Study Stopped
recruitment challenge
Comparing Pregnancy Outcomes in Good Prognosis Patients Between Fresh and 'Freeze-All' Single Blastocyst Transfers
Pregnancy Outcomes in Good Prognosis Patients Utilizing Fresh Single Blastocyst Transfer vs. 'Freeze-All' and Delayed Frozen Single Blastocyst Transfer
1 other identifier
interventional
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the chances of becoming pregnant are better when day the single best day 5 embryo (blastocyst) resulting from an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle is transferred into the uterus immediately, or after freezing the embryo and transferring it into the uterus in a subsequent cycle, separate from the ovarian stimulation used in the IVF cycle. The investigators hypothesize that in good-prognosis patients, vitrified-warmed elective single embryo transfer will result in higher implantation, clinical and on-going pregnancy and live birth rates than fresh elective single embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 26, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 26, 2018
CompletedMarch 29, 2018
March 1, 2018
2.6 years
September 9, 2015
March 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ongoing pregnancy rate
Ongoing pregnancy is a pregnancy with a positive heart beat beyond 12 weeks of gestation.
12 weeks of gestation
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Implantation rate
4-5 weeks after date of embryo transfer
Clinical pregnancy rate
4-5 weeks after date of embryo transfer
Cumulative implantation rate
4-5 weeks after date of blastocyst transfer
Cumulative clinical pregnancy rate
4-5 weeks after the date of blastocyst transfer
Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate
12 weeks of gestation for each pregnancy achieved
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Freeze-All Protocol
EXPERIMENTALParticipants freezing all good quality embryos, with subsequent frozen embryo transfer of best quality blastocyst.
Fresh Protocol
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receiving fresh embryo transfer of best quality blastocyst and freezing of all good quality supernumerary embryos.
Interventions
All good morphologic quality blastocysts are vitrified on day 5 or 6. The best quality vitrified blastocyst frozen on day 5 will be warmed and transferred in a subsequent cycle.
Participants receive fresh embryo transfer of best morphologic quality blastocyst on day 5 and vitrification of all good quality supernumerary blastocysts.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First IVF cycle
- Normal ovarian reserve parameters (antral follicle count \> 12, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) \< 10 IU/L, AMH (if measured) \> 15 pmol/L)
- Infertility cause due to tubal factor, male factor with ejaculated sperm or unexplained
- or more fresh transfer or cryopreservation-quality blastocysts on day 5 post-oocyte-retrieval
- GnRH antagonist or long GnRH agonist cycles
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of (or evidence for significant risk of) ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) on post-oocyte-retrieval day 5 (in which the standard protocol is not to perform a fresh embryo transfer, but rather to freeze all blastocysts for future frozen embryo transfers).
- Use of a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger for ovulation and resulting intensive luteal phase support protocol.
- Women requiring automatic freeze-all approaches (such as for pre-implantation genetic testing or cryopreservation for fertility preservation).
- Female infertility causes that may adversely affect implantation, such as severe endometriosis, fibroids, mullerian abnormalities, or prior uterine procedures resulting in a potentially compromised endometrial cavity.
- In-vitro maturation of oocytes
- Oocyte donation cycles
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2Z5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ellen Greenblatt, MD CM
Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jason E Elliott, MD, MSc
Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor; Head - Division of Reproductive Sciences; Clinical Director - Centre for Fertility and Reproductive Health
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2015
First Posted
March 18, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 26, 2018
Study Completion
March 26, 2018
Last Updated
March 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03