Fast-track Surgery After Gynecological Oncology Surgery
Fast-track Surgery After Gynaecological Oncological Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
107
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Fast-track surgery (FTS) pathway, also known as enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), FTS is a multidisciplinary approach aiming to accelerate recovery, reduce complications, minimize hospital stay without an increased readmission rate and reduce healthcare costs, all without compromising patient safety. It has been used successfully in non-malignant gynecological surgery, but it has been proven to be especially effective in elective colorectal surgery. However, no consensus guideline has been developed for gynecological oncology surgery although surgeons have attempted to introduce slightly modified FTS programmes for patients undergoing such surgery. NO randomised controlled trials for now. The advantages of fast-track most likely extend to gynecology, although so far have scarcely been reported. There is a existing research showed FTS in gynecological oncology provide early hospital discharge after gynaecological surgery meanwhile with high levels of patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to identify patients following a FTS program who have been discharged earlier than anticipated after major gynaecological/gynaecological oncologic surgery and analyze the complication after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 2, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 21, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 26, 2019
CompletedSeptember 26, 2019
August 1, 2019
10 months
February 2, 2016
April 23, 2018
August 25, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Length of Hospitalization Post-operation
days from operation date to discharge date
up to 12 months
The Total Cost (RMB)
The total cost from hospitalization
12 month
Secondary Outcomes (9)
CRP
up to 12 months
Number of Participants With Complications
up to 12 months
Number of Participants With Infection,
up to 12 months
Number of Participants With Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
up to 12 months
Number of Participants With Ileus
up to 12 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fast-track Surgery
EXPERIMENTALPre-operative: Assessment, counseling and education; preoperative nutritional drink up to 4 h prior to surgery, bowel preparation, only oral intestinal cleaner,antimicrobial prophylaxis and skin preparation; preoperative treatment with carbohydrates (patients without diabetes). Intraoperative : fast solid food before 6 h and liquid food Intake of clear fluids 2 h before anaesthesia; avoiding hypothermia keeping temperature at 36 ±0.5℃, antiemetics at end of anaesthesia. Post-operative : Postoperative glycaemic control; postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) control; early postoperative diet(3-6 h after surgery).
Traditional surgery
OTHERpre-operative assessment:pre-operative fasting at least 8h, bowel preparation for traditional surgery, Antimicrobial prophylaxis and skin preparation or mechanical bowl until liquid stool Intraoperative: keeping the intra-operative lowtemperature at 34.7±0.6 degree centigrade. Post-operative: 6 h after surgery, patients resumed a liquid diet, patients began to take solid diet after anal exhaust
Interventions
pre-operative assessment, counseling and FT management education
Preoperative nutritional drink up to 4 h prior to surgery mechanical bowl preparation should not be used
patients are not received mechanical bowel preparation, only oral intestinal cleaner 12 h pre-operation can be accepted, but no need of liquid stool
preoperative treatment with carbohydrates (patients without diabetes).
fast solid food before 6 h and liquid food Intake of clear fluids 2 h before anaesthesia;
avoiding hypothermia, keeping the intra-operative lowtemperature at 36 ±0.5 degree centigrade; antiemetics at end of anaesthesia.
early postoperative diet(3-6 h after surgery, patients resumed a liquid diet, 12 h after surgery patients began to take solid diet).
Oral bowel preparations or mechanical bowl until liquid stool
6 h after surgery, patients resumed a liquid diet, patients began to take solid diet after anal exhaust
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for gynecological oncology surgery(including radical hysterectomy add lymphadenectomy, hysterectomy add lymphadenectomy and cytoreductive)
- Aged 18 years or older
- Signed informed consent provided
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a documented infection at the time of operation
- Aged 71 years or older
- Patients with ileus at the time of operation
- Patients with hypocoagulability
- Patients with psychosis, Alcohol dependence or drug abuse history
- Patients with primary nephrotic or hepatic disease
- Patients with severe hypertension systolic pressure≥160mmHg, diastolic pressure\>90mmHg
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ling Cuilead
Study Sites (1)
LinShuangfeng
Leshan, Sichuan, 610000, China
Related Publications (24)
Kehlet H. Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet. 2008 Mar 8;371(9615):791-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60357-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 18328911BACKGROUNDKehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002 Jun;183(6):630-41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00866-8.
