NCT02678403

Brief Summary

Purpose: The investigators team recently carried out a proof of concept study testing the efficacy of one single 45-minute session of 10 Hz TENS prior to walking, versus placebo. In this randomized study, the investigators found that TENS significantly delayed pain onset and increased the pain-free walking distance in patients with class II PAD. From these encouraging results, the investigators now seek to assess the efficacy of an intervention that includes the daily use of TENS for 3 weeks (5 days a week) on walking distance in PAD (Leriche-Fontaine stage II). Methods/Design: prospective multicentre study / randomized controlled trial / double blinding.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 8, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2016

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 16, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 16, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 16, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 4, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

January 8, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 20, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

peripheral artery diseasetranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulationwalking abilityendothelial function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • walking distance without pain (in meters)

    the evolution of the claudication distance between the start and the end of the study (1 session of TENS each day , 15 days in total) in the two intervention group (TENS vs SHAM). Measure of change between inclusion and end of study.

    Change between J0 and J25 (15 days)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • maximal oxygen consumption (VO2peak in ml.min)

    Change between J0 and J25 (15 days)

Study Arms (2)

1 - TENS group

EXPERIMENTAL

The treatment will consist of Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): stimulation of the leg (frequency of 10 Hz, Biphasic, with a pulse width of 200 µs, maximal intensity below motor threshold), 45 minutes per day, in the morning before the exercise rehabilitation programme, for 3 weeks, 5 days per week.

Device: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

2 - SHAM group

SHAM COMPARATOR

SHAM Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) : the stimulation placebo will be delivered according to the same modalities as for the TENS group but with a voltage level that vanishes automatically after 10 seconds of stimulation.

Device: SHAM Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

Interventions

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is the use of electric current produced by a device to stimulate the nerves that only induces sensory stimulation (without muscle contraction) and is classically used in the treatment of pain.

1 - TENS group

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is the use of electric current produced by a device to stimulate the nerves that only induces sensory stimulation (without muscle contraction) and is classically used in the treatment of pain.

2 - SHAM group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Unilateral Leriche stage II PAD, admitted to cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit
  • Men or women
  • Able to take part in an out-patient rehabilitation programme
  • Clinically stable
  • Sedentary
  • Provided informed consent to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Ward of court
  • Walking disorders related to orthopaedic or neuromuscular disease
  • Participation in a structured physical reconditioning programme in the month before the study
  • Renal insufficiency requiring dialysis
  • Known and documented myopathy
  • Progressive cancer
  • Associated progressive disease causing a deterioration in general health
  • Participation in another research protocol
  • Skin disorder making it impossible to use TENS
  • Absolute contra-indication to physical activity
  • Presence of pacemaker / defibrillator
  • Pregnant women in the 1st trimester / 12 weeks

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

University Hospital of Dijon

Dijon, 21079, France

Location

University Hospital of Nîmes

Nîmes, France

Location

Clinique de Saint-Orens

Saint-Orens-de-Gameville, 31650, France

Location

Toulouse University Hospital (CHU de Toulouse)

Toulouse, 31059, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Besnier F, Senard JM, Gremeaux V, Riedel M, Garrigues D, Guiraud T, Labrunee M. The efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the improvement of walking distance in patients with peripheral arterial disease with intermittent claudication: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial: the TENS-PAD study. Trials. 2017 Aug 10;18(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1997-1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Interventions

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AtherosclerosisArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPeripheral Vascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitationAnalgesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • Marc LABRUNEE, MD

    University Hospital, Toulouse

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2016

First Posted

February 9, 2016

Study Start

August 16, 2018

Primary Completion

September 16, 2019

Study Completion

September 16, 2019

Last Updated

February 4, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations