Study Stopped
No participants enrolled
Comparison of Low Against High Regimen of Proton Pump Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
Low Dose Against High Dose of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Treatment Acute Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Evaluate the efficacy of Two different regimens of proton pump inhibitors High against Low in the management of acute peptic ulcer bleeding
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Dec 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2021
CompletedJuly 10, 2018
July 1, 2018
3.2 years
March 14, 2016
July 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mortality
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Rebleeding
one month
Surgery
one month
Length of hospital stay
one month
Blood transfusions
one month
Study Arms (2)
Omeprazole High dose
ACTIVE COMPARATOROmeprazole 80 mg loading dose,then 8mg/h IV continuous infusion for 3 days
Omeprazole Low Dose
EXPERIMENTALOmeprazole 80 mg loading dose IV then 40 mg two times per day IV for 3 days
Interventions
High regimen of Proton Pump Inhibitors in treatment of bleeding ulcer 80 mg loading dose then 8 mg/h iv for 3 days
low regimen of Proton Pump Inhibitors in treatment bleeding ulcer 80 mg loading dose then 40 mg two times per day for 3 days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- High risk ulcers defined according to the Forrest classification With respect to high-risk stigmata,
- active bleeding was defined as a continuous blood spurting (Forrest IA)
- oozing (Forrest IB) from the ulcer base.
- A non-bleeding visible vessel at endoscopy was defined as a discrete protuberance at the ulcer base(Forrest IIA).
- An adherent clot was one that was resistant to forceful irrigation or suction (Forrest IIB).
You may not qualify if:
- ulcer was malignant
- non ulcerative bleeding such as angiodysplasia , a Mallory-Weiss tear....
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Damascus Hospital
Damascus, +963, Syria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marouf Alhalabi, MD
Damascus Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2016
First Posted
March 31, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2017
Primary Completion
February 1, 2021
Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Last Updated
July 10, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07