Ring Versus Suture Annuloplasty For Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation In Rheumatic Mitral Valve Diseases
Comparison Between Outcomes Of Ring And Suture Annuloplasty For Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation In Rheumatic Mitral Valve Diseases
1 other identifier
interventional
86
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare whether De Vega's Suture annuloplasty is equally effective in reducing the progression of Functional Tricuspid regurgitation as that claimed for Ring annuloplasty in Rheumatic Heart Disease patients with concurrent Mitral valve replacement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 29, 2016
March 1, 2016
10 months
March 16, 2016
March 22, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in severity of FTR
Definitions: 1. Improvement in FTR: refers to Mild or No TR 2. Tricuspid regurgitation is graded as mild, moderate, and severe based on regurgitant jet area i. \<5cm2 = Mild ii. 6-10cm2 = Moderate iii. \>10cm2 = Severe
within 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Mortality
up to 3 months of intervention
Study Arms (2)
Group R (ring)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in Group R will undergo tricuspid ring annuloplasty
Group S (suture)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in Group S will undergo De Vega's suture annuloplasty
Interventions
Patients will undergo repair of tricuspid regurgitation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The participants will be all patients between 15 to 75 years of age group diagnosed as a case of Rheumatic Mitral Valve disease with moderate to severe functional Tricuspid regurgitation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with organic Tricuspid Valve (TV) lesion diagnosed in Echocardiography
- Patient with FTR requiring Mitral Valve repair
- Patient with FTR requiring concomitant aortic valve replacement
- Patient with FTR secondary to pathology other than Mitral valve disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre
Kathmandu, Bagmati, 44606, Nepal
Related Publications (8)
Tang GH, David TE, Singh SK, Maganti MD, Armstrong S, Borger MA. Tricuspid valve repair with an annuloplasty ring results in improved long-term outcomes. Circulation. 2006 Jul 4;114(1 Suppl):I577-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001263.
PMID: 16820641BACKGROUNDGuenther T, Mazzitelli D, Noebauer C, Hettich I, Tassani-Prell P, Voss B, Lange R. Tricuspid valve repair: is ring annuloplasty superior? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jan;43(1):58-65; discussion 65. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs266. Epub 2012 May 24.
PMID: 22627660BACKGROUNDSarralde JA, Bernal JM, Llorca J, Ponton A, Diez-Solorzano L, Gimenez-Rico JR, Revuelta JM. Repair of rheumatic tricuspid valve disease: predictors of very long-term mortality and reoperation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Aug;90(2):503-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.105.
PMID: 20667339BACKGROUNDRivera R, Duran E, Ajuria M. Carpentier's flexible ring versus De Vega's annuloplasty. A prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Feb;89(2):196-203.
PMID: 3881631BACKGROUNDBadano LP, Muraru D, Enriquez-Sarano M. Assessment of functional tricuspid regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 2013 Jul;34(25):1875-85. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs474. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
PMID: 23303656BACKGROUNDRogers JH, Bolling SF. The tricuspid valve: current perspective and evolving management of tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation. 2009 May 26;119(20):2718-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.842773.
PMID: 19470900RESULTMcCarthy PM, Bhudia SK, Rajeswaran J, Hoercher KJ, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Blackstone EH. Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Mar;127(3):674-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.11.019.
PMID: 15001895RESULTNavia JL, Nowicki ER, Blackstone EH, Brozzi NA, Nento DE, Atik FA, Rajeswaran J, Gillinov AM, Svensson LG, Lytle BW. Surgical management of secondary tricuspid valve regurgitation: annulus, commissure, or leaflet procedure? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jun;139(6):1473-1482.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.02.046. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
PMID: 20394950RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marisha Aryal, MBBS
Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident, Cardiac Surgery Dept.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2016
First Posted
March 29, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03