PMID: 12095591BACKGROUNDPolle SW, Wind J, Fuhring JW, Hofland J, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA. Implementation of a fast-track perioperative care program: what are the difficulties? Dig Surg. 2007;24(6):441-9. doi: 10.1159/000108327. Epub 2007 Sep 13.
PMID: 17851238BACKGROUNDAcheson N, Crawford R. The impact of mode of anaesthesia on postoperative recovery from fast-track abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG. 2011 Feb;118(3):271-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02811.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 21226823RESULTBardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. 1995 Mar 25;345(8952):763-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90643-6.
PMID: 7891489RESULTCarter J, Szabo R, Sim WW, Pather S, Philp S, Nattress K, Cotterell S, Patel P, Dalrymple C. Fast track surgery: a clinical audit. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Apr;50(2):159-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01134.x.
PMID: 20522073RESULTBona S, Molteni M, Rosati R, Elmore U, Bagnoli P, Monzani R, Caravaca M, Montorsi M. Introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery: a single center experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 14;20(46):17578-87. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17578.
PMID: 25516673RESULTCarter J. Fast-track surgery in gynaecology and gynaecologic oncology: a review of a rolling clinical audit. ISRN Surg. 2012;2012:368014. doi: 10.5402/2012/368014. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
PMID: 23320193RESULTFearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, Nygren J, Hausel J, Soop M, Andersen J, Kehlet H. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005 Jun;24(3):466-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002. Epub 2005 Apr 21.
PMID: 15896435RESULTKehlet H. Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Aug;15(4):355-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832fbbe7.
PMID: 19617822RESULTKehlet H. Fast-track surgery-an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Jun;396(5):585-90. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0790-y. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
PMID: 21468643RESULTKehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):189-98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a.
PMID: 18650627RESULTKranke P, Redel A, Schuster F, Muellenbach R, Eberhart LH. Pharmacological interventions and concepts of fast-track perioperative medical care for enhanced recovery programs. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Jun;9(9):1541-64. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.9.1541.
PMID: 18518784RESULTLin YS. Preliminary results of laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 Feb;10(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60239-3.
PMID: 12554999RESULTLu D, Wang X, Shi G. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 19;2015(3):CD008239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub4.
PMID: 25789452RESULTLv D, Wang X, Shi G. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD008239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub2.
PMID: 20556792RESULTMarx C, Rasmussen T, Jakobsen DH, Ottosen C, Lundvall L, Ottesen B, Callesen T, Kehlet H. The effect of accelerated rehabilitation on recovery after surgery for ovarian malignancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(4):488-92. doi: 10.1080/00016340500408325.
PMID: 16612713RESULTMoher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG; CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):657-62. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00011.
PMID: 11304106RESULTMortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schafer M, Mariette C, Braga M, Carli F, Demartines N, Griffin SM, Lassen K; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Group. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Br J Surg. 2014 Sep;101(10):1209-29. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9582. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
PMID: 25047143RESULTPhilp S, Carter J, Pather S, Barnett C, D'Abrew N, White K. Patients' satisfaction with fast-track surgery in gynaecological oncology. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 Jul;24(4):567-73. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12254. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
PMID: 25335828RESULTPruthi RS, Nielsen M, Smith A, Nix J, Schultz H, Wallen EM. Fast track program in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: results in 362 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jan;210(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.026. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
PMID: 20123338RESULTSjetne IS, Krogstad U, Odegard S, Engh ME. Improving quality by introducing enhanced recovery after surgery in a gynaecological department: consequences for ward nursing practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Jun;18(3):236-40. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023382.
PMID: 19468009RESULTChau JPC, Liu X, Lo SHS, Chien WT, Hui SK, Choi KC, Zhao J. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 15;3(3):CD008239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub5.
PMID: 35289396DERIVEDCui L, Shi Y, Zhang GN. Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Dec 15;17(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1688-3.
PMID: 27978842DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Cui Ling
- Organization
- SichuanCHRI
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ling Cui, MD
Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yu Shi
Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hong Liu
Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dengfeng Wang
Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Patients were randomly divided into two groups( FTS group/traditional group), after that doctors and patients were aware of the grouping situation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2016
First Posted
February 22, 2016
Study Start
November 21, 2016
Primary Completion
September 2, 2017
Study Completion
March 21, 2018
Last Updated
September 26, 2019
Results First Posted
September 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share