative Study of Dreams. Retrieved December 13 2015: http://www.dreamresearch.net/.
RESULTDomhoff GW, Fox KC. Dreaming and the default network: A review, synthesis, and counterintuitive research proposal. Conscious Cogn. 2015 May;33:342-53. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
PMID: 25723600RESULTSolms M. Dreaming and REM sleep are controlled by different brain mechanisms. Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Dec;23(6):843-50; discussion 904-1121. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00003988.
PMID: 11515144RESULTInternational Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/. Accessed 1st of August 2015.
RESULTBentes C, Costa J, Peralta R, Pires J, Sousa P, Paiva T. Dream recall frequency and content in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011 Nov;52(11):2022-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03290.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
PMID: 22003885RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David A Steven, M.D.
London Health Science Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- David A. Steven, MD, MPH, FRCSC, FACS
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2016
First Posted
April 7, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Study Completion
June 30, 2018
Last Updated
February 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02