Recovery of Muscle Function After Deep Neuromuscular Block by Means of Diaphragm Ultrasonography
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Diaphragm ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool in order to demonstrate the superiority of Sugammadex vs. AChEI in facilitating post-operative neuromuscular recovery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Nov 2014
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 25, 2016
October 1, 2016
2.3 years
February 15, 2016
October 24, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with post-operative residual curarization (PORC) as assessed by diaphragm ultrasonography in order to determine its muscle strenght
The clinician will assess TF (defined as a percentage) and amplitude of excursion (expressed in millimetres) of the diaphragm by means of ultrasonography
30 minutes from the end of surgical procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of participants with post-operative complications related to PORC such as pneumonia as assessed chest x ray, drop of SpO2 by means of pulse oximeter and blood gas sample.
up to 1 week
Number of participants with post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) as assessed by postoperative nause and vomiting visual analogic scale (PONV VAS)
up to 48 hours
Study Arms (2)
Sugammadex
EXPERIMENTALpatients enrolled who will receive sugammadex 2 mg\*kg-1 at the end of surgery
Nestigmine, Atropine
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients enrolled who will receive neostigmine 50 mcg\*kg-1 and atropine 15 mcg\*kg-1 at the end of surgery
Interventions
Prior to induction of anesthesia each enrolled patients, ultrasonography diaphragm evaluation will be performed using an ESAOTE ultrasound machine (ESAOTE MyLab, Genova, Italy) by assessing the TF and amplitude of excursion.
Neuromuscular monitoring assesses muscle recovery after deep neuromuscular block through trainf of four and post tetanic count method
Rocuronium will be administered 0.6 mg\*kg-1 to reach neuromuscular block at the induction of general anesthesia and 0.15 mg\*kg-1 when PTC elicits more than 5 twitches in order to maintain a deep neuromuscular block
Fentanest will be administered 2 mcg\*kg-1 at the induction of general anesthesia and titrated 0.5 mcg\*kg-1 every 30 minutes
Propofol will be administered 2 mg\*kg-1 at the induction of general anesthesia
Sevoflurane will be administered at 1.0 MAC in an air/oxygen mixture
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA physical status I-II
- age between 18-80 years old
- dNMB with rocuronium during ear nose and throat (ENT) surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of hepatic or renal disease
- Clinical diagnosis of chronic or acute alcoholism
- History of allergy or hypersensitivity to Sugammadex and/or atropine or Neostigmine
- Current medications with CNS effects
- History of neurologic disease
- Diaphragmatic palsy
- Pregnancy or nursing
- History of malignant arrhythmias
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Florencelead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Azienda Ospdaliero Universitaria Careggi
Florence, 50134, Italy
Related Publications (7)
Viby-Mogensen J. Postoperative residual curarization and evidence-based anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Mar;84(3):301-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013428. No abstract available.
PMID: 10793585RESULTNaguib M, Kopman AF, Ensor JE. Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;98(3):302-16. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael386.
PMID: 17307778RESULTFlockton EA, Mastronardi P, Hunter JM, Gomar C, Mirakhur RK, Aguilera L, Giunta FG, Meistelman C, Prins ME. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):622-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen037. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
PMID: 18385265RESULTWait JL, Nahormek PA, Yost WT, Rochester DP. Diaphragmatic thickness-lung volume relationship in vivo. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989 Oct;67(4):1560-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.67.4.1560.
PMID: 2676955RESULTVivier E, Mekontso Dessap A, Dimassi S, Vargas F, Lyazidi A, Thille AW, Brochard L. Diaphragm ultrasonography to estimate the work of breathing during non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2012 May;38(5):796-803. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2547-7. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
PMID: 22476448RESULTCappellini I, Ostento D, Loriga B, Tofani L, De Gaudio AR, Adembri C. Comparison of neostigmine vs. sugammadex for recovery of muscle function after neuromuscular block by means of diaphragm ultrasonography in microlaryngeal surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Jan;37(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001055.
PMID: 31356374DERIVEDCappellini I, Picciafuochi F, Ostento D, Danti G, De Gaudio AR, Adembri C. Recovery of muscle function after deep neuromuscular block by means of diaphragm ultrasonography and adductor of pollicis acceleromyography with comparison of neostigmine vs. sugammadex as reversal drugs: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Feb 21;19(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2525-7.
PMID: 29467022DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chiara Adembri, MD
University of Florence
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2016
First Posted
March 4, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 25, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10