ERP Based Single-dose Predictions of Stimulants
Pediatric Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Predicting Clinical Response to Stimulant Medication From Single-dose Changes in Event Related Potentials
1 other identifier
interventional
87
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to see if the clinical outcome of stimulant medication (methylphenidate) in pediatric Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder can be predicted on the bases of changes in Event Related Potentials (ERPs) induced by a single dose of stimulant medication. (ERPs are extracted from electroencephalographic (EEG) registrations during the performance of an attention task).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Oct 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 1, 2016
February 1, 2016
6.3 years
February 15, 2016
February 29, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Classification as responders (REs) or non-responders (non-REs) based on daily ratings from parents and teachers of ADHD symptoms during a four weeks medication trial
Classification as RE or non-RE within a time frame of five to ten weeks after onset of medication trial.
Study Arms (1)
ADHD medication effects
EXPERIMENTALSingle dose methylphenidate (Ritalin tablets); 10 mg for ages 8-13; 15 mg for ages 13-17
Interventions
Test 1: No medication. Registration of ERPs and behavioral data during an attention task. Test 2: Test repeated on a single dose of MPH. Outcome measure: Classification as responders or non-responders after a four weeks medication trial, based on rating scales from parents and Teachers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients referred to the clinic diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Cases With comorbid diagnoses such as emotional or behavioral disorders, learning disabilities or high functioning autism are included.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients With intelligence coefficients below 70 or a diagnosed neurological disease are excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Team, Østfold Hospital Trust
Fredrikstad, 1605, Norway
Related Publications (13)
Ogrim G, Hestad KA, Brunner JF, Kropotov J. Predicting acute side effects of stimulant medication in pediatric attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: data from quantitative electroencephalography, event-related potentials, and a continuous-performance test. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1301-9. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S49611. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
PMID: 24043939RESULTOgrim G, Kropotov J, Brunner JF, Candrian G, Sandvik L, Hestad KA. Predicting the clinical outcome of stimulant medication in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: data from quantitative electroencephalography, event-related potentials, and a go/no-go test. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Feb 3;10:231-42. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S56600. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24523588RESULTHermens DF, Cooper NJ, Kohn M, Clarke S, Gordon E. Predicting stimulant medication response in ADHD: evidence from an integrated profile of neuropsychological, psychophysiological and clinical factors. J Integr Neurosci. 2005 Mar;4(1):107-21. doi: 10.1142/s0219635205000653.
PMID: 16041867RESULTJohnston BA, Coghill D, Matthews K, Steele JD. Predicting methylphenidate response in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a preliminary study. J Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jan;29(1):24-30. doi: 10.1177/0269881114548438. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
PMID: 25237119RESULTBarkley RA. Predicting the response of hyperkinetic children to stimulant drugs: a review. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976;4(4):327-48. doi: 10.1007/BF00922531.
PMID: 794087RESULTChabot RJ, Orgill AA, Crawford G, Harris MJ, Serfontein G. Behavioral and electrophysiologic predictors of treatment response to stimulants in children with attention disorders. J Child Neurol. 1999 Jun;14(6):343-51. doi: 10.1177/088307389901400601.
PMID: 10385840RESULTRiccio CA, Waldrop JJ, Reynolds CR, Lowe P. Effects of stimulants on the continuous performance test (CPT): implications for CPT use and interpretation. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001 Summer;13(3):326-35. doi: 10.1176/jnp.13.3.326.
PMID: 11514638RESULTSangal RB, Sangal JM. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: use of cognitive evoked potential (P300) to predict treatment response. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;117(9):1996-2006. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
PMID: 16890481RESULTYoung ES, Perros P, Price GW, Sadler T. Acute challenge ERP as a prognostic of stimulant therapy outcome in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 1995 Jan 1;37(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)00075-E.
PMID: 7893855RESULTCzerniak SM, Sikoglu EM, King JA, Kennedy DN, Mick E, Frazier J, Moore CM. Areas of the brain modulated by single-dose methylphenidate treatment in youth with ADHD during task-based fMRI: a systematic review. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2013 May-Jun;21(3):151-62. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0b013e318293749e.
PMID: 23660970RESULTLinssen AM, Vuurman EF, Sambeth A, Nave S, Spooren W, Vargas G, Santarelli L, Riedel WJ. Contingent negative variation as a dopaminergic biomarker: evidence from dose-related effects of methylphenidate. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Dec;218(3):533-42. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2345-x. Epub 2011 May 20.
PMID: 21597989RESULTOgrim G, Kropotov JD. Predicting Clinical Gains and Side Effects of Stimulant Medication in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder by Combining Measures From qEEG and ERPs in a Cued GO/NOGO Task. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2019 Jan;50(1):34-43. doi: 10.1177/1550059418782328. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
PMID: 29940782DERIVEDAasen IE, Ogrim G, Kropotov J, Brunner JF. Methylphenidate selectively modulates one sub-component of the no-go P3 in pediatric ADHD medication responders. Biol Psychol. 2018 Apr;134:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
PMID: 29476840DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Geir Ogrim, PhD
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2016
First Posted
March 1, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share