Prospective, Randomized Comparison of the Use of FloShield Air System ® Versus the Referenced Technic (Water + Povidone-Iodine Solution) During Gynecologic Endoscopic Surgery to Evaluate the Operative Lens Vision Quality
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic surgical procedures are becoming more common in all surgical specialties including gynecology that was one of the pioneers in this field specialties. Maintaining a quality field of view is important not only to patient safety but also for the quality of surgery and reduced surgery time. The lenses of vision which are located at the distal end of the optical vision are during endoscopic surgery in direct contact with the anatomical structures. These lenses are found soiled by several phenomena whose appearance of a mist which constitutes a major obstacle to a clear field. The alteration of the vision requires the surgeon extraction optics in order to achieve a cleaning of the lens. This cleaning is carried out as many times as necessary. Many strategies have been developed to improve the quality of vision. These methods relate to both the development of new optical vision but also the development of the lens cleaning material. In practice, the cleaning is carried out using a sterile swab sterile saline associated with the betadine iodine. Recently a new material called "FloShield Air System Vision System" has been proposed and has the particularity to combine both anti-fog product and a temperature control system in contact with the lens in order to fight against condensation and smoke. The purpose of this is to improve the quality of vision by reducing the fogging phenomenon and no change of the temperature in contact with the lens (moisture reduction). Accordingly, it is assumed a reduction in the number of stay and a reduction in the specific operative time associated with this cleaning. In this context, we wish to evaluate the effectiveness of FloShield Air System vision system on the basis of a comparative, prospective, randomized against the reference method (sterile water solution + Betadine) during endoscopic surgery gynecology.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Mar 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 20, 2016
October 1, 2016
6 months
March 3, 2016
October 18, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
number of Laparoscope removals during surgery
0.5hr - 6hr
Secondary Outcomes (2)
medico economic cost effectiveness of the system
0.5hr - 6hr
Evaluation of the quality of vision by the surgeon and his assistant end of the procedure using a visual analog scale
0.5hr - 6hr
Study Arms (2)
FloShield
EXPERIMENTALFloShield Air Laparoscopic Cleaning and Defogging System used during laparoscopic surgery
Water + Povidone-iodine Solution
EXPERIMENTALClearify Visualization with Water + Povidone-iodine Solutionused during laparoscopic surgery
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female or Male; 18 years of age or older; Patient scheduled for gynecologic paroscopic surgery under the care of the study investigator; Suitable candidate for surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Unfit for surgery: concomitant disorders incompatible with the study or surgery (at the discretion of the investigator); Use of Surgiquest AirSeal®; Use of humidified insufflation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aphp, Tenon Hospital
Paris, Paris /france, 75020, France
Related Publications (1)
Bendifallah S, Salakos E, Naoura I, Aristizabal P, Furet E, Zilberman S, Ballester M, Darai E. Prospective, randomized comparison of the use of FloShield Air System(R) versus the reference technique (water + povidone-iodine solution) during gynecologic endoscopic surgery to evaluate the operative lens vision quality. Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1593-1599. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5642-6. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
PMID: 28643058DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2016
First Posted
March 8, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10