NCT02721290

Brief Summary

In this study, we will be comparing two approaches to the femoral block. The first or classical approach and one that is the most popular in our institution is used by combining ultrasound guidance and neurostimulator to do the block. The second is performed with the ultrasound alone aiming at the inferolateral aspect of the femoral artery with the needle and injecting. The primary endpoint of the study is the sensitive cutaneous block distribution using both techniques.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 15, 2016

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 29, 2016

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 30, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4.9 years

First QC Date

March 15, 2016

Last Update Submit

August 29, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Knee surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sensitive cutaneous block distribution area for the two techniques

    After performance of a femoral nerve block, ice will be applied on the skin to plot the anesthetized area at times 15, 30 and 45 mn. The sensation will be compared on a scale from 0 (no sensation) to 2 (no anesthesia) with the contralateral leg. An area in cm2 will be calculated for each of the patients and the two techniques will then be compared.

    45 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Time of block completion

    45 minutes

  • Ease of ultrasound visualization of the femoral nerve

    45 minutes

  • Ease of ultrasound visualization of the femoral artery

    45 minutes

  • Numbers of needle redirection

    45 minutes

  • Vascular puncture

    45 minutes

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Femoral nerve block using Ultrasound and neurostimulator

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Femoral block using the standard technique of ultrasound for femoral nerve identification and neurostimulator set at between 0.3-0.5 mA with quads muscle response for needle placement confirmation before injecting 20cc of Ropivacaine 0.5%.

Procedure: Femoral nerve block using Ultrasound and neurostimulatorDrug: Ropivacaine 0.5%

Femoral nerve block using femoral artery target

EXPERIMENTAL

Femoral block using the alternate technique of aiming for the inferolateral aspect of the femoral artery and injecting 20cc of Ropivacaine 0.5%.

Procedure: Femoral nerve block using UltrasoundDrug: Ropivacaine 0.5%

Interventions

Femoral nerve block using Ultrasound and neurostimulator
Femoral nerve block using femoral artery target

Ropivacaine 0.5% (20cc total) will be injected for the performance of the block in the two arms of the study.

Femoral nerve block using Ultrasound and neurostimulatorFemoral nerve block using femoral artery target

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for an elective surgery for which the anesthesiologist planned to do a single shot or continuous femoral nerve block.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any contraindication to the femoral nerve block (coagulopathy, infection, pre-existing neuropathy, local anesthetic allergy and refusal of local anesthesia).
  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Inability to understand or communicate the effect of local anesthesia secondary to the femoral nerve bloc.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4, Canada

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Issam Tanoubi, MD

CONTACT

Cédric Godbout-Simard, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2016

First Posted

March 29, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2020

Study Completion

December 1, 2020

Last Updated

August 30, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Locations