Evaluation of Thermocool SF Catheter on the Common Cavo-tricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter Ablation
Comparative Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Catheters CelsiusTMDS® 8 mm, Thermocool® 3.5 mm of Irrigated Tip and Thermocool® SF in the Treatment of Cavo-tricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Thermocool SF ® system is at least as effective and safe as regular 8mm catheters and irrigated tip catheters in the treatment of cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 3, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 3, 2016
February 1, 2016
3.9 years
February 29, 2016
March 2, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to get cavo-tricuspid isthmus block
during the ablation.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Time of fluoroscopy.
during the ablation.
Radio frequency application time.
during the ablation.
Complications.
within the first 24 hours.
Recurrence of atrial flutter.
one year.
Study Arms (3)
CelsiusTMDS® 8 mm catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATOR50 patients underwent ablation with CelsiusTMDS® 8 mm catheter.
Thermocool® 3.5 mm irrigated catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATOR50 patients underwent ablation with Thermocool® 3.5 mm catheter of irrigated tip.
Thermocool® SF catheter
EXPERIMENTAL50 patients underwent ablation with Thermocool® SF catheter.
Interventions
After demonstrating cavo-tricuspidal isthmic dependant atrial flutter with a duodecapolar catheter, ablation with continuous tissue lesion will be performed with CelsiusTMDS® 8 mm catheter, until complete isthmic block is achieved.
After demonstrating cavo-tricuspidal isthmic dependant atrial flutter with a duodecapolar catheter, ablation with continuous tissue lesion will be performed with Thermocool® 3.5 mm catheter of irrigated tip, until complete isthmic block is achieved.
After demonstrating cavo-tricuspidal isthmic dependant atrial flutter with a duodecapolar catheter, ablation with continuous tissue lesion will be performed with Thermocool® SF catheter, until complete isthmic block is achieved.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with symptomatic common atrial flutter.
- Electrocardiographic documentation of common atrial flutter.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to give consent.
- Life expectancy less than 6 months.
- Contraindication for ablation.
- Previous cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturiaslead
- Johnson & Johnsoncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33011, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Tsai CF, Tai CT, Yu WC, Chen YJ, Hsieh MH, Chiang CE, Ding YA, Chang MS, Chen SA. Is 8-mm more effective than 4-mm tip electrode catheter for ablation of typical atrial flutter? Circulation. 1999 Aug 17;100(7):768-71. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.7.768.
PMID: 10449701BACKGROUNDJais P, Shah DC, Haissaguerre M, Hocini M, Garrigue S, Le Metayer P, Clementy J. Prospective randomized comparison of irrigated-tip versus conventional-tip catheters for ablation of common flutter. Circulation. 2000 Feb 22;101(7):772-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.7.772.
PMID: 10683351BACKGROUNDSchreieck J, Zrenner B, Kumpmann J, Ndrepepa G, Schneider MA, Deisenhofer I, Schmitt C. Prospective randomized comparison of closed cooled-tip versus 8-mm-tip catheters for radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Oct;13(10):980-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00980.x.
PMID: 12435182BACKGROUNDScavee C, Georger F, Jamart J, Mancini I, Collet B, Blommaert D, De Roy L. Is a cooled tip catheter the solution for the ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1P2):328-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00043.x.
PMID: 12687839BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
José Manuel Rubín López, PhD
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 29, 2016
First Posted
March 3, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 3, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02