Comparison of Different Massage Techniques Plus Conservative Applications in Low Back Pain
Assistant Professor
1 other identifier
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare of different massage techniques plus conservative aplications in low back pain treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 low-back-pain
Started Mar 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2016
CompletedMarch 22, 2016
March 1, 2016
6 months
March 12, 2016
March 16, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in low back pain intensity as measured by Visual Analog Scale
Change from baseline low back pain intensity at 2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in quality of life as assessed by Short Form-36
Change from baseline quality of life at 2 weeks
Change in functional statue as assessed by Oswestry Disability Index
Change from baseline functional statue at 2 weeks
Change in psychologic statue as assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Change from baseline psychologic statue at 2 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Connective tissue massage group
EXPERIMENTALConnective tissue massage plus conservative applications including superficial thermal, electrotherapy and home exercise program were applied
Classic massage group
ACTIVE COMPARATORClassic massage plus conservative applications including superficial thermal, electrotherapy and home exercise program were applied
Sham massage group
SHAM COMPARATORSham massage plus conservative applications including superficial thermal, electrotherapy and home exercise program were applied
Interventions
Connective tissue massage and conservative aplications were applied 5 days per week for a total of 10 sessions for 2 weeks.
Classic massage and conservative aplications were applied 5 days per week for a total of 10 sessions for 2 weeks.
Sham massage and conservative aplications were applied 5 days per week for a total of 10 sessions for 2 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having non specific low back pain without any relevant ongoing pathologies such as disc prolapse, spondylolisthesis, fractures, tumor, osteoporosis, infection
- Willing to participate
You may not qualify if:
- Spinal surgery in the past 6 months or having to undergo surgery or invasive examinations during the study;
- neurological disease;
- psychiatric disease;
- serious chronic disease that could interfere with the outcomes (e.g., cardiovascular disease, epilepsy, rheumatoid arthritis),
- pregnant during the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ataturk Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, Cankaya, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2016
First Posted
March 22, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03