Limiting Emergence Phenomena After General Anesthesia With Combined LMA and ETT Airway Management Technique
LEPAGA
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Emergence from general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway compared with an endotracheal tube has been shown to favorable with respect to limiting emergence phenomena such as coughing, straining, restlessness, and sympathetic stimulation leading to hypertension and tachycardia. Many anesthesiologists would prefer the use of an ETT to an LMA in cases in which higher ventilation pressures may be required, in those patients who are perceived to be high risk for reflux and pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents, as well as during cases that allow the anesthesiologist to have little accessibility the airway. The aim of this study is to investigate an airway management technique that would allow for the benefits of the ETT in terms of a secure airway for the duration of the surgical procedure as well the potential for less emergence phenomena seen when emerging with an LMA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
August 14, 2025
August 1, 2025
6.4 years
March 4, 2016
August 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in rate pressure product during emergence
Difference in heart rate multiplied by systolic blood pressure measured during the \~5 minutes prior to emergence and the \~5 minutes after removal of the airway device. Heart rate is continuously monitored and recorded at one minute intervals. Blood pressure is intermittently monitored at 3 minute intervals. The two SBPs measured prior to removal of the airway device will be multiplied by the HR at those times and the RPPs will be averaged. This will be compared with average of the product of the two SBPs and their corresponding HRs measured after removal of the airway device.
Intraoperative
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Time to successful ventilation via ETT
Intraoperative
Change in rate pressure product during induction of anesthesia and intubation
Intraoperative
Success rate of ventilation with LMA after extubation of trachea
Intraoperative
Presence/ severity of cough during prior to removal of airway device
Intraoperative
Presence/ severity of cough during after removal of airway device
Intraoperative
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ETT only
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndotracheal tube intubation after induction of anesthesia. Ventilation with ETT until emergence.
Combined ETT/LMA technique
EXPERIMENTALPlacement of LMA after induction of anesthesia. Intubation of trachea with ETT via LMA with fiberoptic bronchoscope. Ventilation with ETT throughout case. Removal of ETT while deeply anesthetized. Ventilation with LMA until emergence.
Interventions
At the discretion of the primary anesthesiologist. Typically involves the administration of an analgesic agent, hypnotic agent, and neuromuscular blocking agent
By standard method. Sizing at the discretion of the primary anesthesiologist.
Via direct or indirect laryngoscopy. Sizing at the discretion of the primary anesthesiologist. Mallinckrodt (TM) Intermediate Hi-Lo cuffed endotracheal tube (Covidien)
Ventilator mode, tidal volume/ ventilation pressure, respiratory rate, positive end expiratory pressure, inspired to expired ratio at the discretion of the primary anesthesiologist.
Either upon emergence of anesthesia after suctioning of the oropharynx and after a positive pressure breath or while deeply anesthetized after release of the pneumoperitoneum in the combined LMA/ETT group.
With ETT using fiberoptic bronchoscope guidance.
After removal of the ETT. Ventilator mode, tidal volume/ ventilation pressure, respiratory rate, positive end expiratory pressure, inspired to expired ratio at the discretion of the primary anesthesiologist.
At the discretion of primary team. Airway device (either ETT or LMA) will be removed when patient is adequately ventilating and able to respond to commands (such as "open your eyes" or "squeeze my hand").
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA 1-3
- Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals who cannot provide consent
- Individuals who would require translation services to provide consent
- Prisoners
- Parturients
- Non-fasted patients (as per HMC Anesthesiology Department NPO policy)
- Patients felt to be high risk for gastric reflux and pulmonary aspiration (those with gastroparesis, symptomatic GERD, etc.: at the discretion of primary anesthesia team) Those patients with anticipated difficult airway requiring maintenance of spontaneous ventilation (awake intubation)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Centerlead
- Ambu A/Scollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Penn State Health - Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Related Publications (17)
Difficult Airway Society Extubation Guidelines Group; Popat M, Mitchell V, Dravid R, Patel A, Swampillai C, Higgs A. Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia. 2012 Mar;67(3):318-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07075.x.
PMID: 22321104RESULTAtkinson RS, Rushman GB, Alfred Lee J: A Synopsis of Anaesthesia, 10th edition. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, 1987, pp 165-9
RESULTKoga K, Asai T, Vaughan RS, Latto IP. Respiratory complications associated with tracheal extubation. Timing of tracheal extubation and use of the laryngeal mask during emergence from anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1998 Jun;53(6):540-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00397.x.
PMID: 9709138RESULTPerello-Cerda L, Fabregas N, Lopez AM, Rios J, Tercero J, Carrero E, Hurtado P, Hervias A, Gracia I, Caral L, de Riva N, Valero R. ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Attenuates Systemic and Cerebral Hemodynamic Response During Awakening of Neurosurgical Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015 Jul;27(3):194-202. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000108.
PMID: 25121397RESULTMinogue SC, Ralph J, Lampa MJ. Laryngotracheal topicalization with lidocaine before intubation decreases the incidence of coughing on emergence from general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004 Oct;99(4):1253-1257. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000132779.27085.52.
PMID: 15385385RESULTNho JS, Lee SY, Kang JM, Kim MC, Choi YK, Shin OY, Kim DS, Kwon MI. Effects of maintaining a remifentanil infusion on the recovery profiles during emergence from anaesthesia and tracheal extubation. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Dec;103(6):817-21. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep307. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
PMID: 19864308RESULTGuler G, Akin A, Tosun Z, Eskitascoglu E, Mizrak A, Boyaci A. Single-dose dexmedetomidine attenuates airway and circulatory reflexes during extubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Sep;49(8):1088-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00780.x.
PMID: 16095449RESULTNatalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, Dell'Agnolo P, Bernardini A. Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2003 Sep;15(6):428-32. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(03)00085-0.
PMID: 14652119RESULTBeleña JM, Núñez M, Gracia JL, Pérez JL, Yuste J. The Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™: safety and efficacy during gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia 18: 143-7, 2012.
RESULTCarron M, Veronese S, Gomiero W, Foletto M, Nitti D, Ori C, Freo U. Hemodynamic and hormonal stress responses to endotracheal tube and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway for laparoscopic gastric banding. Anesthesiology. 2012 Aug;117(2):309-20. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013ef31825b6a80.
PMID: 22614132RESULTBernardini A, Natalini G. Risk of pulmonary aspiration with laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube: analysis on 65 712 procedures with positive pressure ventilation. Anaesthesia. 2009 Dec;64(12):1289-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06140.x. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
PMID: 19860753RESULTNair I, Bailey PM. Use of the laryngeal mask for airway maintenance following tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia. 1995 Feb;50(2):174-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb15104.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 7710032RESULTTimmermann A. Supraglottic airways in difficult airway management: successes, failures, use and misuse. Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66 Suppl 2:45-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06934.x.
PMID: 22074079RESULTTakahoko K, Iwasaki H, Sasakawa T, Suzuki A, Matsumoto H, Iwasaki H. Unilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy after use of the laryngeal mask airway supreme. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2014;2014:369563. doi: 10.1155/2014/369563. Epub 2014 Aug 31.
PMID: 25254120RESULTLehnert B, Prescher A, Neuschaefer-Rube C. Is laryngeal mask airway-related vocal chord palsy always laryngeal mask airway-related? Br J Anaesth. 2008 Dec;101(6):882. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen304. No abstract available.
PMID: 19004921RESULTEl Toukhy M, Tweedie O. Bilateral lingual nerve injury associated with classic laryngeal mask airway: a case report. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Aug;29(8):400-1. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283514e81. No abstract available.
PMID: 22472625RESULTShah AC, Barnes C, Spiekerman CF, Bollag LA. Hypoglossal nerve palsy after airway management for general anesthesia: an analysis of 69 patients. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):105-120. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000495.
PMID: 25625257RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arne Budde, MD
Penn State M.S. Hershey Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2016
First Posted
March 15, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
August 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will be stored in REDCap, a HIPPA compliant secured and encrypted electronic database.