Consolidating Tools for Outcomes in Resuscitation
CONTOUR
1 other identifier
interventional
456
1 country
2
Brief Summary
In-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest is an important public health problem affecting almost 6000 children a year in the United States. As many as 3% of patients admitted to a children's hospital require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Only a minority of children survive, of which around 35% go on to have a poor neurological outcome. International consensus guidelines on science and treatment recommendations for the management of pediatric resuscitation have existed for decades and are revised periodically by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) based on available evidence. This consensus is then used by national councils such as the American Heart Association (AHA) and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC) to make guidelines for care. These guidelines focus on a structured approach to resuscitation, which emphasizes the rapid implementation of key interventions such as starting chest compressions, administering epinephrine and defibrillation. The goal of this study is to improve outcomes after cardiac arrest in children by improving adherence to consensus guidelines. The investigators aim to achieve this by conducting a multi-center, prospective, factorial randomized study with participating sites from the International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research and Education (INSPIRE). The specific aims of this study are to:
- 1.To evaluate the effectiveness of knowledge-based cognitive aids, namely the Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) algorithm cards, in healthcare teams.
- 2.To evaluate the effectiveness of teamwork-based cognitive aids, namely the Cognitive Aids with Roles Defined (CARD) system, in healthcare teams.
- 3.To determine if there is a synergistic effect when adding the CARD system to the use of knowledge-based cognitive aids or indeed whether using both these tools together has unintended consequences and reduces the added value of each technique.
- 4.To identify whether additional simulation-based team training in the use of cognitive aids results in a significant improvement in performance over an e-learning module.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 5, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedAugust 14, 2017
August 1, 2017
2 years
December 8, 2015
August 10, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Adherence to PALS guidelines as measured by the clinical performance tool (CPT)
Simulated scenarios will be videotaped. These will be scored according to the CPT which is a task-specific checklist that is reliable and validated in assessing performance in a multi-professional team
At baseline (pre-test)
Adherence to PALS guidelines as measured by the clinical performance tool (CPT)
Simulated scenarios will be videotaped. These will be scored according to the CPT which is a task-specific checklist that is reliable and validated in assessing performance in a multi-professional team
At post-test 1 (same day as pre-test)
Adherence to PALS guidelines as measured by the clinical performance tool (CPT)
Simulated scenarios will be videotaped. These will be scored according to the CPT which is a task-specific checklist that is reliable and validated in assessing performance in a multi-professional team
At post-test 2 (same day as pre-test)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Time to initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation
This outcome measure will be assessed during the pre-test, post-test 1 and post-test 2. All the scenarios take place on the same day.
Time to administration of epinephrine
This outcome measure will be assessed during the pre-test, post-test 1 and post-test 2. All the scenarios take place on the same day.
Time to defibrillation after the start of phase 2 of the scenario (VF)
This outcome measure will be assessed during the pre-test, post-test 1 and post-test 2. All the scenarios take place on the same day.
Percentage of "no-flow" time without chest compressions
This outcome measure will be assessed during the pre-test, post-test 1 and post-test 2. All the scenarios take place on the same day.
Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) scale
This outcome measure will be assessed during the pre-test, post-test 1 and post-test 2. All the scenarios take place on the same day.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONResuscitation teams will participate in a simulated pediatric cardiac arrest scenario, and provide standard CPR without being provided cognitive aids. Participants in this group will be allowed to use any cognitive aid that they happen to keep with them and would normally use in their practice, for example, flash cards or smart phone apps.
Knowledge-based cognitive aid
EXPERIMENTALResuscitation teams participate in a simulated pediatric cardiac arrest scenario, and provide standard CPR. However, they will be trained in using a knowledge-based cognitive aid, which will be used by a dedicated team member (the cognitive aid "reader").
Cognitive aids with roles defined (CARD)
EXPERIMENTALResuscitation teams participate in a simulated pediatric cardiac arrest scenario, and provide standard CPR. Participants will be trained to use the cognitive aids with roles defined (CARD) system. However, they will not be given knowledge-based cognitive aids and there will be no dedicated cognitive aid reader in the team.
Integrated cognitive aids
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be trained to use the cognitive aids with roles defined (CARD) system and also in the use of a protocol-based cognitive aid, which will be used by a dedicated cognitive aid reader.
Interventions
Trained on the use of a knowledge-based cognitive aid for pediatric cardiac arrests. Will be used by a dedicated team member (cognitive aid "reader").
Trained on the use of the cognitive aids with roles defined (CARD) system for pediatric cardiac arrests. Participants are given large identification cards to be worn, which enable the code leader to quickly recognize the individuals' purpose at the code. The card identifies specific tasks associated with the role, ensuring that the participant knows exactly what their task is. Will not have a dedicated team member during the scenario (cognitive aid "reader").
Trained on the use of the cognitive aids with roles defined (CARD) system and also in the use of a protocol-based cognitive aid for pediatric cardiac arrests which will be used by a dedicated cognitive aid "reader".
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Team Leader: Resident in Pediatrics, Anesthesia, or Emergency Medicine training programs and College of Family Physicians of Canada resident. Fellows in Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Pediatric Critical Care or Pediatric Anesthesia sub-specialty training programs. Staff general Pediatricians.
- Team members: Registered Nurses, Respiratory Therapists, Pediatric Residents.
You may not qualify if:
- Decline to consent to participation. Those that would not attend a code outside of the operating room.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institutelead
- The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundationcollaborator
- University of Ottawacollaborator
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontariocollaborator
- The Hospital for Sick Childrencollaborator
- Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHCcollaborator
- Alberta Children's Hospitalcollaborator
- Stollery Children's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2015
First Posted
February 5, 2016
Study Start
July 5, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
August 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08