Study Stopped
Difficulty in recruiting participants
The American Glaucoma Society (AGS) Second Aqueous Shunt Implant vs. Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation Treatment Study (ASSISTS)
ASSISTS
The AGS Second Aqueous Shunt Implant vs. Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation Treatment Study
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
23
Brief Summary
Outcomes of subjects with uncontrolled glaucoma with a single existing aqueous tube shunt implant undergoing a second aqueous shunt to transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 14, 2021
CompletedNovember 2, 2021
October 1, 2021
4.7 years
February 15, 2016
September 16, 2021
October 26, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of Eyes That Failed Treatment
Treatment failure is defined as meeting one or more of the following 4 criteria: 1. Intraocular pressure (IOP) a) \>18 mm Hg on maximum tolerated topical IOP-lowering medications, or b) Reduction of \< 20% IOP on maximum tolerated topical IOP-lowering medications from medicated preoperative IOP, or c) ≤ 5 mm Hg without IOP-lowering medications on IOP confirmation visit, 6 months after initial study intervention; or 2. Reoperation for glaucoma; or 3. Addition of an oral CAI for the study eye on or after the 6-Month Study Visit; or 4. Loss of light perception vision (NLP).
from time of intervention to month 6
Number of Eyes That Failed Treatment
Treatment failure is defined as meeting one or more of the following 4 criteria: 1. Intraocular pressure (IOP) a) \>18 mm Hg on maximum tolerated topical IOP-lowering medications, or b) Reduction of \< 20% IOP on maximum tolerated topical IOP-lowering medications from medicated preoperative IOP, or c) ≤ 5 mm Hg without IOP-lowering medications on IOP confirmation visit, 6 months after initial study intervention; or 2. Reoperation for glaucoma; or 3. Addition of an oral CAI for the study eye on or after the 6-Month Study Visit; or 4. Loss of light perception vision (NLP).
from month 6 to month 12
Number of Eyes That Failed Treatment
Treatment failure is defined as meeting one or more of the following 4 criteria: 1. Intraocular pressure (IOP) a) \>18 mm Hg on maximum tolerated topical IOP-lowering medications, or b) Reduction of \< 20% IOP on maximum tolerated topical IOP-lowering medications from medicated preoperative IOP, or c) ≤ 5 mm Hg without IOP-lowering medications on IOP confirmation visit, 6 months after initial study intervention; or 2. Reoperation for glaucoma; or 3. Addition of an oral CAI for the study eye on or after the 6-Month Study Visit; or 4. Loss of light perception vision (NLP).
from month 12 to year 3
Secondary Outcomes (39)
Number of Eyes With Vision-threatening Complications
from the time of intervention to year 3
Number of Eyes That Lost Two or More Lines of Vision as Assessed by the Snellen Chart Visual Acuity Test
from time of intervention to year 3
Change in Visual Acuity as Assessed by the Snellen Chart Visual Acuity Test
baseline, week 1
Change in Visual Acuity as Assessed by the Snellen Chart Visual Acuity Test
baseline, month 1
Change in Visual Acuity as Assessed by the Snellen Chart Visual Acuity Test
baseline, month 3
- +34 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Second Aqueous Shunt
ACTIVE COMPARATORSecond Aqueous Shunt Either a Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant 350-mm2 BG101-350 or an Ahmed Model FP7 Flexible Plate must be used for all participants unless there is insufficient space, in which case a Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant 250-mm2 BG103-250 may be used.
Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransscleral Diode Laser Cyclophotocoagulation
Interventions
Recommended setting are 2000 milliwatt (mW) for 2 seconds, 1850 mW for 3 seconds or 1750 mW for 4 second duration, titrating the energy up or down just below where a pop is heard.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women and men 18 to 85 years of age
- Glaucoma not adequately controlled (IOP \>18 mmHg on maximum tolerated topical therapy) with a single aqueous shunt (AS).
- Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of hand motion (HM) or better in the study eye
You may not qualify if:
- Monocular
- Presence of more than one AS in the study eye
- Previous cyclodestruction in the study eye
- Presence of active iris neovascularization in the study eye
- Binocular diplopia
- Presence of scleral buckle in the study eye
- History or scleritis in either eye
- History of scleromalacia in the study eye
- Insufficient conjunctiva to cover AS in the study eye
- IOP cannot be accurately measured with Goldmann applanation, Pneumotonometry, or Tono-Pen in the study eye
- Presence of silicone oil in the study eye
- Presence of retinal detachment in the study eye
- Presence of intraocular or orbital tumor affecting the study eye
- Need for cataract extraction or concurrent procedure at the time of study treatment, except tectonic aqueous shunt revisions for both groups is allowed.
