Post-operative RadioTherapy for Patients With Metastases of the Long Bones
PORT
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: Bone metastases arise in 50% of all patients dying of cancer, increasing up to 70% in patients with breast and prostate cancer. The lesions can cause pain and fractures, leading to diminished quality of life and poorer survival. Current knowledge concerning adequate, personalized treatment of metastatic lesions of the long bones in patients with disseminated cancer is insufficient and inconclusive due to lack of large, prospective series with patient reported outcome measures. One of the debatable issues is the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy. It has become common practise due to professional opinion, but research evidence is lacking. It is thought that adjuvant radiotherapy improves the durability of an implant, prevents progression of the lesion, promotes bone healing, improves limb function, minimises pain and reduces the need for reoperations, however none of these are certain. Moreover, it is a burden on patient's quality of life (e.g. multiple extra hospital visits) causing toxicity and possible side effects (e.g. skin irritation). The true beneficial effect, weighing up the possible pros and certain cons, of adjuvant radiotherapy is thus unknown. Objective: The PORT study aims to demonstrate the non-inferiority of 'surgery only' compared to surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy as treatment of impending and actual pathological fractures on the pain experienced by patients. Study design: A multicentre, prospective, randomised non-inferiority trial nested within the OPTIMAL study. Study population: All patients with metastases of the long bones undergoing surgery for a(n) (impending) pathologic fracture in the participating centres. Study intervention: One study arm (A) will receive surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy; the other study arm (B) will receive surgery only. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint is patient reported pain according to a numeric rating scale (NRS). Clinical functioning, radiological status, complications and survival are secondary endpoints.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2019
CompletedSeptember 19, 2016
September 1, 2016
3 years
February 25, 2016
September 16, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The number of patients with a difference of 2 points or more on a 11-point numeric rating scale for pain
Pain will measured before treatment and after treatment on an 11-point numeric rating scale for pain. If the score differs more than 2 points between those measuring moments the change in pain is reported as significant. The number of patients in each group with a significant change in pain score will be measured.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Complications
3 months, 6 months, 1 year
Study Arms (2)
A: Surgery & Post-operative radiotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurgery \& Post-operative radiotherapy
B: Surgery only
NO INTERVENTIONSurgery only
Interventions
Multifractionated post-operative radiotherapy, several weeks after surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 or older
- Bone metastasis deriving from the following bones:
- humerus, ulna, radius
- femur, tibia, fibula
- Radiographic or histologic proof of metastatic bone disease
- Histologic diagnosis of the primary tumour or - if the diagnosis is unknown - at least adequate diagnostic investigations into the origin of the metastasis (e.g. dissemination imaging, histology, biopsy)
- Receive surgical treatment with palliative intent for a pathologic fracture or impending pathologic fracture
You may not qualify if:
- Primary bone tumours (benign and/or malignant)
- No informed consent signed
- Communication with patient is hampered (e.g. language barrier, severe cognitive impairment, dementia)
- Lesions in the small bones of the extremities
- (Surgical) treatment with curative intent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, 2333ZA, Netherlands
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sander Dijkstra, MD PhD
Leiden University Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yvette van der Linden, MD PhD
Leiden University Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2016
First Posted
March 10, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2019
Study Completion
January 1, 2019
Last Updated
September 19, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share