Proximal Versus Distal Adductor Canal Blocks for Total Knee Arthroplasty
A Comparison of Proximal Versus Distal Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks After Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate pain control of continuous adductor canal blocks placed proximally versus distally within the canal. The investigators hypothesize that there will be similar pain control between both groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Feb 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedJuly 13, 2017
July 1, 2017
9 months
February 29, 2016
July 11, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Opioid Consumption (IV Morphine Equivalents)
Total opioid consumption
24 Hours
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Opioid Consumption (IV Morphine Equivalents)
48 Hours
Pain (Numeric Rating)
48 Hours
Quadriceps Strength (% of Baseline)
48 Hours
Distance Ambulated (Feet)
48 Hours
Study Arms (2)
Proximal
ACTIVE COMPARATORProximal Adductor Canal Block
Distal
ACTIVE COMPARATORDistal Adductor Canal Block
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
- ASA physical status I-III
- \>18 years old
- Non-pregnant
- Consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate
- \<18 years old
- Chronic opioid use
- Localized infection Pregnancy Pre-existing coagulopathy Allergy to ultrasound gel or local anesthetics Contraindication to or refusal of spinal anesthetic
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101, United States
Related Publications (1)
Meier AW, Auyong DB, Yuan SC, Lin SE, Flaherty JM, Hanson NA. Comparison of Continuous Proximal Versus Distal Adductor Canal Blocks for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jan;43(1):36-42. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000692.
PMID: 29140959DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Neil A Hanson, MD
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 29, 2016
First Posted
March 8, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07