- In the opinion of the investigator, should not be enrolled in this study
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Robert Feldmanlead
Study Sites (23)
University of California San Diego - Shiley Eye Institute
La Jolla, California, 92093, United States
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute - Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33418, United States
Northwestern University - Feinberg School of Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Stiles Eyecare Excellence and Glaucoma Institute
Overland Park, Kansas, 66213, United States
New England Eye Center - Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Glaucoma Consultants of St. Louis
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017, United States
Rutgers; New Jersey Medical School; IOVS
Newark, New Jersey, 07103, United States
Glaucoma Institute of Northern NJ, LLC
Rochelle Park, New Jersey, 07062, United States
New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10003, United States
Edward Harkness Eye Institute / Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
UNC Kittner Eye Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517, United States
Devers Eye Institute/Legacy Health
Portland, Oregon, 97210, United States
Wills Eye Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
UPMC Eye Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Vanderbilt Eye Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Robert Cizik Eye Clinic
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
Virginia Eye Institute
Richmond, Virginia, 23226, United States
University of Washington Medicine Eye Institute
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
WVU Eye Institute
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506, United States
Related Publications (17)
Arora KS, Robin AL, Corcoran KJ, Corcoran SL, Ramulu PY. Use of Various Glaucoma Surgeries and Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries from 1994 to 2012. Ophthalmology. 2015 Aug;122(8):1615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
PMID: 26092196BACKGROUNDGedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL; Tube versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):789-803.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.026. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
PMID: 22245458BACKGROUNDBudenz DL, Barton K, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Schiffman J, Costa VP, Godfrey DG, Buys YM; Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study Group. Five-year treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt comparison study. Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):308-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.043. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
PMID: 25439606BACKGROUNDAnand A, Tello C, Sidoti PA, Ritch R, Liebmann JM. Sequential glaucoma implants in refractory glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;149(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.07.019. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
PMID: 19837382BACKGROUNDBurgoyne JK, WuDunn D, Lakhani V, Cantor LB. Outcomes of sequential tube shunts in complicated glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000 Feb;107(2):309-14. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)00039-1.
PMID: 10690831BACKGROUNDNess PJ, Khaimi MA, Feldman RM, Tabet R, Sarkisian SR Jr, Skuta GL, Chuang AZ, Mankiewicz KA. Intermediate term safety and efficacy of transscleral cyclophotocoagulation after tube shunt failure. J Glaucoma. 2012 Feb;21(2):83-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820bd1ce.
PMID: 21336148BACKGROUNDJimenez-Roman J, Gil-Carrasco F, Costa VP, Schimiti RB, Lerner F, Santana PR, Vascocellos JP, Castillejos-Chevez A, Turati M, Fabre-Miranda K. Intraocular pressure control after the implantation of a second Ahmed glaucoma valve. Int Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun;36(3):347-53. doi: 10.1007/s10792-015-0125-z. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
PMID: 26334729BACKGROUNDSemchyshyn TM, Tsai JC, Joos KM. Supplemental transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation after aqueous shunt placement in refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2002 Jun;109(6):1078-84. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01019-9.
PMID: 12045047BACKGROUNDSmith M, Buys YM, Trope GE. Second Ahmed valve insertion in the same eye. J Glaucoma. 2009 Apr-May;18(4):336-40. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318182edfb.
PMID: 19365202BACKGROUNDGodfrey DG, Krishna R, Greenfield DS, Budenz DL, Gedde SJ, Scott IU. Implantation of second glaucoma drainage devices after failure of primary devices. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2002 Jan-Feb;33(1):37-43.
PMID: 11820661BACKGROUNDKo SJ, Hwang YH, Ahn SI, Kim HK. Surgical Outcomes of Additional Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016 Jun;25(6):e620-4. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000298.
PMID: 26091182BACKGROUNDFrancis BA, Kawji AS, Vo NT, Dustin L, Chopra V. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) in the management of uncontrolled glaucoma with prior aqueous tube shunt. J Glaucoma. 2011 Oct;20(8):523-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f46337.
PMID: 21048513BACKGROUNDSood S, Beck AD. Cyclophotocoagulation versus sequential tube shunt as a secondary intervention following primary tube shunt failure in pediatric glaucoma. J AAPOS. 2009 Aug;13(4):379-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.05.006.
PMID: 19683190BACKGROUNDSchaefer JL, Levine MA, Martorana G, Koenigsman H, Smith MF, Sherwood MB. Failed glaucoma drainage implant: long-term outcomes of a second glaucoma drainage device versus cyclophotocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;99(12):1718-24. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306725. Epub 2015 May 29.
PMID: 26024673BACKGROUNDGabelt BT, Kaufman PL. Changes in aqueous humor dynamics with age and glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005 Sep;24(5):612-37. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.10.003.
PMID: 15919228BACKGROUNDMa JX, Chuang AZ, Feldman RM, Mansberger SL, Tanna AP, Blieden LS, Shoham D, Bell NP, Gross RL, Pasquale LR, Greenfield DS, Liebmann JM, Weinreb RN; ASSISTS Study Group. Direct Costs of Second Aqueous Shunt Implant Versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation (The Assists Trial). J Glaucoma. 2023 Mar 1;32(3):145-150. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002143. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
PMID: 36848258DERIVEDFeldman RM, Chuang AZ, Mansberger SL, Tanna AP, Blieden LS, Bell NP, Gross RL, Pasquale LR, Greenfield DS, Liebmann JM, Weinreb RN; ASSISTS Group. Outcomes of the Second Aqueous Shunt Implant Versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation Treatment Study: A Randomized Comparative Trial. J Glaucoma. 2022 Sep 1;31(9):701-709. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002079. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
PMID: 35901309DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robert M. Feldman, MD
- Organization
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Robert Feldman, MD
Robert Cizik Eye Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2016
First Posted
February 25, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 30, 2020
Study Completion
September 30, 2020
Last Updated
November 2, 2021
Results First Posted
October 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
To the American Glaucoma Society members after completion of the study, with an institutional review board (IRB) approved protocol.