NCT02681328

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of Afirma GSC and ThyroSeq v.3 in indeterminate thyroid nodules to determine which test can allow more patients to avoid unnecessary surgery and preserve quality of life. In the initial phase of this study, the performance of Afirma GEC and ThyroSeq v.2 were compared.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
328

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
19mo left

Started May 2016

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress86%
May 2016Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 10, 2016

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 12, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2016

Completed
10.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

December 22, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

10.6 years

First QC Date

February 10, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Afirma GEC vs. ThyroSeq v.2 in indeterminate thyroid nodules post best practices surgery

    compare the performance of Afirma GEC and ThyroSeq v.2 in indeterminate thyroid nodules to determine which test can allow more patients to avoid unnecessary surgery and preserve quality of life. (5) Patients who undergo surgery will have histopathologic evaluation of the thyroid, which will determine whether the index thyroid nodule was benign or malignant.

    12 months. [This phase of the study is now completed]

  • 2. Afirma GSC vs. ThyroSeq v.3 in indeterminate thyroid nodules post best practices surgery

    compare the performance of Afirma GSC and ThyroSeq v.3 in indeterminate thyroid nodules to determine which test can allow more patients to avoid unnecessary surgery and preserve quality of life. (5) Patients who undergo surgery will have histopathologic evaluation of the thyroid, which will determine whether the index thyroid nodule was benign or malignant.

    12 months.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Avoidance of unnecessary surgeries

    12 months

Study Arms (4)

Afirma GEC

single molecular test GEC of collected tissue

Other: Afirma GEC

ThyroSeq v.2

single molecular test ThyroSeq v.2 of collected tissue

Other: ThyroSeq v.2

Afirma GSC

single molecular test GSC of collected tissue

Other: Afirma GSC

ThyroSeq v.3

single molecular test ThyroSeq v.3 of collected tissue

Other: ThyroSeq v.3

Interventions

Afirma GEC molecular test on collected thyroid tissue

Afirma GEC

ThyroSeq v.2 molecular test on collected thyroid tissue

ThyroSeq v.2

Afirma GSC molecular test on collected thyroid tissue

Afirma GSC

ThyroSeq v.3 molecular test on collected thyroid tissue

ThyroSeq v.3

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients undergoing thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) within the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Health System

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with a thyroid nodule who have a thyroid biopsy performed at UCLA health will be eligible for the study and consented if they agree to participate.
  • Patients who have an indeterminate FNA biopsy result (Bethesda category 3 or 4) will be enrolled in the study if they agree to participate.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who do not have an indeterminate biopsy result (either patients who have a benign, insufficient, or malignant result).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA

Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Cibas ES, Ali SZ; NCI Thyroid FNA State of the Science Conference. The Bethesda System For Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Nov;132(5):658-65. doi: 10.1309/AJCPPHLWMI3JV4LA.

    PMID: 19846805BACKGROUND
  • Lee L, How J, Tabah RJ, Mitmaker EJ. Cost-effectiveness of molecular testing for thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance cytology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Aug;99(8):2674-82. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1219. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

    PMID: 24684467BACKGROUND
  • Alexander EK, Kennedy GC, Baloch ZW, Cibas ES, Chudova D, Diggans J, Friedman L, Kloos RT, LiVolsi VA, Mandel SJ, Raab SS, Rosai J, Steward DL, Walsh PS, Wilde JI, Zeiger MA, Lanman RB, Haugen BR. Preoperative diagnosis of benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 23;367(8):705-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203208. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

    PMID: 22731672BACKGROUND
  • Nikiforov YE, Carty SE, Chiosea SI, Coyne C, Duvvuri U, Ferris RL, Gooding WE, LeBeau SO, Ohori NP, Seethala RR, Tublin ME, Yip L, Nikiforova MN. Impact of the Multi-Gene ThyroSeq Next-Generation Sequencing Assay on Cancer Diagnosis in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Cytology. Thyroid. 2015 Nov;25(11):1217-23. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0305. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

    PMID: 26356635BACKGROUND
  • Wu JX, Lam R, Levin M, Rao J, Sullivan PS, Yeh MW. Effect of malignancy rates on cost-effectiveness of routine gene expression classifier testing for indeterminate thyroid nodules. Surgery. 2016 Jan;159(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.035. Epub 2015 Oct 2.

    PMID: 26435428BACKGROUND
  • Wu JX, Young S, Hung ML, Li N, Yang SE, Cheung DS, Yeh MW, Livhits MJ. Clinical Factors Influencing the Performance of Gene Expression Classifier Testing in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules. Thyroid. 2016 Jul;26(7):916-22. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0505. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

    PMID: 27161519BACKGROUND
  • Hu TX, Nguyen DT, Patel M, Beckett K, Douek M, Masamed R, Rhyu J, Kim J, Tseng CH, Yeh MW, Livhits MJ. The Effect Modification of Ultrasound Risk Classification on Molecular Testing in Predicting the Risk of Malignancy in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules. Thyroid. 2022 Aug;32(8):905-916. doi: 10.1089/thy.2021.0659. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

  • Zhu CY, Donangelo I, Gupta D, Nguyen DT, Ochoa JE, Yeh MW, Livhits MJ. Outcomes of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules Managed Nonoperatively after Molecular Testing. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Mar 8;106(3):e1240-e1247. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa887.

  • Livhits MJ, Zhu CY, Kuo EJ, Nguyen DT, Kim J, Tseng CH, Leung AM, Rao J, Levin M, Douek ML, Beckett KR, Cheung DS, Gofnung YA, Smooke-Praw S, Yeh MW. Effectiveness of Molecular Testing Techniques for Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;7(1):70-77. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5935.

  • Livhits MJ, Kuo EJ, Leung AM, Rao J, Levin M, Douek ML, Beckett KR, Zanocco KA, Cheung DS, Gofnung YA, Smooke-Praw S, Yeh MW. Gene Expression Classifier vs Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in the Management of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jun 1;103(6):2261-2268. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02754.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Thyroid Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Masha Livhits, MC

    Visiting Assistant Professor

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2016

First Posted

February 12, 2016

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

December 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations