PIB Versus CI Through a Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheter for Analgesia Following Major Ankle Surgery
Comparing the Delivery of Local Anesthetic by Programmed Intermittent Bolus Versus Continuous Infusion Through a Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheter for Analgesia Following Major Ankle Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a clinical study to investigate and compare a new programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) delivery method for continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for pain relief in patients undergoing major ankle surgery compared with the current practice of continuous local anesthetic infusion (CI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Oct 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedOctober 31, 2016
October 1, 2016
3.2 years
November 20, 2015
October 27, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Average numerical rating score (NRS) for pain
post-operative 48 hours
Secondary Outcomes (4)
NRS for pain at rest and with movement at specified time points
post-operative 48 hours
Number of local anesthetic PCA boluses administered
post-operative 48 hours
Total dose of local anesthetic
post-operative 48 hours
Patient satisfaction, on a 0-10 NRS
post-operative 48 hours
Study Arms (2)
CI 0.2% ropivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in Group Continuous Infusion (CI) will receive continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5 mL/hour; total 4-hourly consumption = 20 mL = 40 mg ropivacaine. • All patients will be able to self-administer PCA boluses of 5 mL of ropivacaine 0.2% at intervals of 30 minutes as required. 2\) Oral patient controlled analgesia (PCA) using oxycodone or hydromorphone. Patients under 70 years of age will receive either 10 mg of oxycodone or 2 mg of hydromorphone 2 hourly as needed, and patients 70 years of age or older will receive 5 mg of oxycodone or 1 mg of hydromorphone 2 hourly as needed. 3\) Oral acetaminophen 1,000 mg 6 hourly.
PIB 0.2% ropivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in Group programmed intermittent boluses (PIB) will receive automated programmed intermittent boluses of 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 hours; total 4-hourly consumption = 20 mL = 40 mg ropivacaine. • All patients will be able to self-administer PCA boluses of 5 mL of ropivacaine 0.2% at intervals of 30 minutes as required. 2\) Oral patient controlled analgesia (PCA) using oxycodone or hydromorphone. Patients under 70 years of age will receive either 10 mg of oxycodone or 2 mg of hydromorphone 2 hourly as needed, and patients 70 years of age or older will receive 5 mg of oxycodone or 1 mg of hydromorphone 2 hourly as needed. 3\) Oral acetaminophen 1,000 mg 6 hourly.
Interventions
Patients in Group CI will receive continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5 mL/hour; total 4-hourly consumption = 20 mL = 40 mg ropivacaine. All patients will be able to self-administer PCA boluses of 5 mL of ropivacaine 0.2% at intervals of 30 minutes as required
Patients in Group Programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) will receive automated programmed intermittent boluses of 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.2% every 2 hours; total 4-hourly consumption = 20 mL = 40 mg ropivacaine. All patients will be able to self-administer PCA boluses of 5 mL of ropivacaine 0.2% at intervals of 30 minutes as required
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Inpatients having major foot and ankle surgery that will benefit from continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block with an indwelling catheter
- American Society Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- years of age, inclusive
- kg, inclusive
- cm of height or greater
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who undergo iliac crest bone graft harvesting as part of their surgery
- Preexisting neurological deficits or peripheral neuropathy in the distribution of the sciatic nerve
- Local infection
- Contraindication to regional anesthesia e.g. bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy
- Chronic pain disorders
- History of use of over 30mg oxycodone or equivalent per day
- Allergy to local anesthetics
- History of significant psychiatric conditions that may affect patient assessment
- Pregnancy
- Inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
Related Publications (4)
George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013 Jan;116(1):133-44. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182713b26. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
PMID: 23223119BACKGROUNDTaboada M, Rodriguez J, Bermudez M, Amor M, Ulloa B, Aneiros F, Sebate S, Cortes J, Alvarez J, Atanassoff PG. Comparison of continuous infusion versus automated bolus for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with popliteal sciatic nerve catheters. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jan;110(1):150-4. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318191693a.
PMID: 19104182BACKGROUNDChludzinski A, Irani C, Mascha EJ, Kurz A, Devereaux PJ, Sessler DI. Protocol understanding and anxiety in perioperative clinical trial patients approached for consent on the day of surgery. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 May;88(5):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.12.014.
PMID: 23639498BACKGROUNDShort AJ, Ghosh M, Jin R, Chan VWS, Chin KJ. Intermittent bolus versus continuous infusion popliteal sciatic nerve block following major foot and ankle surgery: a prospective randomized comparison. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Sep 29:rapm-2018-100301. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100301. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 31570495DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ki Jinn Chin, MD
University Health Network, Toronto
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2015
First Posted
March 14, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 31, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
by publication