NCT02697461

Brief Summary

Lateral ankle sprains (LAS) and chronic ankle instability (CAI) are common musculoskeletal injuries that are a result of inversion injury during sport. The midfoot is frequently involved during inversion injury, is often overlooked during clinical examination, and maybe contributory to the development of CAI. The purpose of this study is to investigate multisegmented foot motion using a motion capture system, clinical joint physiological and accessory motion, and morphologic foot measurements in recreationally active men and women with and without a history of lateral ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. Additionally, the effects of a joint mobilization intervention in patients with diminished multisegmented foot motion and intrinsic foot strengthening in healthy individuals will be investigated.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
115

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2016

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 11, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 3, 2016

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 9, 2017

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

January 11, 2016

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Changes in midfoot frontal plane range of motion during stance phase of gait.

    Segmental motion will be assessed using motion capture and measured in degrees.

    Arm 1: Baseline, 1wk, 5 wks. Arm 2: Baseline, 1wk, 2wks

  • Changes in ultrasound thickness measures of the abductor hallucis

    Muscle thickness measures will be measured in cm.

    Arm 1: Baseline, 4 wks.

  • Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)

    Patient Report Outcome of Foot and Ankle Function

    Arm 1: Baseline, 5 wks. Arm 2: Baseline, 1wk, 2wks

  • Changes in ultrasound thickness measures of the flexor digitorum brevis

    Muscle thickness measures will be measured in cm.

    Arm 1: Baseline, 4 wks.

  • Changes in thickness measures of the flexor hallucis brevis

    Muscle thickness measures will be measured in cm.

    Arm 1: Baseline, 4 wks.

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Changes in Foot morphological measurements across loading conditions

    Arm 1: Baseline, 1wk, 5 wks. Arm 2: Baseline, 1wk, 2wks

  • Changes in Clinical Measures of forefoot frontal plane range of motion

    Arm 1: Baseline, 1wk, 5 wks. Arm 2: Baseline, 1wk, 2wks

  • Changes in Clinical Measures of range of motion of first ray flexion/extension

    Arm 1: Baseline, 1wk, 5 wks. Arm 2: Baseline, 1wk, 2wks

  • Changes in Clinical Measures of joint laxity of the forefoot

    Arm 1: Baseline, 1wk, 5 wks. Arm 2: Baseline, 1wk, 2wks

  • Changes in Clinical Measures of joint laxity of the first ray

    Arm 1: Baseline, 1wk, 5 wks. Arm 2: Baseline, 1wk, 2wks

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intrinsic Foot Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

In arm 1, a randomized control trial will be used in the investigation of validity and reliability comparing multisegmented foot motion, clinical joint physiological and accessory motion, and morphologic foot measurements, and the effect of intrinsic foot strengthening on multisegmented foot function.

Other: Intrinsic Foot Strengthening

Joint Mobilization Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

In arm 2, the investigation of group differences in clinical and laboratory measures of multisegmented foot motion and kinetics will use a case control design. A randomized controlled trial will be conducted in the study investigating joint mobilization, with the researcher performing the assessments and the provider performing the treatments blinded to group allocation

Other: Joint Mobilization

Interventions

Intrinsic foot strengthening is a commonly used intervention in clinic used to increase foot stability both in prevention of and in treatment of foot and ankle injury. Subjects allocated to the strengthening program will be educated in commonly used short foot exercises and "toe yoga" maneuvers that target the intrinsic muscles of the foot. No equipment will be required to perform the exercises.

Intrinsic Foot Arm

Joint mobilization is a commonly used clinical intervention used to decrease pain and increase joint range of motion. In the treatment groups who present with joint hypomobility, a forefoot inversion maneuver with a dorsally applied pressure in the lateral midfoot and rearfoot stabilized will be applied at the barrier before the physiologic end range of motion. A second mobilization will be performed at the distal segment of the 1st Tarsometatarsal joint. These mobilizations will be performed by a board certified orthopaedic physical therapist with 14-yrs of practice experience. No equipment will be required to perform the joint mobilization.

Joint Mobilization Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy participants
  • Aged 18-50
  • All subjects will be physically active: Participating in some form of physical activity for at least 20 min per day, three times per week.
  • All subjects will have no history of ankle injury.
  • LAS participants
  • Aged 18-50
  • All subjects with a history of ankle sprains, no lingering symptoms or disability, not actively receiving treatment for their ankle sprain
  • All subjects will be physically active: Participating in some form of physical activity for at least 20 min per day, three times per week.
  • CAI participants
  • Aged 18-50
  • CAI with a history of recurrent ankle sprains, with the first sprain occurring longer than 12 months ago. They will have lingering symptoms, and disability, but not actively receiving treatment for their CAI
  • All subjects will be physically active: Participating in some form of physical activity for at least 20 min per day, three times per week.

You may not qualify if:

  • Neurological or vestibular disorders affecting balance
  • Currently seeking medical care for LAS/CAI
  • History of prior ankle surgery
  • History of ankle or foot fracture
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Current self-reported disability due to lower extremity pathology that may adversely affect neuromuscular function
  • Lumbosacral radiculopathy
  • Soft tissue disorders including Marfan's syndrome and Ehlers-Dandros syndrome
  • Absolute contraindications to manual therapy
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Exercise and Sports Injury Laboratory, University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States

Location

Related Publications (24)

  • Waterman BR, Owens BD, Davey S, Zacchilli MA, Belmont PJ Jr. The epidemiology of ankle sprains in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Oct 6;92(13):2279-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01537.

    PMID: 20926721BACKGROUND
  • Feger MA, Herb CC, Fraser JJ, Glaviano N, Hertel J. Supervised rehabilitation versus home exercise in the treatment of acute ankle sprains: a systematic review. Clin Sports Med. 2015 Apr;34(2):329-46. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Feb 14.

    PMID: 25818717BACKGROUND
  • Delahunt E, Coughlan GF, Caulfield B, Nightingale EJ, Lin CW, Hiller CE. Inclusion criteria when investigating insufficiencies in chronic ankle instability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Nov;42(11):2106-21. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181de7a8a.

    PMID: 20351590BACKGROUND
  • Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Oct;19(10):653-60. doi: 10.1177/107110079801901002.

    PMID: 9801078BACKGROUND
  • Braun BL. Effects of ankle sprain in a general clinic population 6 to 18 months after medical evaluation. Arch Fam Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;8(2):143-8. doi: 10.1001/archfami.8.2.143.

    PMID: 10101985BACKGROUND
  • Konradsen L, Bech L, Ehrenbjerg M, Nickelsen T. Seven years follow-up after ankle inversion trauma. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2002 Jun;12(3):129-35. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2002.02104.x.

    PMID: 12135444BACKGROUND
  • Tanen L, Docherty CL, Van Der Pol B, Simon J, Schrader J. Prevalence of chronic ankle instability in high school and division I athletes. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014 Feb;7(1):37-44. doi: 10.1177/1938640013509670. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

    PMID: 24287210BACKGROUND
  • Mok KM, Fong DT, Krosshaug T, Engebretsen L, Hung AS, Yung PS, Chan KM. Kinematics analysis of ankle inversion ligamentous sprain injuries in sports: 2 cases during the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1548-52. doi: 10.1177/0363546511399384. Epub 2011 Apr 1. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21460069BACKGROUND
  • Kristianslund E, Bahr R, Krosshaug T. Kinematics and kinetics of an accidental lateral ankle sprain. J Biomech. 2011 Sep 23;44(14):2576-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Aug 6.

    PMID: 21824618BACKGROUND
  • Willems T, Witvrouw E, Delbaere K, De Cock A, De Clercq D. Relationship between gait biomechanics and inversion sprains: a prospective study of risk factors. Gait Posture. 2005 Jun;21(4):379-87. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.04.002.

    PMID: 15886127BACKGROUND
  • Fong DT, Ha SC, Mok KM, Chan CW, Chan KM. Kinematics analysis of ankle inversion ligamentous sprain injuries in sports: five cases from televised tennis competitions. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;40(11):2627-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546512458259. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

    PMID: 22967824BACKGROUND
  • Fong DT, Chan YY, Mok KM, Yung PS, Chan KM. Understanding acute ankle ligamentous sprain injury in sports. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2009 Jul 30;1:14. doi: 10.1186/1758-2555-1-14.

    PMID: 19640309BACKGROUND
  • Wei F, Fong DT, Chan KM, Haut RC. Estimation of ligament strains and joint moments in the ankle during a supination sprain injury. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015;18(3):243-8. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2013.792809. Epub 2013 May 8.

    PMID: 23654290BACKGROUND
  • Bonnel F, Toullec E, Mabit C, Tourne Y; Sofcot. Chronic ankle instability: biomechanics and pathomechanics of ligaments injury and associated lesions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Jun;96(4):424-32. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 May 20.

    PMID: 20493797BACKGROUND
  • Blakeslee TJ, Morris JL. Cuboid syndrome and the significance of midtarsal joint stability. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1987 Dec;77(12):638-42. doi: 10.7547/87507315-77-12-638. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3430355BACKGROUND
  • Fagel VL, Ocon E, Cantarella JC, Feldman F. Case report 183: dislocation of the cuboid bone without fracture. Skeletal Radiol. 1982 Jan;7(4):287-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00361989. No abstract available.

    PMID: 7071629BACKGROUND
  • Littlejohn SG, Line LL, Yerger LB Jr. Complete cuboid dislocation. Orthopedics. 1996 Feb;19(2):175-6. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19960201-15. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8834294BACKGROUND
  • Kollmannsberger A, De Boer P. Isolated calcaneo-cuboid dislocation: brief report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Mar;71(2):323. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B2.2925758. No abstract available.

    PMID: 2925758BACKGROUND
  • McDonough MW, Ganley JV. Dislocation of the cuboid. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1973 Jul;63(7):317-8. doi: 10.7547/87507315-63-7-317. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4146011BACKGROUND
  • Jacobsen FS. Dislocation of the cuboid. Orthopedics. 1990 Dec;13(12):1387-9. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19901201-12. No abstract available.

    PMID: 2274483BACKGROUND
  • Gough DT, Broderick DF, Januzik SJ, Cusack TJ. Dislocation of the cuboid bone without fracture. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Oct;17(10):1095-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80453-0.

    PMID: 3178001BACKGROUND
  • Drummond DS, Hastings DE. Total dislocation of the cuboid bone. Report of a case. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1969 Nov;51(4):716-8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4984469BACKGROUND
  • Sondergaard L, Konradsen L, Holmer P, Jorgensen LN, Nielsen PT. Acute midtarsal sprains: frequency and course of recovery. Foot Ankle Int. 1996 Apr;17(4):195-9. doi: 10.1177/107110079601700402.

    PMID: 8696494BACKGROUND
  • Martin RL, Davenport TE, Paulseth S, Wukich DK, Godges JJ; Orthopaedic Section American Physical Therapy Association. Ankle stability and movement coordination impairments: ankle ligament sprains. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Sep;43(9):A1-40. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.0305. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24313720BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ankle Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Jay Hertel, PhD, ATC

    University of Virginia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prinicipal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2016

First Posted

March 3, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 9, 2017

Study Completion

June 1, 2017

Last Updated

May 3, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Locations