High On-treatment Platelet Reactivity Identified by Multiple Platelet Function Assay
HOPEmultiPFA
1 other identifier
interventional
477
1 country
1
Brief Summary
High on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate was a important reason to cause ischemic events in antiplatelet therapy. Using single testing to definite HPR may miss the "true HPR" or over estimate HPR, which may lead to randomized trials failed. It is not known whether combined multiple platelet function testing could assist to ensure"ture"HPR and improve clinical outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2016
CompletedMarch 4, 2016
February 1, 2016
1.6 years
October 30, 2015
February 29, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Major adverse cardiovascular events
stent thrombosis;ACS;all cause Death;stroke;
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Bleeding events
1 year
Study Arms (3)
HPR-Ticagrelor row
ACTIVE COMPARATORACS patients aftergoing PCI treated with clopidogrel and aspirin were included. in the 3-5th day after prescription of clopidogrel, platelet function were tested simultaneously by three methods: Light transmittance aggregometry(LTA), Thrombelastography (TEG) ,Innovance PFA-200 . According to three method results(Two of three or all three results higher than cutoff value was identified as HPR, MPALTA\>50%;MAADP\>47mm;CTP2Y\<106s).Patients was defined as HPR and unHPR, HPR patients were randomized divided into HPR-Ticagrelor(HPR-T) and HPR-Clopidogrel(HPR-C)
HPR-Clopidogrel row
ACTIVE COMPARATORThrombelastography (TEG) ,Innovance PFA-200 . According to three method results(Two of three or all three results higher than cutoff value was identified as HPR, MPALTA\>50%;MAADP\>47mm;CTP2Y\<106s).Patients was defined as HPR and unHPR, HPR patients were randomized divided into HPR-Ticagrelor(HPR-T) and HPR-Clopidogrel(HPR-C)
unHPR row
ACTIVE COMPARATORThrombelastography (TEG) ,Innovance PFA-200 . According to three method results(Two of three or all three results higher than cutoff value was identified as HPR, MPALTA\>50%;MAADP\>47mm;CTP2Y\<106s).Patients was defined as HPR and unHPR, HPR patients were randomized divided into HPR-Ticagrelor(HPR-T) and HPR-Clopidogrel(HPR-C)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ACS patients(UAP;USTEMI,STEMI)
- Undergoing PCI
- Oral antiplatelet therapy
You may not qualify if:
- Stable CAD
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital
Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Zhou xin, MD
Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2015
First Posted
March 4, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 4, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02