The Effect of Subsartorial Saphenous Block on Postoperative Pain Following Major Ankle and Hind Foot Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study investigates the effect of a ultrasound-guided subsartorial saphenous block on postoperative pain following major ankle and hind foot surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jun 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 3, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2017
CompletedMarch 27, 2017
September 1, 2016
8 months
February 22, 2016
March 24, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Frequency of patients who experience significant pain at rest (change from no significant pain to significant pain)
Pain scores evaluated using NRS (numeric rating scale). Significant pain is defined as NRS \> 3 from the anterior and/medial side of the ankle joint. In case of significant pain, patients receive a rescue saphenous block with 10 ml bupivacaine-adrenaline.
Arrival at the Perioperative Section (within 30 minutes after surgery) and at t = 30 min, t = 45 min, t = 60 min, t = 75 min, t = 90 min, t = 105 min, t = 120. The beginning of the observation period (t0) is the registered time for the end of surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Sensory testing, infrapatellar branch (nociception is tested using a standardized Neuropen)
At the time point when the patients report a change to significant pain during the observation period. In case of no significant pain during the observation period, sensory testing is conducted at t = 120 min.
Sensory testing, sciatic nerve (nociception is tested using a standardized Neuropen)
Sensory test is conducted at arrival at the Perioperative Section (within 30 minutes after surgery)
Study Arms (2)
Bupivacaine-epinephrine
EXPERIMENTAL10 mL of 5 mg/mL bupivacaine with 5 μg/mL epinephrine = 50 mg bupivacaine and 50 μg epinephrine
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOR10 ml normal saline water (sodium chloride solution, 0,9%)
Interventions
50 mg bupivacaine and 50 μg adrenalin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective ankle or hind foot surgery either: (1) total ankle arthroplasty, (2) ankle arthrodesis (3) subtalar arthrodesis or (4) triple arthrodesis
- Age ≥ 18
- American Society of Anaesthesiology Classification I-III
- Informed consent both orally and in writing after the patient has fully understood the protocol and its limitations.
You may not qualify if:
- Communication problems or dementia
- Allergies to any medical product used in the study
- Neuropathy of the sciatic or femoral nerve prior to the operation
- Morbus Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease
- Daily use of opioids
- Coagulation disorders
- Infection at the site of injection or systemic infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
Related Publications (9)
Clendenen SR, Whalen JL. Saphenous nerve innervation of the medial ankle. Local Reg Anesth. 2013 Mar 6;6:13-6. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S42603. Print 2013.
PMID: 23630434BACKGROUNDBlumenthal S, Borgeat A, Neudorfer C, Bertolini R, Espinosa N, Aguirre J. Additional femoral catheter in combination with popliteal catheter for analgesia after major ankle surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;106(3):387-93. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq365. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
PMID: 21169609BACKGROUNDWhite PF, Issioui T, Skrivanek GD, Early JS, Wakefield C. The use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block after surgery involving the foot and ankle: does it improve the quality of recovery? Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1303-1309. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000082242.84015.D4.
PMID: 14570643BACKGROUNDChen J, Lesser J, Hadzic A, Resta-Flarer F. The importance of the proximal saphenous nerve block for foot and ankle surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):372. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295596a. No abstract available.
PMID: 23788076BACKGROUNDKalthur SG, Sumalatha S, Nair N, Pandey AK, Sequeria S, Shobha L. Anatomic study of infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve in male cadavers. Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Mar;184(1):201-6. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1087-2. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
PMID: 24535194BACKGROUNDKerver AL, Leliveld MS, den Hartog D, Verhofstad MH, Kleinrensink GJ. The surgical anatomy of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve in relation to incisions for anteromedial knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 4;95(23):2119-25. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01297.
PMID: 24306699BACKGROUNDFisker AK, Iversen BN, Christensen S, Linde F, Nielsen KK, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. Combined saphenous and sciatic catheters for analgesia after major ankle surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Aug;62(8):875-82. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0379-y. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
PMID: 25851020BACKGROUNDBendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Borglum J. Basic Topography of the Saphenous Nerve in the Femoral Triangle and the Adductor Canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):391-2. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000261. No abstract available.
PMID: 26079358BACKGROUNDBjorn S, Wong WY, Baas J, Nielsen KK, Borglum J, Hauritz RW, Bendtsen TF. The Importance of the Saphenous Nerve Block for Analgesia Following Major Ankle Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jul;43(5):474-479. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000764.
PMID: 29667940DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen, MD, phD
Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2016
First Posted
March 3, 2016
Study Start
June 21, 2016
Primary Completion
February 28, 2017
Study Completion
February 28, 2017
Last Updated
March 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-09