Fast Versus Slow Tenaculum Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
121
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to investigate whether the speed of tenaculum placement affects perceived patient pain during office transcervical procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 11, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 6, 2017
CompletedMarch 21, 2018
March 1, 2018
11 months
November 17, 2015
March 19, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain with tenaculum placement assessed using a VAS scale
Subjects will record their pain on a paper VAS scale at the time of the procedure only. This is the only data collection point for this measure.
procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Overall pain perception assessed using a VAS scale
procedure
Provider perception of patient pain assessed using a VAS scale
procedure
Study Arms (2)
Fast placement
NO INTERVENTIONPlacement of the tenaculum quickly and without avoiding ratchet
Slow placement of the tenaculum
EXPERIMENTALPlacement of the tenaculum over a 7-10 second time frame and not allowing the tenaculum to ratchet audibly.
Interventions
Slow placement of the tenaculum on the cervix
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old and older
- Clinic provider plans a transcervical procedure (IUD placement or endometrial biopsy)
- English speaking and able to consent
You may not qualify if:
- Incarcerated
- Prior LEEP (loop electrosurgical excision procedure), cryo (cryotherapy) or CKC (cold knife cone) of the cervix
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abbey J Hardy-Fairbanks, MD
University of Iowa
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2015
First Posted
March 23, 2016
Study Start
April 11, 2016
Primary Completion
March 6, 2017
Study Completion
March 6, 2017
Last Updated
March 21, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03