NCT02697279

Brief Summary

In the Emergency Department (ED), patients frequently seek medical treatment for cutaneous abscesses. Traditional incision and drainage (I\&D), with or without packing of cutaneous abscesses has long been the accepted standard of care. This procedure is often very painful for the patient. Additionally, compliance with wound care and follow-up can present barriers to proper care and healing. Research has suggested that incision and loop drainage of an abscess may be another effective treatment for simple cutaneous abscess. Thus far, research into this procedure has been limited to the pediatric population with small sample sizes. In these previous studies, this technique was found to be an effective and less painful treatment for abscesses. Research has not been done in the adult population using this procedure. If this procedure is found to be as effective and less painful in the adult population, then it should be considered as a potential preferred I\&D method for cutaneous abscess in the ED.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 4, 2016

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 3, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 5, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

February 4, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

AbscessLoopDrainage

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Procedure failure rate

    Determining the difference in failure rates between the study group and control group. Treatment failure is a composite outcome defined as having the presence of any of the following: requiring a 2nd incision and drainage procedure, a patient that requires administration of antibiotics after the initial treatment period due to worsening clinical status, a patient that requires hospitalization after the initial treatment period due to worsening clinical status.

    5 -7 days after procedure

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Difference in pain associated with the procedure using a visual analog pain scale

    Measured after the procedure on day 1

  • Patient Satisfaction using a visual analog pain scale

    5-7 days after procedure

Study Arms (2)

Traditional Incision and Drainage

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment of a simple cutaneous abscess with traditional incision and drainage with or without packing, decision made at the discretion of the provider.

Procedure: Traditional Incision and Drainage.

Loop drainage

EXPERIMENTAL

Treatment of a simple cutaneous abscess with incision and drainage using the loop drainage technique.

Procedure: Loop drainage

Interventions

Control Group- Standard treatment of a simple cutaneous abscess with traditional I\&D technique with or without packing utilizing a standard I\&D kit.

Traditional Incision and Drainage
Loop drainagePROCEDURE

Study Group- Treatment of a simple cutaneous abscess with the loop drainage technique utilizing an standard I\&D kit and the cuff of a sterile glove for a loop device.

Loop drainage

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years or older
  • Presents to ED with simple cutaneous abscess
  • Provides informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Abscess too small for performance of procedure
  • Signs of systemic infection
  • Need for hospitalization
  • Previously treated for current abscess
  • Clinician determines abscess would not be amenable to drainage by loop technique
  • Patients known to be pregnant
  • Incarcerated patients
  • Students / Employees of the facility

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Maryland Medical Systems

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Ladd AP, Levy MS, Quilty J. Minimally invasive technique in treatment of complex, subcutaneous abscesses in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jul;45(7):1562-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.03.025.

    PMID: 20638546BACKGROUND
  • Kushnir VA, Mosquera C. Novel technique for management of Bartholin gland cysts and abscesses. J Emerg Med. 2009 May;36(4):388-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.05.019. Epub 2008 Nov 26.

    PMID: 19038518BACKGROUND
  • Ladde JG, Baker S, Rodgers CN, Papa L. The LOOP technique: a novel incision and drainage technique in the treatment of skin abscesses in a pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;33(2):271-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

    PMID: 25435407BACKGROUND
  • Thompson DO. Loop drainage of cutaneous abscesses using a modified sterile glove: a promising technique. J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;47(2):188-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.04.035. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

    PMID: 24928539BACKGROUND
  • McNamara WF, Hartin CW Jr, Escobar MA, Yamout SZ, Lau ST, Lee YH. An alternative to open incision and drainage for community-acquired soft tissue abscesses in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Mar;46(3):502-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.08.019.

    PMID: 21376200BACKGROUND
  • Tsoraides SS, Pearl RH, Stanfill AB, Wallace LJ, Vegunta RK. Incision and loop drainage: a minimally invasive technique for subcutaneous abscess management in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Mar;45(3):606-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.06.013.

    PMID: 20223328BACKGROUND
  • Taira BR, Singer AJ, Thode HC Jr, Lee CC. National epidemiology of cutaneous abscesses: 1996 to 2005. Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Mar;27(3):289-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.027.

    PMID: 19328372BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Abscess

Interventions

Drainage

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SuppurationInfectionsInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TherapeuticsSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • R. Gentry Wilkerson, MD

    U of Maryland, Baltimore

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2016

First Posted

March 3, 2016

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion

February 1, 2018

Study Completion

February 1, 2018

Last Updated

January 5, 2022

Record last verified: 2021-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations