Study Stopped
Due to problems regarding methodology.
Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring (esCCO™) in Critically Ill Patients Within ICU
Cardiac Output Monitoring System (esCCO™) in Comparison to Transcardiopulmonal Thermodilution Technique (PiCCO®) in Critically Ill Patients Within Interdisciplinary Surgical Intensive Care Units
1 other identifier
observational
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Evaluation of a non-invasive technique to measure cardiac output (esCCO™) with the "clinical goldstandard" of the transcardiopulmonal thermodilution technique (PiCCO®). Effect of different potential interference factors to the accuracy of measurement (changing concentration of norepinephrine, generally severity of the basic disease - APACHE II score).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Aug 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedJune 13, 2019
June 1, 2019
4 months
January 12, 2016
June 11, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison between esCCOTM and the transcardiopulmonal thermodilution technique (PiCCO®)
Comparison of cardiac output, utilizing cardiac index (CI), between (esCCO™) and the "clinical goldstandard" of the transcardiopulmonal thermodilution technique (PiCCO®)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Effect of different potential interference factors to the accuracy of measurement (changing concentration of norepinephrine, generally severity of the basic disease)
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (1)
requirement of norepinephrine
requirement of norepinephrine \<0,1 µg/kgKG/min versus ≥0,1 µg/kgKG/min
Eligibility Criteria
The aim of this study is the estimation of the agreement between esCCO™ and the transcardiopulmonal thermodilution technique (PiCCO®) using Bland-Altman-treatment. The 95%-confidence interval of the limits of agreement was selected for the design of the number of cases. At a number of cases by 100 you will get the width of 0,68 s (s: standard deviation of the differences of the measurement techniques). This is reasonable for the question (Bland and Altman 1986, you have to compare the recommendation of Bland: https://www.users.york.ac.uk/\~mb55/meas/sizemeth.htm).
You may qualify if:
- The extended haemodynamic monitoring procedure PiCCO® has already been established due to the clinical decision making of the medical practitioner team
You may not qualify if:
- atrial fibrillation
- cardiac arrhythmias
- cardiac pacemaker
- intraaortic counterpulsation
- pericardial tamponade
- age \< 18 years
- missing or incorrect patient consent form
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
GERMANY - Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24109, Germany
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jochen Renner, PD Dr. med
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PD Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2016
First Posted
February 15, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 13, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share