Capsaicin + Diclofenac Gel in Acute Back Pain or Neck Pain
A Randomized, Controlled Multi-centre Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Doses of a Topically Applied Combination Containing Diclofenac 2% + Capsaicin 0.075% (2 g Formulation Per Application; 2-times Daily for 5 Days) Compared to Placebo, as Well as to Diclofenac 2% and Capsaicin 0.075% in Patients With Acute Back or Neck Pain
2 other identifiers
interventional
746
2 countries
18
Brief Summary
This randomised, controlled multi-centre parallel group trial will assess the efficacy and tolerability of a topical formulation gel of the combination of diclofenac and capsaicin in comparison to gels with diclofenac alone, capsaicin alone, and placebo for the treatment of acute back pain or neck pain
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started May 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 9, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 13, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 21, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 6, 2019
CompletedMay 6, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.2 years
March 2, 2016
July 18, 2018
February 5, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in POM Between Baseline and Day 2 Evening, 1 Hour After Drug Application
Pain on movement (POM) was used to assess pain measurement for back and neck pain. The standardized movements have been established for which the measurement was taken. POMwp was the POM measure that gave the highest score at baseline; i.e. POM of worst procedure. Pain intensity was assessed at rest after standing in an upright position relatively motionless for 1 minute. The pain was evaluated by asking patient 'How would you rate your pain right now?' and by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 centimeters (cm) wherein 0 cm = no pain to 10 cm = worst pain possible. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for POMwp in cm.
Baseline and Day 2
Secondary Outcomes (7)
POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 72 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-72 h))
0 to 72 hours after start of treatment
POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 120 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-120 h))
0 to 120 hours after start of treatment
Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 30% From Baseline
Baseline and day 2
Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 50% From Baseline
Baseline and day 2
Change From Baseline in POMwp (cm) at Day 6 Morning
Baseline and Day 6
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Diclofenac and capsaicin
EXPERIMENTALFixed dose combination
Diclofenac
ACTIVE COMPARATORCapsaicin
ACTIVE COMPARATORPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed and dated written informed consent at Visit 1 in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and local legislation
- Male or female patients \>=18 years with current diagnosis of acute back pain or of neck pain for at least 24 hours, but less than 21 days
- Acute back pain or acute neck pain resulting in pain on movement (POM) \>= 50 mm (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100) for at least one POM procedure out of 5 standardized procedures.
- Sensitivity to algometric pressure on the painful trigger point \<= 25 N/cm2
- Women of childbearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control
You may not qualify if:
- History of 3 or more episodes of back or neck pain in the last 6 months excluding the current episode
- Surgery due to back or neck pain or rehabilitation due to back or neck pain in the last 12 months
- Back or neck pain that is attributable to any specific identifiable cause (e.g. disc prolapse, spondylolisthesis, osteomalacia, inflammatory arthritis, metabolic, neurological diseases or tumour)
- Trauma or strains of the back or neck muscles within the last 3 months
- Prior use within the last 3 days before Visit 1 or concomitant use of any anti-inflammatory drugs, heparinoids, muscle relaxants or analgesics. Long-acting glucocorticoids must have been discontinued 10 days before study entry. Spinal injections should have been discontinued in due time (investigator's judgement) before patient enrolment to allow complete wash-out of the active ingredient based on investigator's judgment
- Non-pharmacological treatment (physiotherapy, heat treatment (e.g. heat patch, hot water bottle), or massage, acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) or locally applied pharmacological product to the back or neck area 24 hours prior study entry and during the study period
- Known severe hepatocellular insufficiency, severe renal insufficiency or Gilbert's syndrome (Morbus Meulengracht)
- Any other medical condition that would interfere with efficacy and safety assessments based on investigator's judgement or any on-going clinical condition that would jeopardize patient's or site personnel's safety or study compliance based on investigator judgement.
- Known intolerance or hypersensitivity to the active ingredients or any excipient(s).
- Patients in whom attacks of asthma, bronchospasm, rhinitis or urticaria were precipitated by the intake of Acetyl salicylic acid (ASS) or other NSAIDs
- Irritated skin (based on investigator's judgement), skin wounds, eczema or open injuries at application site
- Negative experience in the past with heat treatments for muscle complaints
- Patient not able to understand and comply with trial requirements based on investigators judgement
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Participation in a clinical trial within the previous 30 days or simultaneous participation in another clinical trial
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (18)
emovis GMBH, Berlin
Berlin, 10629, Germany
Synexus Clinical Research GmbH
Berlin, 12627, Germany
Synexus Clinical Research GmbH
Bochum, 44787, Germany
Sport- und Präventionsmedizinische Praxis, 50933 Köln
Cologne, 50933, Germany
Dünnwaldpraxis, Köln
Cologne, 51069, Germany
Praxis Dr. Steinebach, Essen
Essen, 45277, Germany
Praxis Dr. Schaefer, 45355 Essen
Essen, 45355, Germany
Unterfrintroper Hausarztzentrum
Essen, 45359, Germany
Synexus Clinical Research GmbH
Frankfurt, 60313, Germany
Praxis Dr. Pabst, Gilching
Gilching, 82205, Germany
Praxis Dr. Dahmen, 22415 Hamburg
Hamburg, 22415, Germany
Praxis Dr. Klein, Künzing
Künzing, 94550, Germany
Synexus Clinical Research GmbH
Leipzig, 04103, Germany
Anästhesiologie Rheinbach
Rheinbach, 53359, Germany
University Clinic of Headache, Private Practice, Moscow
Moscow, 129090, Russia
State Budget.Hlthcare Inst.City Outpatient dept #123,Therapy
Saint Petersburg, 192289, Russia
Medical Centre "Reavita", Therapy Dept., St. Petersburg
Saint Petersburg, 194325, Russia
St.Petersburg State Budget.Hlthcare Inst.City Outpat.dep#107
Saint Petersburg, 195030, Russia
Related Publications (1)
Predel HG, Ebel-Bitoun C, Peil B, Weiser TW, Lange R. Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac + Capsaicin Gel in Patients with Acute Back/Neck Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study. Pain Ther. 2020 Jun;9(1):279-296. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00161-9. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
PMID: 32221866DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
A possible limitation of this study design related to the warming effect that is attributable to the topical application of capsaicin, which could potentially have led to inadvertent unblinding of treatment assignments in the study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Center
- Organization
- Boehringer Ingelheim
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Boehringer Ingelheim
Boehringer Ingelheim
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2016
First Posted
March 7, 2016
Study Start
May 9, 2016
Primary Completion
July 13, 2017
Study Completion
July 21, 2017
Last Updated
May 6, 2019
Results First Posted
May 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02