Clinical Trial Comparing Carnoy's and GEWF Solutions
1 other identifier
interventional
181
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Regional lymph node metastasis is a major determinant of local recurrence and overall survival rates in patients with colorectal cancer. Because of the poor prognosis associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis, stage III colorectal cancer patients should receive adjuvant treatment with chemo and / or radiation therapy according to the site of tumor. Several authors have investigated the use of revealing solutions for lymph node clearance in colorectal cancer. Most studies comparing conventional histopathological specimen examination to any lymph node clearing technique showed that the use of revealing solutions increases the mean number of lymph nodes harvested, usually in a statistically significant manner. It is still controversial the impact of the use of revealing solutions for upstaging of lymph node status and consequently for the indication for adjuvant therapy. Therefore will be conducted a randomized clinical trial to compares the performance of GEWF and Carnoy solutions for the histopathological examination of patients with colorectal cancer. The aim of this study is to determine the lymph node revealing solution with the best performance (increase in the mean number of lymph node harvested and lymph node upstaging) in patients with colorectal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 20, 2019
March 1, 2019
3.3 years
February 22, 2016
March 18, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Increased lymph node sample
Additional number (unit measure) of lymph nodes identified by the lymph node clearing technique (visual and manual examination with Carnoy's or GEWF solutions) compared to the initial number (unit measure) of lymph nodes identified by the conventional technique (visual and manual examination with formaldehyde).
1 week
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Additional lymph node metastases
1 week
Change of lymph node staging
1 week
Indication for adjuvant treatment
1 month
Study Arms (4)
Colon Cancer - Carnoy
ACTIVE COMPARATOR(1) just after the surgical resection each specimen is fixed by formaldehyde; (2) lymph node harvesting is performed by a manual technique of vision and palpation; (3) lymph nodes retrieved are counted, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined with light microscopy; (4) the surgical specimen is submitted to re-fixation with Carnoy solution and another lymph node harvesting by manual technique of vision and palpation; (5) additional lymph nodes retrieved are counted, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined with light microscopy.
Colon Cancer - GEWF
ACTIVE COMPARATOR(1) just after the surgical resection each specimen is fixed by formaldehyde; (2) lymph node harvesting is performed by a manual technique of vision and palpation; (3) lymph nodes retrieved are counted, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined with light microscopy; (4) the surgical specimen is submitted to re-fixation with GEWF solution and another lymph node harvesting by manual technique of vision and palpation; (5) additional lymph nodes retrieved are counted, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined with light microscopy.
Rectal Cancer - Carnoy
ACTIVE COMPARATOR(1) just after the surgical resection each specimen is fixed by formaldehyde; (2) lymph node harvesting is performed by a manual technique of vision and palpation; (3) lymph nodes retrieved are counted, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined with light microscopy; (4) the surgical specimen is submitted to re-fixation with Carnoy solution and another lymph node harvesting by manual technique of vision and palpation; (5) additional lymph nodes retrieved are counted, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined with light microscopy.
Rectal Cancer - GEWF
ACTIVE COMPARATOR(1) just after the surgical resection each specimen is fixed by formaldehyde; (2) lymph node harvesting is performed by a manual technique of vision and palpation; (3) lymph nodes retrieved are counted, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined with light microscopy; (4) the surgical specimen is submitted to re-fixation with GEWF solution and another lymph node harvesting by manual technique of vision and palpation; (5) additional lymph nodes retrieved are counted, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined with light microscopy.
Interventions
The subjects in this group will undergo intervention by having surgery (colorectal cancer resection) and lymph node clearing technique with Carnoy solution
The subjects in this group will undergo intervention by having surgery (colorectal cancer resection) and lymph node clearing technique with GEWF solution
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically proven colorectal adenocarcinoma
- Voluntary agreement of the patient to participate in research
- Voluntary agreement of the surgeon to participate in research
You may not qualify if:
- Absence of accurate histopathological data
- Unplanned extended resection
- Synchronous colorectal cancer
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Extended lymphadenectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035001, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Antonio N Kalil, MD, PhD
Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2016
First Posted
March 10, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
January 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 20, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share