Persistent Postoperative Pain Incidence With Gabapentin Used
PPP
1 other identifier
interventional
122
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study's objective will be to evaluate the gabapentine efficiency in orally and long term used after painfully surgeries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 29, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedFebruary 6, 2023
February 1, 2023
1 month
February 19, 2016
February 2, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Prevalence of pain after using gabapentin.
It will be used a 10cm ruler which will allows the patients indicates how much pain they are feeling at the moment, where 0 is no pain at all and 10 is the maximum imaginable pain.
Two years
Study Arms (2)
Gabapentin
EXPERIMENTAL300mg of Gabapentin per day (two doses), orally during 30 days
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOR300mg of Placebo per day (two doses), orally during 30 days
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients that require persistent painfully surgeries such as breast surgeries (mastectomies and breast implants), herniorrhaphies (not laparoscopical) unilateral or bilateral, amputations of upper and lower limbs and chest surgeries (thoracotomy, thoracoscopy , sternotomies).
- Patients that had already signed the informed consent.
- Patients aged between 21 and 75.
- ASA I - II \_ III (Classification system that the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) uses to estimate the anesthesiology risk that patients may suffer)
- BMI, not more than 35 Kg/m2.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women
- Patients that suffer liver and renal failure (plasma creatinine over 1.5 mg/ml or creatinine clearance less than 60 ml/min),heart failure or neurological dysfunction.
- Diabetic patients
- Gabapentine allergic patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sofía Konekny
Almagro, Buenos Aires, C1199ABB, Argentina
Related Publications (15)
Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.
PMID: 16698416BACKGROUNDMacrae WA. Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):77-86. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen099. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
PMID: 18434337BACKGROUNDWerner MU, Kongsgaard UE. I. Defining persistent post-surgical pain: is an update required? Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):1-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu012. Epub 2014 Feb 18. No abstract available.
PMID: 24554546BACKGROUNDBorsook D, Kussman BD, George E, Becerra LR, Burke DW. Surgically induced neuropathic pain: understanding the perioperative process. Ann Surg. 2013 Mar;257(3):403-12. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182701a7b.
PMID: 23059501BACKGROUNDCrombie IK, Davies HT, Macrae WA. Cut and thrust: antecedent surgery and trauma among patients attending a chronic pain clinic. Pain. 1998 May;76(1-2):167-71.
PMID: 9696470BACKGROUNDGartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1568.
PMID: 19903919BACKGROUNDGilron I, Watson CP, Cahill CM, Moulin DE. Neuropathic pain: a practical guide for the clinician. CMAJ. 2006 Aug 1;175(3):265-75. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060146.
PMID: 16880448BACKGROUNDMatthews EA, Dickenson AH. Effects of spinally delivered N- and P-type voltage-dependent calcium channel antagonists on dorsal horn neuronal responses in a rat model of neuropathy. Pain. 2001 May;92(1-2):235-46. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00255-x.
PMID: 11323145BACKGROUNDSchmader KE. Epidemiology and impact on quality of life of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Clin J Pain. 2002 Nov-Dec;18(6):350-4. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200211000-00002.
PMID: 12441828BACKGROUNDBouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-Schluep H, Lanteri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005 Mar;114(1-2):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
PMID: 15733628BACKGROUNDBackonja MM, Galer BS. Pain assessment and evaluation of patients who have neuropathic pain. Neurol Clin. 1998 Nov;16(4):775-90. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8619(05)70097-9.
PMID: 9767062BACKGROUNDLavand'homme P. From preemptive to preventive analgesia: time to reconsider the role of perioperative peripheral nerve blocks? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):4-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820305b8. No abstract available.
PMID: 21455081BACKGROUNDRosner H, Rubin L, Kestenbaum A. Gabapentin adjunctive therapy in neuropathic pain states. Clin J Pain. 1996 Mar;12(1):56-8. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199603000-00010.
PMID: 8722736BACKGROUNDDauri M, Faria S, Gatti A, Celidonio L, Carpenedo R, Sabato AF. Gabapentin and pregabalin for the acute post-operative pain management. A systematic-narrative review of the recent clinical evidences. Curr Drug Targets. 2009 Aug;10(8):716-33. doi: 10.2174/138945009788982513.
PMID: 19702520BACKGROUNDMiller A, Price G. Gabapentin toxicity in renal failure: the importance of dose adjustment. Pain Med. 2009 Jan;10(1):190-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00492.x. Epub 2008 Aug 18.
PMID: 18721173BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Francisco FB Bonofiglio, Doctor
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Cuando el paciente dé su consentimiento, será reclutado y randomizado a un grupo control (recibirá placebo) o a un grupo tratamiento (recibirá gabapentin) Los pacientes recibirán una técnica anestésica habitual, basadas en drogas endovenosas mediante el método TCI (target controlled infusión). Con este método se unifica el uso de las drogas anestésicas, que son utilizadas de acuerdo a sexo, edad, género, peso y altura en cada uno de los pacientes. La analgesia será la convencional para cada cirugía y se continuará con el uso de catéteres epidurales, para analgesia en aquellas intervenciones donde su aplicación sea habitual.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiology Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2016
First Posted
February 29, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
February 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share