Ultrasonic Versus Monopolar Energy-based Surgical Device in Colpotomy
ULMOST
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the degree of surgical smoke obstructing vision and thermal damage caused by two different ESDs (ultrasonic versus monopolar ESD) in colpotomy during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2017
CompletedApril 3, 2019
April 1, 2019
1 year
March 29, 2016
April 1, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Degree of surgical smoke obstructing vision
The degree of surgical smoke obstructing laparoscopic view was assessed by an independent, blinded, gynecologic surgeon who reviewed videotapes of each patient's laparoscopic colpotomy procedure using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very clear; 2 = quite clear; 3 =somewhat smoky; 4 = quite smoky; and 5 = extremely smoky), and a higher score indicates a worse visuality
Day of surgery
Degree of lateral thermal damage
Using a light microscope, the width of lateral thermal damage was measured from the point of instrument application to the margins of unchanged nearby tissue
Day of surgery
Study Arms (2)
Ultrasonic ESD
EXPERIMENTALLaparoscopic colpotomy by ultrasonic ESD (Harmonic Synergy Hook Blade; Ethicon Endo-Surgery) during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Monopolar ESD
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparoscopic colpotomy by monopolar ESD (hook electrode with 90 watts of unmodulated current; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Interventions
In this intervention, laparoscopic colpotomy was performed by ultrasonic ESD (Harmonic Synergy Hook Blades; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA).
In this intervention, laparoscopic colpotomy was performed by monopolar ESD (hook electrode with 90 watts of unmodulated current; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- women with gynecologic diseases, such as uterine myoma, adenomyosis, and ovarian tumor;
- women who were planning to undergo TLH;
- women between 19 and 75 years of age.
You may not qualify if:
- women with any suggestion of malignant cervical or vaginal pathologies
- women with uncontrolled medical comorbidities or psychiatric illness, which could affect follow-up and/or compliance
- women who refused to participate or give consent to the procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Seoul, NJ, 03181, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Taejong Song, MD,PhD
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2016
First Posted
April 6, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2017
Study Completion
April 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 3, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share