Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam Sedation for Endobronchial Ultrasound
Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam Sedation in Patients Undergoing Convex-probe Endobronchial Ultrasound: a Randomized Double Blind Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
197
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The randomized controlled trial will compare efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine to midazolam for sedation during endobronchial ultrasound
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 17, 2017
February 1, 2017
11 months
January 20, 2016
February 16, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of midazolam boluses administered to achieve targeted Ramsay sedation score of two
From start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Mean difference in depth of sedation during procedure as assessed by Ramsay scale
From start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours
Frequency of adverse hemodynamic events - hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia
From start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours
Frequency of respiratory events - hypoxia, need for air airway maneuvers to maintain oxygenation
From start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours
Mean difference in patient and physician satisfaction related to procedure as assessed by visual analogue scale
Immediately after endobronchial ultrasound procedure
Mean difference in time taken to discharge patient from post-procedure recovery room
From end of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until final patient discharge from recovery room, assessed up to twelve hours
Study Arms (2)
Dexmedetomidine
EXPERIMENTALDexmedetomidine + fentanyl before, and dexmedetomidine infusion during, procedure
Midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORMidazolam + fentanyl before, and matching saline infusion during, procedure
Interventions
Dexmedetomidine 1µg/Kg in 100 mL saline intravenously over 10-15 minutes immediately prior to procedure, followed by Dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.6 µg/kg/hour as maintenance dose during entire procedure
100 mL saline infusion over 10-15 minutes immediately prior to procedure
Rescue boluses of 0.5 mg midazolam, if needed during procedure
1 µg/kg fentanyl as slow intravenous bolus immediately prior to procedure
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or more
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II
- Presence of hilar and/or mediastinal lymph nodes on thoracic CT scan
You may not qualify if:
- Known allergy to dexmedetomidine or midazolam or fentanyl
- Documented coagulopathy
- Pregnancy
- Hemodynamic instability (hypotension, arrhythmia, recent acute coronary event)
- Neuropsychiatric illness
- History of previous endobronchial ultrasound procedure
- Refusal to provide consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160023, India
Related Publications (1)
Kumari R, Jain K, Agarwal R, Dhooria S, Sehgal IS, Aggarwal AN. Fixed dexmedetomidine infusion versus fixed-dose midazolam bolus as primary sedative for maintaining intra-procedural sedation during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a double blind randomized controlled trial. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021 Dec;15(12):1597-1604. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1918000. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
PMID: 33849367DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Pulmonary Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2016
First Posted
March 18, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 17, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02