Evaluating the Efficacy of a Group Social Skills Intervention
A Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Group Social Skills Intervention for Childhood Survivors of Brain Tumours
1 other identifier
interventional
95
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Tumours affecting the brain are a very heterogeneous group of diseases. Accordingly, treatment strategies vary widely depending on child's age, tumour location, its resectability and histology. As a group, however, the survival rate of childhood brain tumors has improved in recent years, resulting in an increased number of survivors returning to school and reintegrating into their communities. Survival for many of them, however, has also come with severe costs such as neurocognitive and academic difficulties. Cognitive rehabilitation strategies to address these deficits have been a major focus of recent research. Evidence is now also mounting for social competence deficits among this population which may persist into late adolescence and adulthood, thereby negatively affecting long-term survivorship. Thus, there is an urgency to identify psychosocial interventions, such as social skills programs, that can reduce the social competence deficits in childhood brain tumor survivors and, therefore, modify the course of these outcomes to ensure that survivors thrive and become productive members of society. To date, no rigorous social skills intervention trials have been undertaken to address the social difficulties of these survivors. The current proposal is the first study that aims to address this gap by evaluating the efficacy of an innovative, manualized, social skills intervention program developed for this population using a multi-centre Randomized Control Trial (RCT).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2016
CompletedMay 9, 2016
May 1, 2016
3.7 years
December 14, 2015
May 6, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Parent-rated social skills - assessment of change across three time points
Measured by Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)\[37\]. The SSRS is a standardized instrument that has parent, teacher and child versions.
day 1, 8 weeks later, and 6 months after day 1
Child-rated social skills -- assessment of change across three time points
Measured by Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)\[37\]. The SSRS is a standardized instrument that has parent, teacher and child versions.
day 1, 8 weeks later, and 6 months after day 1
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Quality of life ratings - general, parental assessment of change across three time points
day 1, 8 weeks later, and 6 months after day 1
Quality of life ratings - general, child assessment of change across three time points
day 1, 8 weeks later, and 6 months after day 1
Quality of life ratings - brain tumour module, parent assessment of change across three time points
day 1, 8 weeks later, and 6 months after day 1
Quality of life ratings - brain tumour module, child assessment of change across three time points
day 1, 8 weeks later, and 6 months after day 1
Child's social functioning - assessment of change across three time points
day 1, 8 weeks later, and 6 months after day 1
Study Arms (2)
Attention Control Group (CG)
ACTIVE COMPARATORBehavioural: CG: Social Skills Activities: Participants in this arm will experience an 8-week manualized intervention program with activities and games. Sessions will NOT be designed around a specific social skill and activities and games will NOT have a specific focus. Sessions will be conducted by facilitators who will receive the standard training for volunteers and will work under the supervision of one of the investigators at each site.
Experimental Group (EG)
EXPERIMENTALBehavioral: Structured social skills training program, SSIP. Participants in this arm will experience an 8-week manualized intervention program that addresses six major social skills, one per session, starting with easier skills (Social Initiation and Friendship Making, Cooperation) and moving towards more complex skills (Managing Teasing and Bullying, Conflict Resolution, Empathy, and Assertion). Sessions will be conducted by facilitators who will receive the standard training for volunteers and will work under the supervision of one of the investigators at each site.
Interventions
Detailed, session by session, in the manual written for this purpose. It addresses six major social skills, one per session, starting with easier skills (Social Initiation and Friendship Making, Cooperation) and moving towards more complex skills (Managing Teasing and Bullying, Conflict Resolution, Empathy, and Assertion).
Sessions will not be designed around a specific social skill and activities and games will not have a specific focus. CG sessions will be conducted by facilitators who will receive the standard training for volunteers and will work under the supervision of one of the investigators at each site.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with a brain/spinal tumour
- off treatment for at least 3 months or on maintenance chemotherapy but medically stable, e.g., low grade gliomas
- between 8 and 16 years of age at the time of enrollment
- have sufficient fluency in English for active group participation
- attending school regularly and in a regular classroom for at least 50% of a school day
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cognitive deficits, as defined by enrollment in full-time special classroom, which will prevent them from participating fully
- a diagnosis of conduct disorder or any other condition that may interfere with group activities. Survivors and parents who have some difficulties reading (i.e., English is their second language) will be assisted by a research assistant (RA) in completing the questionnaires.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Alberta Childrens Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
BC Women and Children's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, M5V1X8, Canada
Related Publications (9)
Butler RW, Mulhern RK. Neurocognitive interventions for children and adolescents surviving cancer. J Pediatr Psychol. 2005 Jan-Feb;30(1):65-78. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsi017.
PMID: 15610986BACKGROUNDReddick WE, White HA, Glass JO, Wheeler GC, Thompson SJ, Gajjar A, Leigh L, Mulhern RK. Developmental model relating white matter volume to neurocognitive deficits in pediatric brain tumor survivors. Cancer. 2003 May 15;97(10):2512-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11355.
PMID: 12733151BACKGROUNDCopeland DR, deMoor C, Moore BD 3rd, Ater JL. Neurocognitive development of children after a cerebellar tumor in infancy: A longitudinal study. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Nov;17(11):3476-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3476.
PMID: 10550145BACKGROUNDButler RW, Copeland DR. Attentional processes and their remediation in children treated for cancer: a literature review and the development of a therapeutic approach. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002 Jan;8(1):115-24.
PMID: 11843068BACKGROUNDRadcliffe J, Bennett D, Kazak AE, Foley B, Phillips PC. Adjustment in childhood brain tumor survival: child, mother, and teacher report. J Pediatr Psychol. 1996 Aug;21(4):529-39. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/21.4.529.
PMID: 8863462BACKGROUNDVannatta K, Gartstein MA, Short A, Noll RB. A controlled study of peer relationships of children surviving brain tumors: teacher, peer, and self ratings. J Pediatr Psychol. 1998 Oct;23(5):279-87. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/23.5.279.
PMID: 9782676BACKGROUNDSchulte F, Barrera M. Social competence in childhood brain tumor survivors: a comprehensive review. Support Care Cancer. 2010 Dec;18(12):1499-513. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0963-1. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
PMID: 20680353BACKGROUNDBarrera M, Shaw AK, Speechley KN, Maunsell E, Pogany L. Educational and social late effects of childhood cancer and related clinical, personal, and familial characteristics. Cancer. 2005 Oct 15;104(8):1751-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21390.
PMID: 16130127BACKGROUNDZebrack BJ, Gurney JG, Oeffinger K, Whitton J, Packer RJ, Mertens A, Turk N, Castleberry R, Dreyer Z, Robison LL, Zeltzer LK. Psychological outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood brain cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;22(6):999-1006. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.148.
PMID: 15020603BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maru Barrera, MD
The Hospital for Sick Children
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Psychologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2015
First Posted
February 9, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05