G5® Mobile Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Automated vs. Manual Sensor Applicator
Comparison of G5® Mobile Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy When Using an Automated Applicator vs. a Manual Sensor Applicator
1 other identifier
observational
97
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Comparison of G5® Mobile Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy When Using an Automated Applicator vs. a Manual Sensor Applicator
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2016
Shorter than P25 for all trials
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedApril 14, 2016
April 1, 2016
3 months
January 25, 2016
April 13, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
proportion of blood glucose values, compared between CGM and a lab glucose analyzer that are matched relative to a diabetes accuracy measurement of %20/20 mg/dL
7 days
Study Arms (1)
CGM Users
Eligibility Criteria
Adults and pediatrics with diabetes mellitus
You may qualify if:
- Ages 2 or older
- Diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes or Type 2 diabetes
- Willing to participate in a clinic session involving venous sampling for evaluation of study end point
You may not qualify if:
- Use of acetaminophen
- Known allergy to medical-grade adhesives
- Pregnancy
- Hematocrit outside specification of the study-assigned blood glucose meter
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- DexCom, Inc.lead
Study Sites (4)
AMCR Institute
Escondido, California, 92025, United States
Rocky Mountain Diabetes and Osteoporosis Center
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404, United States
Joslin Diabetes Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Clinical Trials of Texas
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2016
First Posted
March 2, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 14, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04