Comparison Between Isotonic 1 Repetition Maximum Measurement With Isometric Muscle Strength Testing In Healthy Females
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
1 repetition maximum (RM) and Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) with digital dynamometer are popular method of measuring muscle strength. The types of muscle contraction involved in both are different, 1RM involves isotonic muscle contraction (ITMC) and MVC with digital dynamometer involves isometric muscle contraction (IMMC). There are several risks involved in measurement of 1RM, such as delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and unsafe for pathological joints etc, this can be reduced if IMMC is used in measuring strength. Though both cannot be equated as they are different type of contraction, therefore the purpose of this study was to compare between 1RM measurement and isometric MVC using a digital hand-held dynamometer in healthy females. Twenty nine young females (mean age = 20.77 ± 1.28) without any weight training experience (mean BMI = 20.43 ± 1.85) volunteered for the study. It was a crossover trial where 48 hours of rest period was given between each measurement technique. The result showed moderate correlations (r = 0.365-0.847) between 1RM and MVC. A simple linear regression analysis revealed a significant estimated regression equation for dominant and non-dominant hands. \[Dominant, Y=0.391x + 1.472; Non-Dominant, Y=0.251x + 2.629; (Y: 1RM, x: Isometric)\] with low standard error of estimation value of (Dominant, 0.74; Non-dominant, 0.80). The result also showed no significant difference between these derived equations and Brzycki 1RM prediction equation. Therefore, it was concluded that both prediction equations can be used interchangeably to predict the strength of a person, and thus IMMC can be used to predict 1RM in healthy females.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2016
CompletedMarch 28, 2016
March 1, 2016
2.2 years
February 6, 2016
March 25, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analogue Scale
1 minute after Exercise
Study Arms (2)
isometric muscle strength
EXPERIMENTALisometric muscle strength was measured with a digital hand-held dynamometer. The digital hand-held dynamometer was held by the therapist against the flexor aspect of the distal forearm of the subject, on the wrist joint. Subject was asked to maintain the position and a break test was done with progressive loading of 5 seconds given by the tester. The peak isometric strength was recorded by a second tester at the end of 5 seconds. A standardised instructions and verbal encouragement was given to the subject for motivation. Subject as well as the tester was blinded to the values recorded on the digital hand-held dynamometer. An average of three measurements (with a rest period of 4 minutes in between each trial session) was recorded for the analysis. After each trial session, the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) was asked to the subject using the "1-10 Borg rating of perceived exertion scale"
1RM measurement of muscle strength
EXPERIMENTAL1RM measurement was done using the Brzycki 1RM prediction equation. In first testing session, subject was instructed to perform a general warm up for 5 minutes. Thereafter, the subject was asked to perform 10 repetitions of the movement using the amount of resistance that the subject felt she will be able to lift for only less than 10 times. The selection of the weight is made based on a list of weights provided (1kg to 10kg). When the subject performed the movement for 10 times or more, then the resistance was increased 1kg at a time, until the subject can perform only 9 or fewer repetitions of the movement correctly throughout the range of motion. A 3 minutes rest period was given to the subject before the new attempt was done with the increased weight. A standardized verbal encouragement was provided for motivation
Interventions
isometric muscle strength 1RM measurement of muscle strength
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy females
You may not qualify if:
- musculoskeletal and neurological disorder
- history of high blood pressure
- heart disease
- rheumatologic disease that affected the mobility
- unstable cardio respiratorydisorder
- cardiovascular disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Manisha
Kajang, Selangor, 43000, Malaysia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2016
First Posted
March 24, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 28, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share