Study Stopped
Unable to enroll the appropriate number of subjects within a reasonable timeframe.
Loop Drainage: Effectiveness in Treating Cutaneous Abscesses
Evaluation of Loop Drainage Technique Versus Standard Incision and Drainage for Treatment of Simple Soft Tissue Abscesses
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the Emergency Department (ED), patients frequently seek medical treatment for cutaneous abscesses. Traditional incision and drainage (I\&D), with or without packing of cutaneous abscesses has long been the accepted standard of care. This procedure is often very painful for the patient. Additionally, compliance with wound care and follow-up can present barriers to proper care and healing. Research has suggested that incision and loop drainage of an abscess may be another effective treatment for simple cutaneous abscess. Thus far, research into this procedure has been limited to the pediatric population with small sample sizes. In these previous studies, this technique was found to be an effective and less painful treatment for abscesses. Research has not been done in the adult population using this procedure. If this procedure is found to be as effective and less painful in the adult population, then it should be considered as a potential preferred I\&D method for cutaneous abscess in the ED.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 3, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedJanuary 5, 2022
December 1, 2021
1.3 years
February 4, 2016
December 15, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Procedure failure rate
Determining the difference in failure rates between the study group and control group. Treatment failure is a composite outcome defined as having the presence of any of the following: requiring a 2nd incision and drainage procedure, a patient that requires administration of antibiotics after the initial treatment period due to worsening clinical status, a patient that requires hospitalization after the initial treatment period due to worsening clinical status.
5 -7 days after procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Difference in pain associated with the procedure using a visual analog pain scale
Measured after the procedure on day 1
Patient Satisfaction using a visual analog pain scale
5-7 days after procedure
Study Arms (2)
Traditional Incision and Drainage
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatment of a simple cutaneous abscess with traditional incision and drainage with or without packing, decision made at the discretion of the provider.
Loop drainage
EXPERIMENTALTreatment of a simple cutaneous abscess with incision and drainage using the loop drainage technique.
Interventions
Control Group- Standard treatment of a simple cutaneous abscess with traditional I\&D technique with or without packing utilizing a standard I\&D kit.
Study Group- Treatment of a simple cutaneous abscess with the loop drainage technique utilizing an standard I\&D kit and the cuff of a sterile glove for a loop device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- Presents to ED with simple cutaneous abscess
- Provides informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Under 18 years of age
- Abscess too small for performance of procedure
- Signs of systemic infection
- Need for hospitalization
- Previously treated for current abscess
- Clinician determines abscess would not be amenable to drainage by loop technique
- Patients known to be pregnant
- Incarcerated patients
- Students / Employees of the facility
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Maryland Medical Systems
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Related Publications (7)
Ladd AP, Levy MS, Quilty J. Minimally invasive technique in treatment of complex, subcutaneous abscesses in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jul;45(7):1562-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.03.025.
PMID: 20638546BACKGROUNDKushnir VA, Mosquera C. Novel technique for management of Bartholin gland cysts and abscesses. J Emerg Med. 2009 May;36(4):388-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.05.019. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
PMID: 19038518BACKGROUNDLadde JG, Baker S, Rodgers CN, Papa L. The LOOP technique: a novel incision and drainage technique in the treatment of skin abscesses in a pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;33(2):271-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
PMID: 25435407BACKGROUNDThompson DO. Loop drainage of cutaneous abscesses using a modified sterile glove: a promising technique. J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;47(2):188-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.04.035. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
PMID: 24928539BACKGROUNDMcNamara WF, Hartin CW Jr, Escobar MA, Yamout SZ, Lau ST, Lee YH. An alternative to open incision and drainage for community-acquired soft tissue abscesses in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Mar;46(3):502-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.08.019.
PMID: 21376200BACKGROUNDTsoraides SS, Pearl RH, Stanfill AB, Wallace LJ, Vegunta RK. Incision and loop drainage: a minimally invasive technique for subcutaneous abscess management in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Mar;45(3):606-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.06.013.
PMID: 20223328BACKGROUNDTaira BR, Singer AJ, Thode HC Jr, Lee CC. National epidemiology of cutaneous abscesses: 1996 to 2005. Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Mar;27(3):289-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.027.
PMID: 19328372BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
R. Gentry Wilkerson, MD
U of Maryland, Baltimore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2016
First Posted
March 3, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
January 5, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share