Relative Bioavailability of AR10 Compared to Reference Product
Open Label, Randomized, Two-Arm, Single-Dose, Two-Period, Crossover Study to Determine the Relative Bioavailability of AR10 (Acetylcysteine Effervescent Tablets) Compared to Reference Product in Healthy, Adult Subjects, Fasting
1 other identifier
interventional
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the relative bioavailability of Acetylcysteine Effervescent Tablets (AR10) and Reference N-acetylcysteine. Patients will receive both products in an Open Label, Randomized, Two-Arm, Single-Dose, Two-Period, Crossover design.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1 healthy
Started Apr 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_1 healthy
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2016
CompletedMarch 30, 2016
March 1, 2016
1 month
March 17, 2016
March 29, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of Area Under the Curve (AUC) profiles of the two formulations of acetylcysteine to determine the Relative Bioavailability
To compare AUC of a single 11 gram dose of AR10 acetylcysteine effervescent tablets for oral solution (two 0.5 g and four 2.5 g), and the Reference Listed Drug (acetylcysteine solution; oral 20% \[200 mg/mL\] from American Pharmaceutical Partners) in a minimum of 24 healthy adult, human subjects under fasting conditions, to establish relative bioavailability.
10 days
Comparison of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) profiles of the two formulations of acetylcysteine to determine the Relative Bioavailability
To compare Cmax of a single 11 gram dose of AR10 acetylcysteine effervescent tablets for oral solution (two 0.5 g and four 2.5 g), and the Reference Listed Drug (acetylcysteine solution; oral 20% \[200 mg/mL\] from American Pharmaceutical Partners) in a minimum of 24 healthy adult, human subjects under fasting conditions, to establish relative bioavailability.
10 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The safety and tolerability of AR10 and the reference product, as measured by treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), concomitant medications, vital signs (pulse, temperature and respiratory rate), and assessment of well-being.
12 days
Other Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of subject preference between AR10 and the reference product using the adapted British Nutritional Foundation's Sensory Evaluation (2004) 5-point hedonic scale.
10 days
Evaluation of healthcare provider preference between AR10 and the reference product using the adapted British Nutritional Foundation's Sensory Evaluation (2004) 5-point hedonic scale
10 days
Study Arms (2)
AR10
EXPERIMENTALAR10 acetylcysteine effervescent tablets for oral solution (two 0.5 g and four 2.5 g)
acetylcysteine
ACTIVE COMPARATORacetylcysteine solution; oral 20% (200 mg/mL)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects (males or females) between 18 - 50 years of age inclusive.
- Body weight at least 154 pounds (70 kg) and a Body Mass Index no greater than 30 kg/m2.
- Healthy as determined by medical history, clinical examination, and laboratory examination performed within 30 days prior to admission for the first period of the study.
- Subjects willing and able to provide a written informed consent, HIPPA and to adhere to the protocol requirements.
- If female and of childbearing potential (defined as a pre-menopausal female who is biologically capable of becoming pregnant), the subject must agree to remain abstinent or practice a medically acceptable form of contraception from screening until the close out visit of the clinical study. Acceptable forms of contraception include intrauterine devices, implantable devices, and barrier methods. If a barrier method is chosen, a double barrier (e.g., condom plus foam) is required.
- Negative beta human chorionic gonadotropin test, consistent with no pregnancy (females only).
- Non-smokers
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity, allergy, idiosyncratic reaction or adverse reaction to acetylcysteine, its excipients, and other related compounds with similar chemical characteristics or any severe allergic reaction to any drug or multiple food/drug allergies.
- History or current evidence of clinically significant medical condition including, but not limited to, hepatic, renal, cardiac, vascular, gastrointestinal, or thyroid disease, diabetes, epilepsy, respiratory or hematological disease, acute narrow angle glaucoma, or psychiatric disorder that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, would confound the study results or present a risk to the subject.
- Subjects are to be without symptoms of nausea and/or vomiting. Subjects with a history of chronic nausea/vomiting are excluded. Subjects who had an acute illness/condition and have not had any nausea and/or vomiting episodes in the past two weeks may be screened provided they are medically cleared from the acute illness/condition involving nausea and/or vomiting episode(s).
- Existence of any surgical or medical condition that in the judgment of Principal Investigator might interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or elimination of the investigational product.
- Any clinically significant abnormality in the electrocardiogram (12 lead ECG).
- Laboratory values that are considered clinically significant (clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation, urinalysis, or pregnancy test) - Note: In the event of any parameter lying outside of the normal range, the sample may be repeated once. This value will be accepted if it lies within the normal range.
- Consumption of grapefruit juice/grapefruit within 14 days prior to Period I admission.
- Use of alcohol or caffeine containing products within 72 hours of each dose of °History or presence of alcoholism or drug abuse within 1 year of study participation.
- Known or suspected carcinoma.
- Presence of the disease markers of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 or 2, and hepatitis B or C viruses.
- Positive serum test for drug(s) of abuse testing (amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, tetrahydrocannabinol, morphine, and cocaine, and alcohol).
- History of intake/administration of any investigational treatment in a clinical study within the last 30 days prior to the onset of the study admission in Period I.
- History of significant blood loss (≥ 350 mL) due to any reason, including blood donation, within the last 12 weeks prior to admission in Period I of the study.
- Intake/administration of any enzyme-modifying drugs or drugs that might increase or decrease acetylcysteine levels within 30 days of investigational product administration, or over-the-counter (OTC) drugs including vitamins and natural supplements within 21 days of the first dose of Investigational Product administration and throughout study unless approved by the Principal Investigator or Sponsor.
- Requirement of special diet preventing consumption of standard, healthy meals during the in-clinic portions of the study. In such cases, subject selection will be at the discretion of the Principal Investigator in discussion with Medical Monitor, if required.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Greene SC, Noonan PK, Sanabria C, Peacock WF. Effervescent N-Acetylcysteine Tablets versus Oral Solution N-Acetylcysteine in Fasting Healthy Adults: An Open-Label, Randomized, Single-Dose, Crossover, Relative Bioavailability Study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2016 Jun 27;83:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2016.06.001. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27668024DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tania D Johnson, RN, BSN
Arbor Pharmaceuticals
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2016
First Posted
March 30, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 30, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share