Study Stopped
Business Decision
Study of SANTYL® vs Hydrogel (SoloSite®) for Pressure Ulcers
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Enzymatic Debridement of Pressure Ulcers With Clostridial Collagenase Ointment (SANTYL®) or Hydrogel (SoloSite®)
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to compare SANTYL® versus hydrogel (SoloSite®) in the treatment of pressure ulcers for participants in a long-term care facility. After meeting study criteria, participants will be randomly assigned for application of SANTYL® or SoloSite® to their pressure ulcer for up to 6 weeks. A study previously conducted showed that in the long-term care setting, the removal of dead skin (debridement) with SANTYL® resulted in more participants achieving complete debridement, more rapidly than when SoloSite® is used. The goal of the present study is to confirm the results of the earlier study, demonstrating superior debridement outcomes for pressure ulcers of patients in long-term care as compared to ulcers managed with SoloSite®.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Aug 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 9, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 9, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 10, 2020
CompletedMarch 10, 2020
February 1, 2020
7 months
March 18, 2016
February 25, 2020
February 25, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Ulcers With Complete Debridement
For purposes of the primary analysis, the status of complete debridement was to be assessed from photographs by two independent reviewers.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Time in Days to Complete Debridement
6 weeks
Percentage Reduction in Non-viable Tissue
6 weeks
Percentage Reduction in Ulcer Area
6 weeks
Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) Score
6 weeks
Wound Bed Sore (WBS) Score
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Santyl
EXPERIMENTALSantyl collagenase ointment applied topically once per day for up to six weeks
SoloSite®
ACTIVE COMPARATORSOLOSITE is a hydrogel wound dressing with preservatives. It can donate moisture to rehydrate non-viable tissue. It absorbs exudate while retaining its structure in the wound.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provide written informed consent, which will consist of reading, signing, and dating the informed consent document after the Investigator, sub-Investigator or other designated study staff member has explained the study procedures, risks, and contact information.
- Eighteen (18) years of age or older, of either sex, and of any race.
- Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments.
- Subject is in-patient in a long-term care facility.
- A pressure ulcer present with a surface area ≥ 1.0 cm2 and ≤ 64.0 cm2 confirmed using the ImageIQ EDCIQ mobile imaging system. Only one qualifying ulcer per subject will be selected for the study (selection based on greatest clinical need, as assessed by the Investigator).
- The target ulcer must present with ≥85% necrotic, nonviable tissue as assessed by two independent image reviewers.
- The target ulcer has not been previously treated with hydrogel (SoloSite®) or with SANTYL®. Prior ulcers at or near the same location may have been treated with these products.
- No current infections requiring treatment with antibiotics (antibiotic use is permitted for the purpose of urinary tract infection prophylaxis, but this must be explicitly stated in the subject's chart).
- Acceptable state of health and nutrition with pre-albumin levels of ≥ 10 mg/dL (0.10 g/L), per the Screening local lab report. This is not required if a pre-albumin test within range has been conducted within the last 30 days.
- A hemoglobin A1c \< 7.9% per the Screening local lab report. This is not required if a hemoglobin A1c test within range has been conducted within the last 30 days.
- Have adequate pressure redistribution to the affected area or off-loading if the ulcer is on a lower extremity.
- No known allergies or sensitivities to either test article or the dressings.
- Women of child-bearing potential (those who are not premenarchal, not surgically sterilized \[hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy\], or not post-menopausal), may participate in the study if they meet the following condition:
- A negative urine pregnancy test at screening
You may not qualify if:
- Undergoing therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Study Visit 1, or planned participation overlapping with this study.
- Current oral steroid treatment with a daily dose exceeding 5 mg.
- Inability to comply with off-loading.
- If the ulcer is on a lower extremity, inadequate arterial blood flow to the affected limb as evidenced by an ankle brachial index (ABI) \<0.85.
- Presence of callus requiring surgical debridement within 3 days of Study Visit 1.
- Target ulcer with exposure of tendon, muscle or bone.
- Medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude safe subject participation in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Unknown Facility
Lee's Summit, Missouri, 64086, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Due to the early termination of the study by the sponsor and the number of subjects enrolled, data were not analyzed or summarized and were only listed by subject. The safety and efficacy of Santyl could not be assessed based on this study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Natasha Schappell, Clinical Study Manager
- Organization
- Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Herbert B Slade, MD
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jaime E Dickerson, PhD
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martha Kelso, RN
Wound Care Plus
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2016
First Posted
March 24, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 9, 2017
Study Completion
March 9, 2017
Last Updated
March 10, 2020
Results First Posted
March 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02